715
247

Family died in Rockies after trying to live ‘off the grid,’ official says

2y 10mon ago by lemmy.world/u/TheTango in news from www.boston.com

Two sisters and a teenage son moved to a Colorado campsite last July, living off canned food. They had wanted to take a break from a world that distressed them, a local coroner said.

This is very sad, and preventable.

Reading the article it sounds like this woman unfortunately just spent too much time on social media reading all the doom and gloom of the media and people amplifying it in places like reddit, Twitter and Facebook.

wanted to live in a land disconnected from the world, which she viewed as chaotic and dangerous

she and her teenage son could be happy and safe away from the news, the viruses, the politics of modern-day America

had been “discouraged with the state of the world”

Rebecca Vance’s fears intensified during the pandemic

Consuming too much of this crap has really affected peoples mental health, from Trump, to BLM riots, racism, covid, it’s broken some people who spend too much time on social media.

So much so that they think the only way out is to hide away from society.

Reminder, friends, to take frequent and extensive breaks from social media for your own mental health.

The teenager — whom Jara described as a smart and caring son who had been a “mama’s boy” and had been home-schooled

The only food found at their shelter was a single package of ramen

Please, I knew people who were exactly the same back in the 90s, there are always people who go down the paranoia rabbit hole and don't come back out.

Lot of them were praying for the collapse because that's when God would raise them above the wicked heathens and sodomites because they're secretly special but everyone else is too evil to admit it.

The article said the poor kid was homeschooled, which is often a hallmark of religious fundamentalism. Not trusting the world and thinking it's out to get you is also a hallmark of fundamentalism - but also of mental illness.

She's from Colorado Springs (massive conservative area) and she became concerned about the world and wanted to live off the grid in 2022 (when Trump lost). The writer of this article sure does beat around the bush and struggles not to say whether she was a right wing nut.

The BLM "riots" were 99% protests where the only violence was on the part of the cops harassing protesters.

100%. Some people exploited the riots to break into stores but they were the significant minority, and additionally some were outed as bad actors who actually didn't support the movement.

You can't lump in blm riots in there, those were protests stoked to violence by police officers, so what you should be saying it's, corrupt police forces resulting in blm protests

Maybe I'm being too generous, but I was reading it as this person consumed too much media, including lies and exaggerations, and it warped their world view. I guess I read it as a topic like and not calling them riots themselves. Kinda like the "race riot" in Tusla, but idk.

Man gotta love when those protesters storm the local grocery store to fight social injustice. BLM!

You can't deny that there is something fascinating about this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUO8secmc0g

Not reading Twitter has a tangible impact on my anxiety. You can feel it rise when I used it, fell away when I stopped.

I haven't used Facebook in almost 2 years now and it's so nice

And remember that despite some unique large scale issues we have today, there were much, MUCH worse times to be alive. “Majority of Americans live a peaceful life and die at 70-80” is not reportable news but still largely true.

Things are far from perfect, there are major issues, but I’d choose to live today than almost the entirety of human existence previously.

There were definitely way more violent times in the US: there were pandemics, there were revolts, there were wars. We live in an amazing time but it takes a bit of grand perspective to realize that all the bad news is easy to see in a matter of minutes. You can have death and destruction delivered right into your home in a matter of milliseconds. It’s much much harder to see all the wonderful things happening in the world

she and her teenage son could be happy and safe away from the news, the viruses, the politics of modern-day America

Just close the apps. That's literally all it takes to avoid like 90% of the crap that she's talking about. But the viruses.... did she think those don't make it to the forest or something?

I hate how people talk about off grid living as something you can pull off alone, that's difficult even if you allow for buying food and installing all kinds of fancy infrastructure in your home.

The truth is that properly sustainable and reliable off-grid living requires a small community, because you need a lot of labour.

Right? Living off grid used to be called being banished by your tribe and it was basically a death sentence.

Other people are annoying as fuck, but I recognize I need them to live.

Casuals ruin everything

You nailed it. And these folks were simply living off canned food and ramen... For how long?

Communal living is great if you get the right mix of people with a shared vision... In the right location... With the right resources... To be successful it seems you need to have a pretty organic evolution of the process and attract people with shared vision. The dark side of this devolves into cultism; the brighter side is a sustainable living and sense of belonging.

Now there are people who live off the grid in places like Alaska (just watch Life Below Zero) and do it successfully... But these people grew up doing that or studied and prepared A LOT. And man, doing that solo is not easy. None of them seemed to be super healthy or cheerful.

