tech never works for long
1mon 28d ago by lemmy.blahaj.zone/u/not_IO in programmer_humor@programming.dev from lemmy.blahaj.zoneswap out those mechanicals windows for mechanical linux and then we'll talk
I use Arch BTW.
Like just huge arches instead of windows or even doors, Arch is all you need.
I thought Emacs is all you need?

Real programmers use memes to program the machines of the world.
Tfw you come to your first day of work in critical infrastructure to maintain drivers and highly critical network applications and they're all written in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOLCODE
Just play Zork all day until you get fired. They'll think you're coding!
Incorrect, you need

According to this documentary, you're wrong!
I never thought about how a physical arch relates to physical windows. Interesting.
I am more of a hydraulic Linux person myself
You must feel compressed.
That's pneumatic Linux, though.
Actually it's GNUmatic Linux.
Likely not, the whole point of hydraulics is that the fluid is non-compressible!
In Spanish, we have a saying: "En casa de herrero, cuchara de palo".
A rough translation would be "in the blacksmith's house you'll find wood spoons". It's not a new thing, it's been like that since ancient times.
Is that the same thing? The impression I get is that OPs post is about the IT worker actively distrusting smart tech. While I assume your example is more that the blacksmith doesn't bother with making metal spoons for himself and using what ever he had already, which would be more comparable to a network engineer still using the ISPs shitty router.
We use it when, for any reason, a person who could easily use something related to their field, doesn't use it. What it means is that if someone who could be using something because they know how it works, isn't using it, there must be a reason.
Ahh, the impression I got is that one makes it sound like they are avoiding it because they can't be bothered to while the other actively avoids it because its bad.
I think that is the most "correct" interpretation of it. Maybe they're saying that it's been bent over time.
We have a similar saying in Denmark, something like "shoemakers kids always have holes in their shoes" but in this case it's more about that the people in the profession don't prioritize their own craft. I've seen this with electricians where whole house is done but electrical sockets aren't installed but for IT I think it's more about distrust towards developers (takes one to know one)
Wooden spoons are better for cooking with cast iron pots and pans, which a blacksmith, being knowledgeable about metal, would be vey aware of.
Just as the it person is way more aware of the pitfalls of smart tech than your average person
I thought it was just teflon that is too weak to handle metal tools.
Metal tools also scrape the bottom lining that forms over time off, which is a big no no when cooking with cast iron.
The seasoning? I seriously doubt that. People seem to think cast iron is more vulnerable than it is. You can wash it, too, just dry it off after.
Whatever man, the wooden spoons taste better i guess, that's the reason now
Are you sure? I've often heard chainmail recommended to clean cast iron.
P sure (but not entirely) that thats for when you purposely want to remove the lining, fx for resale, to make it look brand new
Havent personally heard chainmail reccomended tho, mostly heard of steel sponges, chainmail sounds way cooler tho lol
Depends how hard you scrape. Steel sponges with a lot of force will take you down to metal, chainmail might work nicely for cleaning stuck on food without damaging the coating too much but I haven't used it.
Metal tools you need to really scrape at it to remove the coating, I don't think it is something you could do by mistake.
Makes sense! All this is secondhand knowledge from a bunch of friends who are cooks for a living, so not based on any personal experiences, maybe probably should've clarified that earlier lol
Sure but what us the downside? It us a huge field with everything from local to requiring the cloud. You can't blanket it all together.
"The cobbler's kids have no shoes" in English.
But this guy is saying he doesn't trust technology not to spy or be vulnerable.
Yeah but I doubt that saying has ever been used to mean the blacksmith thinks metal spoons are bad. Right?
It's worth sharing but this post is more about the software engineer knows how much shit is spying on you.
It implies worse though, doesn't have to be bad. Worse gets deprecated just the same.
That ks for sharing this, this is fascinating.
Maybe the underlying rule is: the more you know about something, the more you are aware of its flaws, making the alternatives you know less about more attractive?
I think there are definitely different applications of the phrase and different versions of it.
As someone that does a "traditional" trade. I do work in leathercraft. My friends and family all have nice pieces I've made them. I've literally yet to make myself more than a belt. And it's just a piece I didn't like enough when it was done. So I remade another for the person I meant to give it to.
Not that I wouldn't like a nice piece for myself. But, it's just a lot more fun to make something for someone else.
Homeassistant is cool though. Also most of my stuff would work without it, they just works better with it.
None of the devices I bought for it talk to the internet! Home assistant can control and even update the Shellys completely over the local network.
As it should be
Any suggestions for someone tech savvy enough to run a proxmox server for a handful of services, to get started with home assistant?
Can you replicate something like a Google home with voice commands?
I may or may not be getting a new house soon. I'm good with electrical to replace switches with wireless ones. But what do you get? Where do you start and where do you end? What about the WAF?
I saw LTT did smart switches in his house and it was a mess of incompatibilities.
Any good resources? I don't even know what I don't know haha
Look into ZWave and ZigBee mesh networks. I run Home Assistant with a couple hundred devices and integrations. ZWave tends to be my hardwired switches, and ZigBee tends to be my battery operated motion sensors, remotes, etc.
Personally, I run Home Assistant on its native HAOS on a raspberry Pi. In addition to Home Assistant, I have lots of automations running in Node Red, a no/low code orchestration addon.
For voice control, I’m playing with the Atom Echo.
Couple hundred?! Are most of those lights or something? Forgive me I’m totally ignorant about home automation.
Is it a hobby to you or have you found significant time/energy savings? Or both?
Part hobby, part time and energy savings. One thing I love about Home Assistant is the integrations with so many devices and services. I have smart switches., remotes, smart plugs, energy monitors, RGB bulbs, thermometers, etc.
It’s a slippery slope of wanting to integrate absolutely everything! My doorbell, alarm system, thermostats, garage door, door locks, and so on.
Many are local “smart devices” using ZWave and ZigBee, and others are cloud integrations with other services.
I’ve gotten to a point where the Home Automation routines I rely on are so useful that I get annoyed if I ever have to do things “manually”.
Couple examples:
-
I have a remote by my bed that, when the goodnight button is pressed, turns off all the lights, sets the HVAC back to programmed mode, puts our computers to sleep, arms the alarm, locks the doors, and closes curtains.
-
I have a button by my garage door that sets an “auto arm” toggle that opens the garage door, unlocks the door to the garage and the waits for me to close the garage, at which point it arms the alarm, turns off the lights, locks my computers, turns off the HVAC, closes curtains, locks doors, etc.
That’s pretty dope and I see how it could actually really help my ADHD if I had an “everything off” button. Thanks for replying.
This video is a good starting point. If you're already running proxmox you're definitely ready. 👍
HAOS literally has a proxmox iso for home assistant. Slap that baby on.
