-16
5

YSK chemtrails were real according to the US Army Chemical Corps, and this is the type of plane they used

10mon 3d ago by sh.itjust.works/u/Varyk in youshouldknowfacts@sh.itjust.works from sh.itjust.works

Chemtrails, trails of aerosolized chemicals secretly released from aircraft over civilian populations, were dispersed without consent or warning over US cities and towns in the early 1950s.

The US Army Chemical Corps conducted Operation LAC(Large Area Coverage), a program to test what it would be like to drop extremely dangerous bioweapons over enemy cities by dropping less dangerous carcinogens like zinc cadmium sulfide(ZnCdS), over US civilian populations without knowledge or consent, and without following up on the long-term health effects of dropping ZnCdS on US civilian populations.

The Army said the carcinogen was probably not harmful before dispersal, but no human trials were done

NIH recommends the Army conduct tests on the toxicity of ZnCdS since it can get stuck in the lungs

The Army was like, nah.

broad overview

YSK because as nonsensical as some later chemtrail theories became, the conspiracy of secret chemicals dropped from aircraft onto US civilians without knowledge or consent did occur, according to the US government and military branches that conducted the tests.

Chemtrails have been confirmed by the US government and are recorded military history.

Please provide your evidence or your comments will be removed via rule #1.

that does not refute the US army chemical corps documented record of operation LAC, during which aerosolized chemicals were released by aircraft over civilian populations without knowledge or consent.

"It's literally just a cloud"

those "clouds" released over civilian populations in operation large area coverage without knowledge or consent were composed of nickel cadmium sulfide, a carcinogen.

you have no evidence refuting the documented historical fact of Operation Large Area Coverage, and I will have to remove your post for disinformation.

again, your evidence did nothing to refute the US government's record of project LAC, links of which are provided above.

nothing theoretical here.

rule #1 is to provide evidence for your claims.

please note rule #5 as well, which is to be civil to others.

This community did get popular pretty quick!

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to remove your comment under rule 5.