In the past it took entire villages who still engaged in trade. Even back then you were on the grid even if it was a stone age one.

Kazinsky didn't live off the grid. He worked as a teacher from time to time, and received financial support from his father.

I don't know this guy, but even Superman needs a backup plan in case he gets sick, and infected wound or ruins his ankle by tripping over something. Living off grid alone is just one misstep away from catastrophe.

Somebody read Little House on the Prairie once and said, "I can do that!" I'm joking, but only slightly.

I read a book a while back about the real life of the author of little house on the prairie (it's called "prairie fires") - her books really sugarcoat how hard life was - even people who knew how to live off the land had a really hard time

Now there are people who live off the grid in places like Alaska (just watch Life Below Zero) and do it successfully… But these people grew up doing that or studied and prepared A LOT. And man, doing that solo is not easy. None of them seemed to be super healthy or cheerful.

But even in the story they went into town for food and blankets, and they didn't try to winter in a tent.

You quoted a post other than the one to which you replied

And everyone that wanted to live off the grid wanted to get away from people.

I am reminded of that guy who did that in Alaska solo, for like 30 years Dick Perniky or some such I believe his name was. He took video of wildlife and got it edited. I think he was 50 or there abouts when he left the lower 48.

I wish people would realize that humans only got to where we are because we are a COMMUNAL species. We developed complex language and tool usage BECAUSE we work together. Being "off the grid" is usually isolationist and therefore extremely dangerous. We need community in order to develop and manage the resources we need to survive.

Well no, there's a difference between offgrid and alone and an offgrid commune.

The secret ingredient is communalism.

Agreed, I'm a fan of village-regional center structure myself.

Oh, to be a seamstress, stitching clothes for the farmer's infant son in exchange for a sack of wheat and 6 ounces of butter

Hate to ask what you'd need to do for a steak.. 🤐

The current infant-clothes to steak exchange rate is unfavorable. It would be wiser to hold off till the late autumn, when steak futures usually fall and clothing values skyrocket.

Reasonable. See you in the back-40.

Yeah let's all go back to subsistence agriculture! Every time my mind wanders and I find myself romanticizing an age of simpler times and communal living I remind myself of the realities of that sort of lifestyle.

Well, why aren't we practicing that communal specialty into you know, bettering society from it's current dumpster fire state? Or is that just too tall of a task?

Humans usually live in peace in groups smaller than 18. Above that, troubles hints. @nieceandtows said 40 &up here ... i like (her//his) comment.

Thanks 😀 I found it here :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number

...group sizes between 69–109 and 16–42, respectively. However, enormous 95% confidence intervals (4–520 and 2–336, respectively) ...

Also, we're living in kind of an unprecedented part of history that enables is to be independent of other people in ways never before possible. So that gives people a very distorted sense of that, a lack of any notion of the importance of community. And of course this "independence" is achieved by a complete dependence on this huge ubiquitous economic machine.

I think sometimes it's the extreme dependence that makes the attempt at off the grid freedom seem more attractive; it's weird how the technology seems to both take away so much freedom and yet make people feel independent at the same time

theres a reason why banishment was historically a death sentence. It took communities to prosper!

It's dangerous to go full off the grid, but in reality it's never complete isolation. In Leave No Trace/My Abandonment (based on a true story) the father relied on disability checks to buy goods and educated his daughter using encyclopedias.. In Walden Thorough is living alone in a remote area, but it's not like he's completely cut off from the benefits of society and has visitors somewhat regularly. I think there's a difference between trying to minimize the brunt of society 24/7 vs going full isolation.

I'm a world of growing instability where the inputs for modern lifehave their supply consistency threatened, learning some basic survival skills is not a bad thing. Many countries will likely have huge energy, food, and water shortfalls in the coming years. Germany is burning what amounts to wet coal to make up for losing Russian oil. Ukraine was one of the world's biggest wheat producers. Russia produced a lot of the world's fertilizer. There are reasons to learn how to live without the entire support network most of us take for granted.

Though you should be pretty decent at living off grid before commiting to it.

Don't assume that you're cougar-proof or that 40°F and below weather with no real insulation is something you can save yourself from with enough bootstraps.

I feel for the kid, who got dragged down by the hubris of his mom. It's troubling that we've grown so disconnected from the world we've built; we dont feel like we benefit from it at all. We can all sit here and shame this mother for being neglectful and stupid, and yet the feelings she had of a chaotic life with no upside...that's so fucking common right now.