There are homebrew voice units, but you'll need a beefier system than normal to process in house. If you have apple devices you can expose certain elements from HA to apple home (and keep others obscured) to use your watch / voice etc.
There are a lot of home assistant communities and they are all very very friendly. It's a massive learning curve and we're all working together
Define beefy? Like 8 to 12gb vram? Or will an old 970 do the trick?
I really only skimmed over it before deciding IDGAF at this point (i'll probably revisit later, but in the middle of renovations and kittens right now) but https://www.home-assistant.io/voice_control/voice_remote_local_assistant/should set you right
Thanks!
I'd recommend using matter over thread, as I've had issues with ZigBee, although that might just be incompetence. I use smth by aqara for a thread bridge, and it all works great with home assistant.
Community scripts has home assistant, both lxc and VM options. Use the VM version and you can get HA up and running super quick.
https://community-scripts.org/
Also shout out to community scripts! If you run proxmox and aren't using community scripts then you're about to hate yourself for all the manual builds you've done.
Fuck. I almost wish I didn’t read this.
I have not been using community scripts, and I feel an amount of silly. Thanks!
I've been looking for some smart outlets, and it seems impossible to discover which ones can be used with normal well-known protocols and which can only be used through a phone app locked into a cloud service.
So, if I'm reading things right, anything that runs on Z-Wave or Zigbee will necessarily run locally, because those are mesh protocols?
Anyway, thanks a lot. Those are really simple keywords to check.
Yep.
My favorite smart outlet switch though was recently sold out and it’s an Aeotec smart switch 7. Zooz makes something similar though I think.
I’ve got it set up on Home Assistant so that whenever certain devices in my home are detected on or off via watt usage minimum changes I monitor on those smart switches, it toggles the Lutron Caseta (best smart light control there is) lights via commands for different rooms in my house.
I also have things like waterproof outdoor gate sensors made by Zooz that are smaller than a single stick of gum where the small flat watch battery in it lasts for almost a year and it will alert me when the gate opens or closes, but only when I’m a certain distance away from the house’s geofence I’ve set up.
You will also need an overall little USB stick to connect to your Home Assistant server device (like a NAS or Raspberry Pi) to control everything, but there’s one that’s made by Aeotec that does both Zigbee and Z-wave long range protocols. Z-Wave LR (long range) works really far too… like I think around a mile potentially, if you have a nice clear line of sight signal.
The Hook Up had a great video on this. He compared a lot of different options and ranks them based on functionality with and without internet.
Check out the new IKEA Matter over Thread stuff. They have two smart plugs (an indoor single plug and an outdoor double plug). You can flash one of the esp-idf example images to an ESP32-C6 and plug it into your HA server to turn it into a Thread Border Router for under $10. Everything on Thread uses a fully local encrypted mesh network that by default has no Internet access (leave NAT64 turned off in the HA border router add-on).
P.S.: Make sure to update the firmware on the devices (which HA can do), as several don't act as routing end devices until after the first upgrade.
I have several US V2 plugs from athom.tech and they work great via home assistant. They just sit on WiFi don't call home and are reliable through hoke assistant
Zigbee.
You will need an antenna /hub though. I use a sky connect antennae, it's all locked into my house.
If you have to go wifi, tplink /tapo literally have a "local only" mode when you firewall them out. The only issue is they warn you you can't operate them unless you're connected to your home wifi. Which is rather the point.
I agree when it comes to most "smart" home devices. However, I wired an ESP32 to my heat pump for remote control and automation, which has been absolutely fantastic. Also, I use a ton of ZigBee and zwave, since those are not "smart" by themselves and are local-only.
It's the cloud bullshit that always breaks and spies on users that I hate.
Yeah home built and programmed smart devices are the way to go. I'm addicted to the rush of making dumb appliances automated.
The smartphone controlled aircon for $150 extra? Slap a $4 Esp in that. $400 to get sleek control of your central heating? $4 Esp. Turn on the ice maker on the commute home? You guessed it, $4 Esp.
Where the hell are you getting 4 ESP. And no its not good for everything. I buy zwave switches and water sensors.
$2 is a normal price on Aliexpress for an Esp32 C3 super mini, $4 is almost expensive
Not the previous poster.
A simple ESP8266 module from AliExpress is less than $4 (an ESP12F module - which is the FCC certified one with most I/O ports available - is $2), can be programmed with Arduino, has WiFi and that is more than enough for wireless home automation peripherals that are not supposed to do lots of processing (it will still easilly fit a REST interface for automated control and even a web interface for user control alongside it).
That said, in order to power it unless you can somehow draw 3.3v from the device it's attached to, you actually need more parts and that'll add up to more than $4 unless you're doing it with batteries (and design and assemble your own voltage regulator circuit which is not that hard and is cheap, or maybe get a slightly more expensive ESP module that comes with voltage regulation) - this works fine if your device sleeps most of the time and just wakes up once in a while to check some data from a server holding instructions for it. For an always one device, best IMHO to use a 3.3V wall power adaptor, which will cost at least $6 from AliExpress.
The power considerations apply exactly the same for ESP32s.
I wanted to do ESPify my fume hood for some time now, but I don't really know where to start. Do you have some website/howto for me to get started? To be honest, I don't really care about smarting up the actual extraction part. I just want to turn on and off the lights without finding the non-illuminated touch button on the black glass. Who designs crap like that?
You need electrical experience, I wouldn't recommend anyone to work with high voltages unless they knew what they were doing. The method depends on the device, every one is different. For the aircon unit the esp is an internal remote, so I spent time decoding that model's IR codes and building a platform for reliable control via home assistant. I have fans around the house that use mains voltage motors with 3 speeds, those got an interlocked 3 channel relay board. The ice maker used digital logic, so the esp sits between the control board and the rest and intercepts button presses to keep track of state and the injects its own commands for remote control(not my work). If you are lucky there will be a guide on the internet you can apply to your specific device, otherwise you'll have to work the project out solo from smaller guides.
I just wanted to interfere with the button board, I'd guess this will run on 3.3 or 5 volts. Simulate the touch events so to speak.
Yeah so you'd probably just be grounding the positive side of the button momentarily. I'm pretty sure I did that with a ducted heater remote once, if it's 3.3 you can just attach it to a pin from your board, then send the pin low to press. 5v you might want a level shifter in between. Have you used esphome before/do you have home assistant? Then you can automate the press to a motion sensor or widget on your phone.
Yes, and I'm tinkering all the time. I'd get in with my multimeter and check the voltage first anyways.
At first I read "heat pump" as "heart pump" and I thought "what is this crazy fucker doing?"

🔊Hyper-Spoiler.mp3

Well, you shouldn't keep a gun next to it, unless you want the printer to take ahold of it and rob you.
Why On Earth would you keep a gun NEXT to it!? That's just asking for problems. That printer knows if it gets a hold of that gun, it'll look like a suicide, not a murder.