Its a commonly floated idea among my circles, and by me personally, that we kinda just want to fuck off and build a comfy commune somewhere not too hot, not too cold, just away from cities, and try to be as self-sufficient as possible. Just a small group of friends and family. It's kinda what I'm saving up for, if I'm honest, because buying a city house is just.... Prohibitively expensive for what it is.

Probably easier to survive in a commune of a few dozen than it would be in tents with 3 people. But yeah I think a lot of us have had dreams of fucking off to the wilds to live like a hermit.

I would probably last like 3 days and only if I'm being extremely optimistic.

I mean, we kind of did this with lemmy right? Same thing with people escaping British rule to come to USA?

The problem is that 'we' didn't build this world. Our society was (is) shaped by people who's situation and life experience have very little in common with the average person, and yet we continue to let them shape policy to their own benefit and our detriment because... money? Or something? Idk.

Into the Wild was a cautionary tail that for some reason people romanticize...

The difference between what I took away when I first read that book and the 2nd or 3rd time I watched the movie was night and day.

I feel bad the kid he had a privileged shit life. But going out into the middle of the Alaskan wilderness to survive with no formal training was punching way above his weight...

The thing that dawned on me when I watched it as an older adult was his sheer selfishness. Smug, cliched little prick. His father's violence aside, what about the rest of his family?

Except he dies alone at the end, so it was definitely a cautionary tale.

This is sort of like saying Don Quixote was about a famous knight saving the world and not a crazy rich guy fighting windmills

Except he dies alone at the end, so it was definitely a cautionary tale.

If the last recent years has taught us anything, it's that how you present a thing matters a lot more than what the thing is that's actually being presented. Unfortunately.

Pretty much, which is why I consider the Fight Club movie a complete flop, maybe not financially, but it fails at its own message so hard that only the dudebros it mocks like it.

that only the dudebros it mocks like it.

or, hear me out, movies don't need to be lectures and is ok to just do something for the entertainment/artistry/visuals/storytelling of it.

I can tell you that I'm the opposite of what the movie depicts, I'm fragile, never been in a fight, I sincerely hope that will never be in one, I cried like a baby in ET or the time traveles wife, the Schindler's list broke my heart, I dislike the dudebro dynamics, and I adore that movie. I also like horror movies as a genre and I don't go around killing people.

It's fine that you use movies as lectures of life and ethics, or that you don't enjoy them if they don't have a message that you agree with, but some people like them for other reasons, so please try not to profile people for what they like to watch.

It's not that I dislike Fight Club for "not having a message", but for the fact that it's meant to have a message according to the director and the writer of the book, but the movie doesn't depict what that message is very well.

sorry I wasn't clear, my criticism wasn't towards you not liking the movie, anyone have their own taste and there is nothing wrong with it, we all just want to enjoy things :-)

My problem was about you profiling people that do like the movie as "dudebros", that wasn't very nice IMHO

That was rude of me, let me rephrase.

There are many things in Fight Club that are enjoyable, snappy dialogue, clever moments (I wonder if beating the shit out of yourself in a CEO's office just as security arrives to create an awkward situation has any chance of working irl)

However, the film has attracted a rather toxic cult following that seem to think Tyler Durden's the good guy.. and sadly the film's most vocal fans are from this group.

I personally have seen the flick twice and did not much care for it myself, just for the record (So you don't get the impression I judge the film's quality solely on this subgroup)

thanks for the clarification, I appreciate it :-) . I have quite the opposite experience, as people I know like it are mostly cinema enthusiast and like it mostly for its cinematic features, definitely not a teaching film.

Maybe is a geographical thing, although to be fair I would never have a friend so full of himself as Tyler, so I may have a selection bias.

For me was the presentation of Marla that I remember the most, such interesting way of introducing a character.

anyway, have a nice day!

What a terrible way to go. They sounded less prepared than even Chris McCandless.

I can't believe I'm recommending reality TV, but Alone is a fairly good representation of being alone in the wilderness with no resources. It is extremely unpleasant.

Alone is a great show. But I’ve got to tell you, while I watch and know I do not (currently) possess the skills to do what those folks do, there is a draw for me to want to do it. I mean I’m sure I’m over-romanticizing the thing to an extent, and - again - I know enough about me to know I can’t do it today, but there’s a distinct pull to want to.

.

I did a wilderness survival camp in Arizona as a kid myself. I have had massive respect for nature ever since then. Even with a group of people survival in the wilderness is tough. I remember struggling for days to even make my first fire.

Alone showed me how different survival tactics are depending on your location. I feel like I could survive at least a few months on my own in the Sonoran desert, but anywhere else I would be done for pretty quickly. Cold snowy weather would probably end me on the first night.