"no smart home crap" Yeah... That's just a choice. I have two homegrown smarthome solutions that are amazing and complex without creating security holes.
You can tell it’s an IT guy’s home assistant if there’s no hardware that requires someone else’s cloud.
My home automation philosophy is that everything in the house should work with or without internet. It’s going well so far.
I'll add that things should also fail gracefully. If something breaks, they should all revert back to working like the dumb equivalent. Dumb switches, dumb thermostat, etc.
For sure. That one is a bit harder to get right, but is good to keep testing and striving for.
My home assistant is set up that way. If I turn it all off, the house is a little less awesome, but everythiing works fine. You just have to turn on/off lights and open/close doors yourself now. you'll have to diddle with the thermostat and ceiling fans more too.
This is the Way.
And an electronics guy's smart home if there is no wireless at all and all KNX and Ethernet wired lol.
Good recommendation for light bulbs?
Don't do the lightbulbs (unless you rent). Do the power to the sockets.
Smart lightbulbs are a fucking rort
One benefit of smart lightbulbs is being able to control the colour temperature
Which is great if you do that on the reg
There’s a great automation integration in home assistant that uses the suns position and time of day to automagically set the color temp throughout the day. It’s super nice to have the color temp get warmer as the sun sets.
I use that feature every day and in multiple rooms.
Like the other user mentioned: depends on your setup.
I have recessed lighting throughout my house, so swapping to bulbs for all of them would have been an expensive pain. So I opted for smart switches. I got innovelli reds, because they were the best there was at the time. You can get them with any protocol you want (zigbee/zwave/wifi)
With a smart switch, you can control lots of lights with only one device. Originally I just added Shelly relays behind each switch, but I wanted the dimming capability of the innoveli.
If you do still want bulbs, nothing beats hue. But they are by far the most expensive.
As an alternative, we have found bulbs that can run tasmota with the MQTT integration to be perhaps the most reliable part of our smart home (as long as the hardware already had a descent CRI). I've heard good things about ESP home too, but we have not tried it.
If someone has some light bulbs that are laggy (due to cloud integrations) or a pain to use due to software, its worth checking out of tasmota or esp home can be installed on them to locally pair with something like home assistant. It turned a regretful purchase into a nice addition.
With that said, we don't buy connected devices any longer without checking internet and cloud requirements first.
Tasmota is awesome. I flashed all my early Shelly devices with it. But now the native Shelly firmware is amazing, and it allows you to turn on local mqtt only. So I’ve stopped using Tasmota for everything besides the few devices flashed early and behind my wall switches. (I’m too lazy to pull them out)
Is it hard to flash bulbs with Tasmota? Don’t you usually need access to the pins? Or have an OTA option for updating the firmware?
The ones I had you could do it over the air, but some do require access to the pins. Even with soldering experience it is not approachable as bulbs are not packaged to be opened, it is part of why I check for offline or flash compatibility before buying as even the same "model" could have different hardware revisions. No info = avoid.
I love my lutron Caseta gear. Integrates with home assistant and reverts to dumb. Expensive ass dimmer though, and they run on a proprietary hub.
Zigbee bulbs, third reality and sengeled (sp?) are most of what I have attached to my home assistant. Stay away from the WiFi shit tho
It depends on the rest of your setup, but I recommend going with zigbee or matter/thread for the connectivity. I definitely wouldn't put any "smart" devices on my general purpose wifi. That stuff is never going to be secure. Also, consider if smart switches would work for you instead. That way you don't have to pay the premium when a bulb burns out.
Yeah I'm stuck between those two options however it's for much later down the road in my case. House needs a renovation but finances don't allow just yet.
I have a mix of TP Link wifi globes, IKEA ZigBee and Hue Zigbee throughout the house. Zigbee are controlled by a SLZB 06 and ZHA / MQTT. By far the Hue are the best I've tested and have been in service for around 10 years.
do not
This is why I'm conflicted about getting online weather information.
Pretty hard to replace weather info without internet. I don’t have any automations that rely on weather info, and I have a cheap rain gauge that a friend 3d printed for me. It uses a simple zigbee door sensor to detect rain accumulation. Pretty clever device (not my invention.)
So eventually I want to automate the watering of my garden, and I intend to use the rain sensor to help there. But honestly, it never rains in the summer here in the PNW, so my 3rd reality moisture sensors are more useful than actual weather data.
Pretty hard to replace weather info without internet.
Hard to tell the weather without the "Cloud."
Home Assistant and local, cloud-free protocols and devices are great
Boom. Exactly. Self hosted solutions are amazing. We have choices about this stuff.
I have an apartment and it is dumb
Tech here. Lots of smart home crap. All zigbee on Home Assistant
For real! HA* & Zigbee or I seriously doubt the credibility of any „I work in IT“-claim.
*one of OSS contenders is fine.
So pissed ikea moved to matter. They were a great source of cheapie sensors.
IKEA is not bad but I actually prefer (whitelabel) Tuya as long as those run on AA(A).
They might even be cheaper outside the US right now. Ironically thanks to their tariffs.
I've got a few of the zigbee temp/ humidity sensors, definitely better than the ikea variant. And the ikea sockets are stupidly sized and completely cockblock a standard gpo, hate that.
Still hunting a decent AQI, will probably have to get off my arse and build one
I'm using Matter with HA, works just fine. For cheap sensors you can look at Frient or Shelly.
Its not a question of compatability, matter has some inherent security flaws i'm not trucking with
when was the last update :p
Last night.
Why?
Zwave is also great, but typically more expensive.
Harder to get too, sadly.
The fact these companies can release a $200 router or a $1000 smartphone and completely stop all security updates after only a few years is insane.
It should be regulated similar to how cars are regulated - with mandatory service and spare parts for many years.
Cars aren't exactly a good example on how to curb enshittification, as the car industry pioneered enshittification and found a way around regulations every time so far.
While that might be so, I can still buy original spare parts for my 25 years old car and I could still service it at official repair shop if I wanted to.
The "official repair shop" isn't the issue.
It would be third party repair shops. And amazingly you can.
Right to repair has done some good in this world
Sure, I can also drive it to any repair shop where they can buy repair parts and replace them or do whatever it takes to repair it. I can even replace the light bulbs myself, though thus part is not trivial :S
Yeah but, at least in my country, cars can't be on the road (which would be the internet in this case), without passing the periodic inspection.
They have not found a way around it every time.
They all have seat belts
They all have ODB2 ports
Exactly why WAPs, Switches, Firewalls, and Modems should all be separate devices
There's also a big company called Ubiquiti that sells overly expensive trash.
Their switches don't even mirror more than a single port.
I always loved the saying, "The 'S' in IoT stands for security."