.

https://youtu.be/PK2SMIOHYig

Love this video essay related to this topic

I think many people have that pull to nature, but most that do it and survive recognize that living without the infrastructure of the rest of humanity is at least extremely challenging and so will thoroughly prepare.

I would guess a good portion of US adults, these days, have no idea how to survive away from modern convenience for any length of time

How did they leave a car at a campsite for months and not have any kind of search and rescue triggered?

My buddy got lost on a trail once and had to do an shitty night out in the woods, the next morning there were forest service personnel out looking for him because they spotted his car parked overnight with no camp permit posted.

I thought this was standard practice at every national and state park. An unattended vehicle is seen as a sure sign that someone is in trouble. I guess I’m never going hiking in Colorado, cause if I get in trouble the CO forest personnel are apparently just going to leave me for dead.

Yeah, that's insane. Also, now I know where to go if I ever need to store my vehicle for extended periods of time!

From what I've read they weren't in a sanctioned Park, this was more of a back country area tucked away in the woods.

You're right... National Forest... Not a park

The forest service is still supposed to check for abandoned vehicles overnight, as is the best way to check for lost hikers

It wasn't a park, so unless someone filed a missing person report the car itself wouldn't necessarily trigger anything since people abandon all kinds of crazy shit on national forests.

They must have made some sort of effort to hide the vehicle, or park it somewhere it wouldn't be questioned for some time. If the goal is to get away from people, you don't want your vehicle to cause someone to come looking for you.

Why didn't they just get back in the car and head back to civilization?

Probably froze overnight while sleeping. Between hypothermia and malnutrition, sometimes people just never wake up.

The roads would have gotten buried with snow. One snowy day would do it. By the time they realized it, too late. Those forest service roads are not plowed.

I feel like too many people do not respect nature. They romanticize it, and that’s a very dangerous thing. They forget that you need actual skills to survive in the wild. This didn’t have to happen.

That has gotten worse with all the "survivalist" shows acting like its easy to survive with just a knife and fig leaf in the wild.

They see a show grab some gear and off they go. Not realizing those shows are often fake and when not, the star has many years of actual experience and training.

I'm a huge fan of Alone, but would never in a million years think I could do it. Those people are literally survival teachers or Bushmen/women who have done this their entire lives and even then only make it 20 or so days before calling to gtfo.

This is incredibly sad.

The contestants also get regular medical checkins and emergency locaters.

Yep!

I didn't watch a lot of him but I enjoyed Les Stroud's Survivorman.

Red in tooth and claw...

I'd say they increased their distress, they were naive too. Living off the land is a major commitment and requires skill and knowledge. People in the past still used trade and tribes to survive that way. Even back then they didn't try to live in something as flimsy as a tent. Also, going 100% solo was a death sentence. Reminds me of Chris McCandless ("Into the Wild").

Sounds tough. I dont even know how to find and catch wild ramens.

I heard you can get spaghetti from trees in some places

Italy duh

That's easy. Set up camp and just hike over to Italy.

Reminds me of the Netflix series Alone. Only one out of ~12 people make it to 100 days, and they're all experienced survivalists

Sounds like this wasn’t thought through and was perhaps an emotional decision. True off-grid living takes lots of knowledge and prep. Surviving 100 days is basically conservation of resources to last till the e d. Off grid still requires shelter and resources.

For once though, their motives seem more noble/less crazy than most of the headlines. Heck, a bunch of us are here on Lemmy cause we got fed up with a system and want something better. At least they wanted something better.

I thought about going off grid in a house with a well, solar, and storage batteries. The price looked good.

Even with the house it was too marginal. One anomalous weather event would have been RIP.

I knew a guy who went to Montana to try the "cabin off the grid" life. He said we was drinking before noon after a few weeks and was in danger of becoming an alcoholic out of boredom so he moved back.

I could see that. I think the off the grid thing has been glorified by people who haven't actually done it.

I mean, Id like to run off into the hills sometimes, but I'd probably run right back due to some combination of boredom, weather, starvation, and running out of alcohol.

Can confirm, live in Montana. Cabins are great...during the summer months. Winter rolls around and you better be prepared to be cut off from everything for a few months. Plus it's cold as fuck. Last year where I live, we consistently saw -20F and stayed below 0F for weeks at a time. Winter here sucks, but it keeps out the riff raff for the most part ;)

The tent was what got me. A fatal choice. Tragic, but avoidable.

Another article I read stated that the incomplete beginnings of a lean-to or similar shelter were present at the camp, seems like they tried to build something more permanent but ran out of energy to finish it. Which is why you build your shelter first.