As plenty people already said here, I don't see any problems if it's staying in your local network, selfhosted
Perhaps not the best example but one to start joggin' the noggin: it can be a weak point to start an attack your local network, if someone is adjacent (like standing in range of your WiFi). Obviously not a likely scenario to most people reading, especially since HTTPS became normalised, but a reason to keep security in the discussion for local home networks.
That's why you put those devices in a separate VLAN with no routing access to the rest of your network
The more you understand tech, the more you trust the simplest version of it 😅
I just don't understand the desire to control everything in your house with an app. It's not like that app can load or unload the dishwasher or clothes dryer. That would be automation I could really get behind. And thermostats are programmable and then left to themselves. Even ice makers are automatically controlled with a microswitch.
And yes, I did try the internet enabled thermostat thing and found I never used the app. Nor is the journey to the thermostat so arduous that I can't get up and walk over to it if I should ever feel the need. Maybe I'm just too old to get it.
But if you like it and want it then have at it. I certainly won't stop you from enjoying it.
If you don't understand the desire then you don't have a use case. And that's ok. But that doesn't mean other people don't have a use case.
Properly set up home automation can reduce your energy usage. Track temperature throughout your house and open blinds, only direct heat/cooling to rooms that need it, etc. Sure a thermostat is programmable but it's limited by the ability to just turn on/off heat and a few temperature sensors. You can drastically expand what your thermostat can do (ie motorized blinds) and information it has access to (temperature outside, current weather, etc).
Or maybe someone is the type to have panic attacks about forgetting to turn the oven off. Having the ability to see oven status on the go is nice.
Or maybe someone has a larger house than you and the journey to the thermostat is more arduous than yours. Or the journey to the dishwasher or clothes dryer to see if it's done is arduous.
Or maybe someone has a disability and having quick access to various things is a huge time saver.
Maybe someone has a sensory issue and loud buzzing from a dryer finishing is problematic, so they want to disable the "finished" alert from the device and just receive a notification on their phone.
but if youre gathering that much data and making decisions with it, then from the OP "no internet connected thermostats" is a must. None of your smart home stuff should be able to phone home. Basically the openWRT argument but also for smart home. Use zigbee or zwave so devices can't just directly phone home and must simply connect through a hub (that you should control).
tl;dr - plenty of reasons to want these things, they just may not apply to you.
Getting back from holiday in a few hours and the weather is cold? Turn the heating on from your app before you get back. Wow. Life changing. Don't have a use case for most things being connected but thermostat really isn't that crazy IMO.
"Set and forget" time based thermostat programming only works if your daily routine doesn't change daily or weekly or have outliers. The ability to change manually, or add other factors (is anyone home? let it get a bit colder, since it doesn't matter) is pretty great.
But I would still advocate for no internet connected thermostats from the OP. Your thermostat should be isolated to your home network (via zigbee/zwave or a quality VLAN) connecting to a server/hub you control. And your app should be communicating to your server/hub. Your thermostat shouldn't be able to report back to google whether or not you are home.
Door locks and garage door openers are sweet to automate. My instance knows if I left by car/bike/foot, and welcomes me home with the proper unlocking/opening.
Also, never having to worry about if I left the door unlocked or garage door open is nice.
I've never gotten any automated locks because I've always been concerned about security around them, but also, Ive had too many warped doors in my life where I have to lean on the door to get the deadbolt to properly set. Which means that there is no way an automated lock would be able to automatically set itself.
Is the answer here: "there are just some doors this won't work on" or do the smart locks have some way of working around that?
I think you gotta fix the door before you can have complete confidence.
My automated deadbolt can ‘force’ its way shut when it has full battery. But when it gets low on juice, the door needs to be ‘fully shut’
So your best bet is to better align your strike plate so the door doesn’t need shimmied to close fully.
I work every 3rd day, so for an odd schedule it's nice. I set up Home Assistant to look at my calendar.
HomeAssistant and vlans are kind of the answer to most of the issues/concerns regarding smart devices this post has
I have to say though, I find anyone who leans too far either way to be extremely silly
Well chosen devices from reputable manufacturers can drastically improve quality of life
One big one for me was window blinds on a sun timer. Because after a decade, I was swapping from nights to days permanently having spent that past time swapping from nights to days every Wednesday and had signifcant issues both waking up and staying up on those days, and even now I still do
Having my bedroom windows open in the morning on their own to use natural lighting to wake me up has been extremely helpful for that, and then using HA that could be tied into external camera systems to close the windows automatically if a person or vehicle is detected within specific parameters, or having the ability to open my son's window if I hear him crying to be picked up from a nap but I can't immediately respond has been wonderful
Now there's also your Rings, your creepvacuumbots, any smart TV at all and any other host of problems with iot devices, but there are some gems that make life much better without the dark patterns we increasingly associate with connectes devices these days
A lot of the "automation" we can buy is a joke: it should be unobtrusive and provide actual quality of life improvement and it's not. Turning on a light shouldn't require us to interact with an app on our phones.
HA with some good hardware choices does that if you don't mind putting in the work up front. Most of my automations require no interaction to work: they passively check conditions and trigger automatically -- if I'm home, leaving, need to wake up for work, etc.
My phone has a built-in calendar and is about the only "extra" I use it for. It works flawlessly, and I have no other need for any other electronic calendering system. I do admit to using a wall calendar for certain things too. Old habits as a farmer are hard to break. Ye Gods, how I miss the weekly flip calendars I used to get from Cenex every year.....
I just don’t understand the desire to control everything in your house with an app.
Shrinking the size of my wallet and getting rid of all my keys has an instant appeal. I'd much rather just carry around a single phone-sized multipass than a janitor's worth of hardware for accessing a dozen different gates and appliances.
I also got rid of a bunch of keys, and I didn't need an app to do so. if I have to use an app, I'd hate it
You still need an interface. Bunch of ways to do it.
Did you notice your electronic locks all have keys for when they fail? For me, I only need one key for my door lock so it adds nothing noticeable in my pocket. And in all my life I have never seen any home appliance that needed a key to operate-- excepting something like you would see in a laundromat. But you likely don't have the keys for that either.
As for gates, I've owned a lot of gates to control livestock. None of which needed a padlock. But that is very much a YMMV thing. Still, if you have a need for locked gates, a set of combination locks all set to the same combination or keyed locks with all setup for a single key once again minimizes the need for a bunch of bulky keys. Plus they are all cheaper to install and operate. You can literally operate an infinite number locks with just one key or combination.
Did you notice your electronic locks all have keys for when they fail?
No, because I don't have them. I have a fake rock with a key in it and generally don't bother locking my front door anyway. But I'm lazy and cheap, not terribly interested in changing out all my locks myself or paying someone else to do it for a marginal quality of life improvement.
Still, if you have a need for locked gates, a set of combination locks all set to the same combination or keyed locks with all setup for a single key once again minimizes the need for a bunch of bulky keys.