Once I watched a season of alone I dropped all illusions about running into the woods to live the naturalist life.

If anyone is thinking "lol I could do that" just watch alone, it is HARD out there in the wilds.

In the show Alone the take away is that fat beats skills. All of the super fit "survival experts" with 5% body fat are being carried out on stretchers in a couple of weeks. The 300lb dude with minimal skills out lasts all of the experts.

The environment just doesn't have enough fat calories available. Skill won't change this.

For the first few seasons sure but that Jordan guy that won season 6 was all skill and attitude.

Is he the guy that killed an elk?

If you can’t at the very least identify what mushrooms you can or can not eat in the forest, you should not go out there to live. I 100% can not, so my dumb ass will never try to go live off grid out in the woods. I can’t find food and I acknowledge that. More folks need to realize their limitations.

For most of us, going to live in "the wild" is as preposterous as us returning to the oceans we crawled out of eons ago. We've evolved past that, and are no longer suited for that environment, at least not naturally anyway.

I built a submarine, would you like to go die explore the depths of the ocean with me?

Sure, I'll bring the chips to go with the human salsa we'll turn into.

For real though, they are straight up experts, and after 60 days, 90% of them are on the verge of death lol

Bullet points of what's the ass kicker?

  • Maintaining a balance of calories in vs out is really hard. In particular fats are extremely difficult to acquire.
  • Getting almost anything done requires hard manual labor, which means you need even more calories.
  • Harsh winters mean food scarcity and burning even more calories just keeping warm.
  • You're completely fucked if you get sick or injured.
  • Boredom, loneliness and stress could drive you insane.

Can you expand on why fats are harder to acquire? The most immediate method I can think of is from hunting and trapping. Is this very difficult to do from a practical point of view?

Do you know how to hunt or set traps? Do you know how to butcher an animal without nicking a bowel and tainting the meat? Most folks don’t. I know I don’t. I would die if left out in the woods and having to fend for myself.

I can do most of that. Still would probably die due to falling from a cliff or shit.

Also tbh I'm highly pharmacodependant.

It's weird to me people who think they could or want to attempt to survive doing those things every. single. day. by themselves. I've done everything you've mentioned, as well as foraged for whatever couldn't kill me or eat me first, bugs included. It's not fun, it's fucking brutal work and you spend most of your day hungry unless you find a good, consistent source of calories and clean water. You're still fucked though if you live anywhere that gets a real winter, break a bone, get an infection, run into an animal that's just as hungry as you are. Humans aren't equipped to survive alone for very long.

Fair enough. Even if you do end up killing something, you might not have the skills to safely prepare it for consumption.

Unless you are a skilled and experienced hunter and trapper, game is quite difficult to acquire. Especially if modern hunting and trapping equipment is not available.

All the bullet points, there's a reason we've moved society in the direction we have. Everything from shoes to showers makes life tolerable.

People like to idealise primitive lifestyles. But when actual primitives are given a choice, they always choose civilization, despite the drawbacks.

If they had read a few more books on survival, this would have been prevented.

Usually those books tell you that you need provisions through winter and if you don't, you need to get those provisions from someplace.

Nobody typically lives 100% off the grid the first year or more unless they're a super expert.

You also need someone who isn't with you to know where you are and arrange check-ins of some sort, or at least give them a time frame of when they can expect to hear from you again if all is well.

...the whole family?

Like, one didn't die and the rest of them didn't go "hmm this isn't a good idea..."???

Looks like it was probably from hypothermia or malnourishment or a bit of both. They could have died the same night, very sad.

The fact that a hiker found one and the other two weren't found until the next day makes me think that one left to try and get help, froze to death, and the other 2 died waiting.

Apparently this was during winter. If they got hit by bad weather unprepared, they might not have had any options left once they realized they were fucked.

Believe in many stupid trending ideas and you will end up killing yourself and your family. This is not the first time and it will happen again.

Indeed... this is a major life change, not just a "we'll pop off the grid for a week to chill out and definitely not die of botulism".

First rule of the Rocky's, don't camp / hike outside in the winter, you will not survive.

Even with a well-stocked cabin, the cold alone will sap your energy and kill you slowly.

Trying to survive it in a tent isn't mere ignorance, it's outright stupidity.

I just feel bad for the kid. Mom wanted to get off the grid but Colorado has a history of killing those who try it without a lot of money and infrastructure to support it. Go off the grid in like South Carolina, not Colorado.

Lol this is ridiculous. I’ve been hiking in the Rockies plenty of times during the winter, as long as you take the proper precautions you will be fine.

ya right lool

i live in the mountains of CO. i sometimes wish the cold killed more consistently. we'd be a little less crowded

That's... a concerning viewpoint. You doing ok there buddy?

That's rather silly, as long as people can hear you shouting it's almost always going to be safe no matter what you do.

"How long were they out there, sheriff?"

"I'd say 2... Maybe 3 hours?"

They started out in late summer. In an area with very cold winters. I'm no brainiac, but even to me this seems like poor planning.

Like an episode of Alone, but without the planning, support and logistics.

ie the important parts

c/thatsthejoke

Dark thought, but maybe that was the plan.

Imagine not giving up when out of food and cold

Imagine not giving up when out of food and cold

Running out of food would bother me more than running out of cold

With the way climate change is going, we'll be running out of cold pretty soon.

running out of cold

Lmao

During winter, in bad weather it might take a while to get back to civilization if you are somewhere out there. I mean sure you should always plan for stuff like that and be prepared (and look for help well before running out), but this really wasn't a well planned thing from the start.

Technically, they’re still off the grid.

Maybe under it?

I understand many people are frightened in this strange world, but this is outright murder-suicide by stupidity. The kid didn't know what's happening to him. Don't run away, change the world. Or -at least- try to.

Extremely predictable outcome of extremely stupid choices.

I don't think living "off-the-grid" is a stupid choice, but doing so without planning and preparation is just plain irresponsible.

When people successfully live off the grid they do it by essentially making their own grid.

People's obsession with "off grid" really demonstrates a lack of gratitude for everything that society provides.

It's essentially the modern adult version of running away as a child.

I think running away as a child can be a very different situation than you imagine. "Running away" to the local park or your friend's house after a disagreement with your parents, sure. But a lot of kids run away because their basic needs aren't being met or they are being abused. Kids shouldn't be expected to be able to weigh the consequences of leaving a home with resources to avoid abuse, but adults should absolutely be expected to weigh the consequences of leaving society.

I completely understand your point and will agree that many people take our day to day luxuries for granted, but society is just as capable of constantly beating you down and taking from you as much as it provides.

I can't blame anyone for trying to "disappear", but at least do some extensive planning.

For most people, it’s going to be tough. It takes a very high level of dedication and skills.

Are you trying to "well, actually" me? There were a myriad of choices made here, all under the guise of "living off the grid." I very specifically used a plural word, not a singular one. Choices. All of them stupid, including the one you protest as not stupid. It is made stupid by way of their sheer incompetence, unpreparedness, lack of education and training in the matter, and their sheer stubbornness to not call it quits when reality descended upon them.

Your reply is coming across as needlessly aggressive, but I'm not sure if I'm just projecting my years of Reddit interaction onto you. I had no ill intentions when I replied to your initial post, only wanted to offer my two cents on a public forum, which in this case was making a distinction as to what is considered stupid in this context. To further clarify, what I posted was not a protest and was an opinion meant to further the discussion.

"Living off the grid" can also be referred to as self-sustainable living and it seems to be growing in popularity as modern society becomes more exclusive, artificial, and unhealthy. Taking the knowledge you've gained and skills you've learned in order to live sustainably by yourself in nature, away from the bullshit of modern life is, personally, not stupid, which was the original point I was trying to make. But, as you mentioned, it is when people decide to just quit everything because they had a bad day, but have no tools or skills to survive that is very ill-informed to say the least.

I feel like Humans don't understand how fragile we are

They should all have Fragile branded on their foreheads at birth.

Think they rule the world and then a tiny mosquito wipes them out.

Starvation and cold. So sad

Well, I guess the world no longer distress them :/

Just heartbreaking!

amprim go brrr

Of course you couldn't resist blaming white people for this. Actually sad because I agree with the rest, but what do race have to do with that? such an American thing.

Have you ever been to the US? Do you know anything about our history? Race and class are so deeply intertwined in this country, it's going to take a lot more than some non-Americans mad on the internet, telling us to just quit bringing up race, to fix it.

And don't mistake this as excusing our deeply ingrained racism, I just tire of people who have never spent a day in the US thinking that if we just "stop talking about race" then all of our race issues will magically go away, when it's just not that simple.

White man bad

I don't think questioning racializing something as arbitrary as living off grid amounts to the same thing as "just stop talking about race." That's either really misunderstood or just a bad faith argument.

Poor people can't "live off the grid". Only people with money and privilege can do so, and in the US, such people are disproportionately white. I don't think I misunderstood anything or am acting in bad faith.