Sure. And if you're setting up a security perimeter from first principles, that's fine. But then you add an interior gate or you need to replace a lock that's rusted through or yadda yadda life happens, and you can lose the single key design.
Case in point, my front door lock did foul a few years ago. My wife changed out the front door but didn't bother to sync it with the back door. She didn't want to bother with an electronic lock because she thought they were too expensive. So now we've got a front door that doesn't match the side door or the garage door. And we only have two keys to the new lock, one of which has been lost almost immediately.
A digital system that I can just sync from my phone would be far more appealing than juggling keys. Or staring at a key dish and trying to remember which ones actually link to which doors.
You can just get another re-keyable lock for any added later locks or replacement lock sets. It's not rocket surgery and one of the reasons why you use re-keyable locks. And if you lost a key, just have a new key made. It's cheap and quick. So you are still only needing one key per user. My key ring has a remote for my car, a post officebox key, (they do not deliver my mail to my house), and one door key to the house that has 3 locking doors. The car remote is by far the most annoying thing in my pocket.
Look, we all want to be part of some cool kids club. I want a new 3D printer because despite my trusty old bed-slingers working flawlessly, I would like a shiny new enclosed Core xy printer so I can be as cool as everyone else with a printer. And if I'm not careful, I can have the same problem with shiny new pocket knives at times. Same thing with digital homes. It's driven by the cool factor rather than any real necessity. So go ahead and connect everything you want. But at least admit to yourself that probably half the reason you do it is just to be a cool kid.
You can just get another re-keyable lock for any added later locks or replacement lock sets.
All things that are a pain in the ass.
So is replacing an electronic door lock and a hell of a lot costlier.
Yeah, i think its all about use cases.
I use home assistant in a tablet on the kitchen wall, for light control, ev charging and battery level monitoring for mine and my wife's car which is not intuitive or easy in the official app. I use it for our shared calendar. Amd weather updates as well as for monitoring my 3d printer and cctv cameras. I host everything locally. Nothing is in the cloud except for the API i need to monitor the EVs and the weather server. I keep finding new things to use it for. I dont do much automation with it. But i find it very useful overall.
Personally, the vast majority of my smart home stuff is light automation. It's nice having a selection of lights automatically turn on half an hour before sunset, and it's nice having a button next to my bed that either turns on the reading lamps, or turns off all the lights in the house depending on how long I press it.
Though in fairness, I am drifting back towards having my lights controlled by buttons, because voice control is mostly bollocks. But now the lights font have to be the ones wired in to the house. It can be any that I can add to Home Assistant.
Having kids makes a big difference. It's very useful to be able to shut off all the lights in the common areas and turn off the lights in their bedroom when they fall asleep. It's also nice to be able to push a button to start a song on the speaker for musical routines (like cleaning up breakfast to Blue Danube or running to bed to Night Comes from Pikmin).
We also have a TON of lamps, and their switches are not always easily accessible (especially because our house is a perpetual mess).
The smart lock is because my wife always used to ask me if I locked the door after I got into bed, and I never remembered because ADHD.
Nor is the journey to the thermostat so arduous that I can’t get up and walk over to it if I should ever feel the need. Maybe I’m just too old to get it.
I live in a three story house, and sometimes only notice when what the thermostat is set to when I'm tired and ready for bed. Climbing a flight of stairs after going down and changing the thermostat doesn't appeal much. I also got it on sale, which was nice.
That's why you have a programmable thermostat. Set and forget. No need to climb stairs, (good exercise), to change the temp.
LOL. That's not a bad approach. What I find happens in practice is that we turn it off during season transitions so we can open the windows, and then forget or need to turn it back on again to deal with the fluctuations in the weather. The temps here have shifted as much as 50 degrees in a single day. Hard to program for that in advance. :)
I live in northern Minnesota, so we get that a lot too in the spring and fall. But my thermostat is set to auto with a minimum temp of 68F to turn on the heat. And 74F to run the air conditioner when needed. It works with very, very little intervention from me year round.
Yeah, that's a good option. However those temps swings also mean that it's likely to get back down (or up) again the next day, and in the mean time I'm potentially running the thermostat.
I've also got an old brick house, which means that thermal mass is a thing in a way that's hard to explain to people who live in modern buildings, but the easiest way to understand it is to realize the house walls are a lot slower at changing temps than the air, which will also mess with the thermometer.
I also didn't get Internet connected thermostats until the utility company added demand response discounts. It's really a smart grid technology. This does mean that it should be secured as such, otherwise it's another vector to attack the power grid (set all thermostats to maximum and cause blackouts). Regulations haven't caught up.
I have some lights and speakers, that's it. I like some automation things like speakers get set to X volume at 7pm, you can say "goodnight" and it has a list of items it does, asks for alarm, turns off all Lights, set speaker volumes lower, sets music in the living room for the doggo.
I have my network locked down and and IoT ssid. I like a few of the conveniences and I watch my network and traffic like a hawk.
Home Assistant is a free and open source alternative for home automation. Don't have to completely give up the future.
This isn't humor, and most tech people have some of this shit. 3/10.
Ive been gifted a few IoT things over the years. They stay on their own network / VLAN or are unplugged entierly when not in use. The meme about keeping the firearm near the one thing I cant reasonably make myself is not innacurate. Tech workers are aware of the vulnerabilities and issues with cheap insecure IoT nonsense. As part of one of my nerds cyber security learning we hacked a smart cat feeder to snoop on wireless networks and allow a back door (we had their permission, it was a gift that was unneeded so they let us take it apart).
Edit: also a ton of that junk phones back to AWS, and usually pretty lazilly, if your learning pen testing or cyber security its a fun exercise to get this cheap crap and find out how it works.
Cool but you're not even close to 'most tech people'.
Guys, gals, non binary pals; I can't emphasize this enough. The average tech worker Isn't some Linux guru working for a VC sending pics of their thigh highs. It's a middle aged millennial with kids who just wants his shit to work.
i've worked with highly competent programmes and sysadmins whose houses are entirely connected. they do exist.
I work in IT, been a software developer for decades.
I have a full on smart home, all the smart tech you can imagine. All connected and running locally via home assistant.
Smart tech isn't bad, shitty tech is.
"Why are you sitting in the dark?"
"AWS is down 😞"
Same for me. I don't really like to expose my home and I don't understand how people are so eager to plug in shady WiFi stuff into their network. I've got one "smart" device with WiFi connectivity I've allowed to connect to my network, but I've disallowed going online and I've put it into a different vlan.
Friend of mine: "let's set up a camera in our bedroom to check on on the dog when we're away."
The one thing I will never use a smart device for is my door lock. I don't understand how tech literate people really trust that.
I was considering a smart lock for my (armored) front door, but just because there are some locks manufactured here in Italy that can be set to be controlled by external contacts.
Which means I could use and ESP or similar with esphome, now they also support wired, ethernet ones.