Ah, actually there are places where many people live like that. I know such places (one, namely republic of Artsakh, has become worse in the last couple of years due to partially being occupied by savage racist apes thinking it's inside their "territorial integrity").

It's just that this requires a set of skills most don't possess, having grown in big cities or places not too different from big cities for this purpose.

EDIT: About "level of decision" - nothing really prevents you from gaining the same. Just going to live "off the grid" with pretty much "on the grid" mindset is something leftists do more. Being prepared and having technical means to get to a doctor is important.

It's just that this requires a set of skills most don't possess

Thank you. I hate these comments implying that this is one hundred percent impossible or even that you need to be a rich person to accomplish it. I did it for a short time. But I went to town to get water and food, it's not like you need to have every single thing be completely self sustaining (you can, but it's not like it "doesn't count" if you go get something). It was uncomfortable and hard, but that also contributed to what made it so rewarding. It was one of the best times in my life.

It is stupid to try to live in the wild without knowing what you're doing though. The area I was in had good weather, close to a town etc. It wasn't at the top of a mountain or anything.

So sad but at the same time LOfuckingL are people dumb!

They had a 14-year old kid with them. That poor kid didn't deserve to have been led to his death because of the adults he had no choice but to depend on.

Are you more angry at the people trying to escape the crazy system than you are at the system that drove them out?

Is it a contest? Can't you be angry at both the system and people endangering their children and that is enough?

Do you get mad at rabbits that run away from dogs and into the line of fire of the hunter?

Humans are not rabbits. What a terrible analogy. I get mad at any human that intentionally endangers their child. I don't know why you don't object to child abuse.

If you can't understand the metaphor for what it is, then you're below the threshold for understanding how a person living under a constant threat of starvation and death might make poor decisions. I think we're done here. Don't bother me again.

You could at least pretend not to be insufferable.

Can you?

Every god damn day. "Nu uh, you" seems very on brand though.

Is this you being less insufferable?

I appreciate the attempt.

Personal attacks deserve an equally mature response.

The adult who dragged a kid along was trying to create her own system, which undeniably isolated him, subjected him to suffering, and killed him, so yeah I'm angry at that on his behalf.

She was afraid, ignorant, and uneducated. How do you think she got that way?

Well she's from Colorado springs so I'm going to guess a steady diet of conservative propaganda..

Loss of community, loss of meaningful labor, American healthcare, probably underpaid, socially outcast, etc... Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

Where are you getting all this information about these hardships she faced? It's certainly not in the article, so are you just making shit up?

What reality do you live in where you don't face the same hardships? Maybe your struggles aren't as extreme, but those threats are always lying in wait to ruin your happy little life.

So no source then, just making shit up.

Oh, you're right! She must have abandoned her life to live in the woods because she was bored of her upper middle class existence! Fucking dolt.

Don't be mad at me because you can't source your bullshit

She got that way because you personally didn't teach her a better way of living. You're personally responsible for these deaths, including that of the child.

Why, why would you do this, TrismegistusMx? Why? Why?

Yes, because they died in an incredibly predictable way by going out unprepared and they brought a kid to die with them.

They thought they were going to be killed by capitalism in decline.

Because they were idiots who didn't realize how they would definitely die in nature without society to protect them.

Many people die in society as a direct result of the way society is. Are they also idiots, or are you the idiot for judging victims of oppression?

Everybody dies in nature.

Not true. There are homeless people and homesteaders living in nature all around the globe. If you put most of them in downtown LA, many of them would likely die in a matter of days or weeks. People can acclimate to extreme circumstances if they are given a chance to learn.

They thought wrong, obviously.

They likely would have died in society as well, from poverty, cancer, addiction, or suicide. They were drowning in one world so they sought refuge in another. There was no happy ending in wait.

They likely would have died in society as well, from poverty, cancer, addiction, or suicide

Lol great rational for killing your kid. They could possibly, maybe, die anyway so better just get it over with right? She was an idiot and her stupidity lead to the death of an innocent child.

You seem very eager to justify this tragedy as if it was inevitable, and not the result of very avoidable choices. Are you okay?

That's your strawman argument, not related to anything I've said.

The same system that provides antibiotics? Have you ever grown food? It's a lot harder than buying it at the store, even when you include the time spent working at a minimum wage job.

Nature is brutal and unforgiving, these idiots did not begin to respect it.

They could never have survived without society to care for them, the proof is that they didn't.

The system that provides soap, food, internet, cops, homelessness, poverty, fentanyl, prisons, slavery, inequality, racism, sex discrimination, poor education, and horrendous working conditions.

They were ignorant about nature the same way you seem to be ignorant about society. Both of you risk your lives on a daily basis dealing with SYSTEMS you don't understand.

It's just the luck of the draw that you can sit there in high judgement and talk mad shit.

Nature provides less, most of us probably wouldn't make it through childhood.

Not true at all. There are abundant resources in nature, but most people lack the knowledge to make use of them.

Such a victim.

You make foolish assumptions. I'm a homeowner, a veteran, and a registered nurse. I recognize suffering because I devote every day to helping sufferers. One doesn't need to be a victim to have empathy.

Nobody drove them out. This was a decision she made on her own accord and by her own free will.

Her free will to run away from a system she perceived as a threat. Are you saying that you've been totally comfortable the last 4 years and never once considered the collapse of the system being a threat to your loved ones?

I think there are a lot of threats in the world, I think climate change might also be a threat.

I don't stake myself out in the antarctic in response.

Your response might be better than theirs, but you could be on the chopping block tomorrow as well. You're still blaming the oppressed for the conditions set by their oppressors.

You're gonna need to identify these oppressors if you want anybody to humor this ridiculous argument.

They're directing action at the top of every hierarchy enforced by violence. If you stop playing stupid you can figure it out for yourself. Many of them are on TV daily advocating for genocide or explaining why kids should starve with a grandfatherly smile. Talk about fucking ridiculous. We can't have a conversation if you deny reality.

You still need to define these people. Who are "they" in this statement?

No, I don't. You need to define "they" for yourself before you spend the rest of your life defending your oppressors. All I need to do is hit the mute button.

No, that's not how it works, my guy. You're the one making a claim that somebody else forced this upon them, the burden of proof is on you. I'm not gonna build your own argument for you.

All this snide little "you know who" shit has me feeling like you're about two comments away from somehow blaming this on Jews or something.

Are you saying that you’ve been totally comfortable the last 4 years and never once considered the collapse of the system being a threat to your loved ones?

Of course I'm not saying that. But I never once thought to myself "Know what would make this situation better? Starving myself and my family in the cold wilderness that none of us are prepared to endure."

That thought was something she considered and acted upon. It's not your fault for having such thoughts, but acting on them is always your fault. Nobody told her "You need to take your family into the mountains, or else". She did that to herself.

Ah, so you're projecting your insecurity on them by taking satisfaction in the idea that their way of coping with the collapse of the system got them killed, so you're obviously more in control. If you get cancer from corporate pollution and poor food quality, there's nothing you could have done. If you get hit by a car, it's luck of the draw. If a Republican president outlaws your way of life, that's just the way it is. But since they're dead, they were obviously at fault.

Where did I say any of that?

Ironic accusing me of projecting, though.

“Know what would make this situation better? Starving myself and my family in the cold wilderness that none of us are prepared to endure.” Your strawman arguments know your motivations better than you do.

Yes, a senseless death due to Ill preparation

How would they prepare for economic collapse and the rise of fascism? They took a risk, but they might have just accelerated the inevitable.

They didn't take a risk. Taking a risk means preparing for situations and dealing with them as they come up, and what happens happens. This lady prepared nothing. This is more like resting in the shade of the anvil suspended by twine in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. She walked out into the woods to die and just didn't know it. It's an awful story, she obviously didn't feel she had options, but a little bit of reading or video would show a person very quickly that they needed more preparation than the deceased put in to have any hope it surviving an alpine winter.

Edit: grammar

Leaving or not leaving your bed is a risk. Preparation has nothing to do with it. They obviously weren’t prepared for living in late-stage capitalism either. You’re falling victim to the just-world fallacy.

That's just plain ignorant.

There's no "system."

Me: Gestures to everything.

Oh, sure. There's absolutely no reason for anybody to be dissatisfied by the current system. Everything is pretty much perfect!

Says the guy who's trying to argue that there's no global system that disenfranchises people.

Who used the word "force?" The system is coercive and entropic. Work where you're allowed until you die. You get paid what you are allotted. Your value is based on your job and your ability to earn. If you're a woman or a minority, you're second class. Police budgets grow and enforcement becomes more violent every year. Politicians and CEOs are working together to exploit your labor until you die early from chronic disease.

I didn't think I had to break it down as if I was explaining to a child, but here we are. Now pretend like you don't understand why she ran.

Yeah, I'm the dunce here. Dunning-Kruger Club, represent.

Oh my, finally a subinstance drama 🍿