That's way more secure than the shitty lock I have now, I've seen videos of people picking that with a decoder device in 30 seconds.
Locks are not secure anyway and even if it is the most secure lock ever built may I present a window. Most break ins at least when I did home alarms where smash window right beside door and unlock it.
True as well, but a broken window or a lockpick my neighbors might be interested in.
Again, my door is armored and I live in an apartment high up enough that climbing, while possible, is challenging.
Together with non-flashy vehicles and the complete absence of anything valuable (besides RAM!), we're not an interesting target. Even if someone broke in they'd have to be an electronics enthusiast to find anything worth stealing.
I have a couple WiFi devices for smart home like some TVs and thermostat. All blocked from WAN access and used for local control.
I’m gonna guess that you put a decent amount of time into figuring out a good set of smart home products and maybe even put some effort into looking up which products play well together and what configurations are ideal.
And that’s great if you enjoy shopping for, setting up and maintaining all those toys. But we all know there is too much shitty tech out there to think that it’s a good idea to grab a bunch of smart home stuff at Best Buy one afternoon and just plug it all in and call it good.
I think the thing is, folks in tech are less likely to be cool with, for example, exposing their door locks on the internet without doing a decent amount of due diligence. You have to want it enough to put in the work to make sure you have something that you can feel is secure, smooth operating and meets your personal privacy expectations. It kinda has to be a minor hobby. Which is cool if you happen to enjoy it or get enough joy from the result to make it worthwhile.
For me, I have enough hobbies and pastimes. I’ll put in the effort when the payoff is high, like for a home media server. But there’s no way in hell I’m signing up for future chores and headaches just so I can control my window curtains from my phone.
Nope ZigBee or zwave cool. Not that hard. Next work offline with home assistant OK.
Ditto. A smart home that can operate even if the Internet is offline was one of my core goals setting this up. And save for a few exceptions, I accomplished it. It's so jarring now to go on vacation and not have all this automation.
This is exactly the line of thought I think people aren't seeing as the gap. Y'all are too comfortable expecting the internet to be on 24/7. Or the power, for that matter.
If Cloudflare shits the bed again, are your lights stuck on or off? Can you not turn up the heat? We're in a period of history where things will bet worse, not better. The last thing I want is "error: can't connect to internet" being why you can't turn the things you can touch in your house on and off. I get it if you've managed to do the work to have it all locally hosted, but just as-is seems like a bet against one's self.
When the power is off chances are that whatever is integrated is degraded anyway. And for actuators just choose some that fail gracefully and allow manual handling. For the rest use HA as much as possible, favour local integrations with no cloud dependencies… and when there are dependencies than make sure the override is available physically (looking at my vaillant HP). Then stack UPSes or even better home grade batteries (my next endeavour) and have backup connectivity to internet and you’re a peachy as can be.
The key thing is you have exclusive root access to all of it and spend time on admin.
as a hardware iot security person, that is possible but too much attack surface to manage
ZigBee, Z-wave and Thread have virtually 0 attack surface from an IoT perspective, and even then what are they gonna do, do radio hacking to turn off and on my lights? It's not like they can be used in a botnet.
Locks is a bit more risky as an endeavor, but again, it's probably easier to pick the lock than hack it... Actually with the quality of many smart locks, smashing them is easier still.
Smart TVs are way more problematic devices for example, as soon as they stop receiving updates, you have a bunch of high-speed internet connected devices with unresolved exploits just sitting there waiting for the right chance.
Hear hear.
I feel the meme in the post is created by someone pseudoilliterate in technology. But I can guaranty you they have a smart TV connected to the same WiFi as all their computers and maybe a nas or home server.
Setting up zwave or ZigBee networks is not an attack vector.
ive used smart light bulbs in a botnet before. and if you do a teardown on one of those locks you can probably get the firmware and uart to get the unlock function which you could use theoretically to unlock every single one
ive used smart light bulbs in a botnet before
Yeah that's why I never mentioned WiFi ones. Which can still be secured by not letting them access the rest of the network or the internet. That's what we do in industrial automation, security standards for PLC software tend to suck, but that's irrelevant if it can't be reached.
and if you do a teardown on one of those locks you can probably get the firmware and uart to get the unlock function which you could use theoretically to unlock every single one
I don't see how that's relevant for a lock that's inside an armoured door, it's only accessible by disassembling the door, at which point unlocking it is moot.
Following computer security stuff makes every smart thing suspicious
As they should be.
none of the "smart" devices are actually smart. in my experience they're really fucking dumb
i once bought a "smart" electric kettle because i thought it'd be nice to boil my water to exact temperatures for my teas. it had a little button on a little screen to turn it on
and of course the screen stopped working, and that was the singular thing that broke. if the kettle had a physical switch i'd have only lost the ability to boil to exact temperatures instead of becoming fully useless
a similar thing happened with my Quest VR. a singular smart thing broke (the proximity sensor) and it bricked the whole thing (the proximity sensor deteced, well, proximity, and input from that decided if the screen inside was turned on. when it broke, the screen never turned on. the proximity sensor could be disabled - but only from within the settings menu that required the screen to be on in the first place. there was no other way to disable it, and that setting reset every full shut down)
never had that happen with my non smart devices, never had a non-critical feature failing bricked my "dumb" machine. oh the proper graphics card melted in my laptop? whatever i just disabled it, it might not perform as it used to but it's still functional and perfect for just browsing the internet or watching youtube
my dumb printer never just stopped for no reason, my dumb kettle with a physical toggle has been working perfectly for 3 years now, my dumb light bulbs only stop working when they've reached the end of their ability to make light, my dumb devices never refuse to work even when what they can do isn't perfect anymore
i was already annoyed by so many devices being labelled as "smart" when they're not, and now they're also adding "AI" to those things... i hate it here
This is me, nothing in my house needs automation for any reason. There is especially no need for internet connectivity. The closest to automation I have ever had is the timers that turn the lights on or off on my fishtanks.
I hacked this guy's fish tanks, I reprogrammed the lights and I'm currently training his fish through EMDR to memorize all his passwords. In about six months time I'll break into his house, interrogate his fish and clean out all his bank accounts.
bypassing a water-gapped security system
Sure, it's a phishing attack
The fish have already emptied my accounts, you are going to be disappointed.
Why don't you just get a realistic water pistol, paint it black and interrogate him directly? Put a chunk of depleted uranium in the end of the barrel so you can pistol whip him and it will be realistic and he will shit pants, which you can turn into dirt in the crafting screen.
Dude's never heard of fishing attacks.
If you know a way to hack a mechanical timer I'd love to hear it.
I used to work the IT help desk as well and I didn’t want to fix broken shit in my spare time either. Friends and family were constantly on me to fix their shit or worse, help them setup their new thing / upgrade or whatever. The thing that always irritated me about it was that no one ever considered this a favor, you know, actual labor. To them, I just knew the secrets, and should simply share those secrets with them like a good friend. Because whatever they wanted to do, in their minds, was very very bad easy, they were just missing some small secret answer that would make it all suddenly work. And of course they’d only consult me late in the game after they’d made the purchase or whatever and gotten stuck because it didn’t work. Eventually I had to formally declare that I wouldn’t be helping anyone anymore.
My trick with family is I tell them "Well, I can do it, try harder." It's my little way to show them how much I appreciate how often they told me I was mentally handicapped growing up.
I just started writing up invoices for my side hustle and quoting prices to fix their shit.
I do that for a day job, so I have no interest in working more for free. Putting a price tag on the help definitely helped cut down how much bullshit they tried to get me to do
If it’s a very well defined task with repeatable steps, sure. Often it’s more like “why won’t my CarPlay open my garage door?” And in those cases I barely even know where to start and need to experiment and fiddle, and the last thing I want is them hanging on my arm asking questions and offering bad theories.
The only people I do this stuff for is my parents, because they certainly did a lot for me over the decades. Also, if I don't do these things for them, some asshole will drain their bank accounts because their passwords would be the names of their children.
Having worked in IT for 17 years. I don't trust any MFer that uses their IT experience as a reason to do something.
I will trust people using their IT experience as a reason to avoid something, though
Not all of us will do it to the same degree though. IT security has always been a sliding scale between security and convenience. The most secure data is stored in a locked safe without being turned on or connected to anything. That's not very practical, so we make concessions based on how often we need such data and other convenience metrics.
I'm not as paranoid as the OP, though I agree with some of the stuff said. Reasonable security measures are fine; you don't need to look like a digital version of a prepper with a bunker, for most people.
Edit: for instance I don't use my TV all that much, but it is a "smart" TV, meaning it has apps that connect to Internet, and I have some online libraries.
It seems like half of the people claiming they work in this field actually struggle more than the average person
Exactly.
My first personal e-mail way back in the 90s was with my ISP. Then I changed ISPs and saw the problem with that. So I moved to Yahoo.
Some years later, in the 00s I just decided to get my own, paid for, Internet domain and have my e-mail there, even though I could've carried on using Yahoo or get Google Mail (very popular amongst techies back then) for free. The main reason was that I realized I must made sure the e-mail address was MINE, not actually owned by somebody else with me allowed to use it under their conditions.
Twenty years later and guess it was pretty wise to not have my e-mail in the claws of "Definitelly Do Evil" Google.
Experience using and living with Tech, mainly once your understanding of it reaches the level of understanding systemic elements, naturally informs ones choices in Tech, and that often means chosing something else than the mass marketed "popular" stuff that's designed to lock you in, sell you stuff or sell your attention to others and eavesdrop on you and sell your data.
Another perspective. You got lucky that the dependencies you're working with haven't gotten as bad as the ones for Gmail and the like. Sure you've got a domain, but you've also got a domain registrar you're dependent on. Yeah, you've got your own email server, but it's dependent on open source software, and the monopolists allowing it to still connection, though that's getting iffy. You're also dependent on the kindness of a number of people continuing to contribute to Linux, and it not being compromised in some way.
I made a different choice 25 years ago, and went with Gmail, but the idea that you're smarter because your dependencies didn't turn to sh*t is as much luck as skill. 25 years is several eternities in tech, and there are no guaranteed outcomes.
If you have your own domain, you aren't stuck with your dependencies. Swapping registrars is a straight forward porting procedure. Swapping hosting is a matter of replacing 5 or so DNS entries. It took me about 20 minutes to reconfigure my domain's email when I decided I didn't want to use Proton anymore.
It's not a given. Some registars can be total dicks about transfers and drag it until expiry, after which they would kindly offer their services of "negotiating a buyout from the owner" (i.e. themselves), asking $100 upfront just for them say some absurdly high price and then hold it on park for a whole year just out of spite if you ever initiated the process.
And you knew 25 years ago that the market wouldn't consolidate down to 1-2 registrars?
I suppose you can't know that, but your odds on betting on a whole industry are better than a single company. Not to mention, the barrier to entry for a registrar becoming accredited really isn't that high, so I wouldn't expect market consolidation unless ICANN changes the process, at which point shit is fucked regardless.
True, I'd be more concerned about legislation to be honest. The CAN-SPAM act is just the mildest example.
Also with the computer industry it's getting pretty rare for any market niche to have more than 1-2 dominant players in it. Generally it's winner take all. Just see what happened with all the indie ISPs.
I think there’s a wider point here, open source is the good long term bet
Has been so far, but I don't feel that was obvious 25 years ago.
Literally the worst that can happen to me if I'm really really unlucky is end up tied down to a single provider, same as you.
There were already 100s of registars back then (and as of 2024 there were over 2000) along with a standardized process for moving a domain to another registar, all regulated by an international regulator, ICANN.
Given that ease of migration is guaranteed by ICANN, making the market highly competitive, the only real risk that this entire system end up "consolidated" is if ICANN is totally subverted, a pretty tall order considering it's in the interest of every single country in the World and millions of businesses (who also have domain names) that it is not, so that's highly unlikely.
Meanwhile Google is just one and has always been just one. From the very start there was NEVER any perspective of there being more than one provider of gmail addresses so there was NEVER any perspective of being able to move away from Google and still keep your e-mail address if Google screwed you in some way. As for all your e-mails, those were always freely accessible to Google and they could always do whatever they want with that data.
In simple terms, you chose to be Google's bitch and hope that they don't screw you over too badly, whilst I, maybe, if I'm really really unlucky and an entire international system for domain name regulation is subverted against the interests of all countries in the World and most businesses, might one day at worst end up in the same situation as you.
I'm afraid your face-saving risk "analysis" on this is hilariously bad.
Literally the worst that can happen to me if I’m really really unlucky is end up tied down to a single provider, same as you.
No, there are a lot more risks you're running that I am not. Since you control your infrastructure, you're also responsible for it. Current penalty under CAN-SPAM act is up to $53,088 per email. So, no the worst thing that can happen to you if you're really unlucky is to die penniless after being sued into oblivious for operating a spam operation.
Before the worst happens, it's getting increasingly more likely that your domain will end up in a blacklist at Gmail, Yahoo, or Outlook, for which there is no formal appeal process. All that would require would somebody hacking your domain, and sending spam, or just sharing an ip address with a spammer.
That's before we get into the things that you're already lost: time and effort maintaining the system, which I have not.
Anyway, I was just being polite, but since you're incapable of doing so, and need to resort to ad homenium attacks, I think we're done here.
You're assuming I'm using my domain to send spam or am operating the e-mail server myself. That's a pretty wild assumption.
Further, I don't live in the US nor do I have assets in the US, so that act means shit for me.
You can pay a company that hosts e-mail to do it for you, and pretty cheap too.
Which I do.
Like the registar, one can change that provider too, and if do that I get to take the e-mail address with me as well as all my e-mails (all data is fully exportable), unlike with Google were the e-mail address is theirs, not yours.
Try again.
Pretty much anyone who speaks of "tech" tends to have no idea of that they are talking about. Same applies to people using "cyber" as if it was a real word outside of Science Fiction, and a very niche niche branch of engineering that doesn't necessarily deal with computers.
I don't think it just about tech and cyber, "medical/military grade" is very close on how it's used and how little people understand what they actually mean.. A person working close to a military would avoid many "military grade" products and so on.
A person working close to a military would avoid many “military grade” products and so on.
It's as with anything manufactured for a public institution. It won a bid by being the cheapest (and/or bribing an official). Once you know that, you'll look at the world with different eyes.
Grade refers to the minimum specifications tho, they don't even describe the whole product
To add on to your comment, and I've said this before, but specifically for military equipment, the terminology is military spec/milspec. The stuff labeled "military grade" is 100% bs.
Military spec can mean a ton of different things depending on the equipment. For example, for electronics it often means being in a blast, water and dust proof enclosure, and capable of withstanding rather impressive amounts of outside interference and temperatures.
This argument about lowest bidders everyone keeps coming back to is true, but the end product will still be of considerably higher quality than what you're going to get as a normal consumer.
Because this equipment is often under tight import/export restrictions, getting your hands on it isn't easy. Older gear can be bought at surplus stores, and maybe some things are easier to get in the US, but in general the good stuff won't be for sale until it no longer hold value to the military that bought it.
/rant
Mechanical Windows
As opposed to what, wireless windows?
Microsoft Windows
Is this a thing fat americans use or whatever the stereotype is meant to be here?
I've only heard of that in DIY context: I remember someone making one of these to be as dumb as possible by just making it toggle positions on a wake-on-lan packet and just be off otherwise.
How about bio-windows?
As a general rule, if you buy "smart" anything where it requires an internet connection and a cloud service to function it will be bitrotten within 5 years and dead within 10. And that's assuming the company survives so long and is bothered to support it. That's from planned obsolescence and the ongoing cost of supporting the platform when they have something new to sell. And while things can benefit from an internet connection, if its white goods then run a mile.
I think forward thinking companies could actually gain a lot of free publicity and sales if they openly pledged that their software was in escrow and would automatically release after a period of time and/or as a failsafe if the company discontinued the product and/or they went bust.
it will be bitrotten within 5 years and dead with 10
Worse, it could get bought out and converted to a Meta, Google, or Amazon product.
It should be required that companies either maintain their services perpetual or release the software with a permissive license to allow users to maintain their own service.
Good, solid state tech should last basically forever unless something wild happens.
Yeah. the SPIRIT of this meme is fine, but most of the tech I use I've BEEN happily using for almost 15 years. Good design and custom software without internet access run FOREVER.
The dev I know who’s most into home automation using cloud services has also fallen the hardest for “AI will build all systems and nothing will go wrong with that”. Honestly, I should become a cyber criminal in this climate.
Technology under capitalism becomes a hazard and a threat.
"no smart home crap" except smart home "crap" can be quite secure today... but please go on.
(80% of my smart home "crap" runs firmware I compiled, communicates only with a local server and have no internet access)
I already do that crap all day at work. The last thing I want to do is do it to my coffee maker or something.
That's exactly what I want to do! I saw a post some years ago, someone had connected a ~ESP32 (or the like) to their coffee maker, connected it to the WiFi and made an app to remote controll it.
I want to do something similar. Prepp the coffee in the evening, set a time for the machine to start and then have fresh coffee when I wake up. I realise that I could just do all of this and just press the button when I wake up instead, but the idea of this makes me happy.
If I want coffee in the morning I just fill my French press the night before with cold water.
And they’ve made drip coffee makers with timers for decades. No WiFi needed.
The whole point is to make it because I want to. As I said, I can just prepare my MoccaMaster the day before and the coffee will be one button press away in the morning.
It's a do it once thing, though... ESPHome essentially keeps everything updated and secure.
My house too. I don't work in IT, I just can't afford any of this.
I guess the lock picking lawyer has something to say about those mechanical locks.
Yeah, he'd probably say "at least they aren't smart locks"
And still pick them in 10 seconds.
Without a doubt. He's the lockpicking lawyer, after all.
But a lot of smart locks are basically locks that have all the attack vectors of normal locks, plus a bunch of extra attack vectors due to being 'smart'.
To be fair, that dude makes it look easy. Picking a quality lock you aren't familiar with is pretty tough.
Oh, so are they (IDK the name but dude is locksmith but also throwing knives) pretty elite skill wise in locksmithing space?
I have no point of reference for that but in rock guitar term are they like Stevie Vai, Guthrie Govan level ?
McNally is the axe/knife guy. I can't speak to their reputation in the broader hobby, but these guys are VERY experienced. To me, it seems like a magic trick to open locks in 30 seconds when it might take me 1 minute to 1 hour. Except master lock. It really is that easy.
Yeah, it's hard to judge how much the gap between beginner and them. I remember there's one where LPL doing some seminar, I was like "He's an actual lawyer???" like I can't believe the locksmithing part is just his hobby or something.
Except master lock
"You can open master lock with another master lock"
Same thing for mechanics. My dad has wrenched for 45 years and you should see what he drives lol
Smart TV is the only one I've really managed to avoid. Every TV is smart at this point
Doesn't mean it needs Internet access tho
Doesn't mean it needs Internet access tho
Annoyingly, some models won't let you get through the initial setup menu unless you let it connect.
Smart TV companies hate this one simple trick!
Pack the TV up in the original box and take it back for a full refund. And tell them why.
Every screen is watching you jack off to demon futa porn in this day and age. Well, at least they watch me watch that. They don't eveb need cameras; they can see through the pixels, dude.
I have plenty of iot devices. Like anything that goes online, it’s how you set it up. If you know how to monitor traffic, it’s not terribly hard to get these things to behave how you want them to.
Home assistant!
I work in cyber security and I have lots of smart home things. I also assume my network’s being compromised at all times and keep anything really important on paper in a safe.
When I see an IT person post like this, I instantly think "So, you're the IT person who always finds a reasons to say no." I've manage IT shops for 30+ years, and you're not my kind of IT person.
Also IT here. I've worked with these sorts of guys, also agree not my kind of IT person. Usually craps on anything and everything.
For some reason, I feel like you're the type of person who uses AI to write code.
Edit: lmao, seems that you don't like being called out.
Kind of meta, but does anybody remember garage door openers back in the day? My family had one for which the "security" consisted of an 8-bit "key," as in, the remote had 8 jumpers, and the lift unit had 8 DIP switches. You'd cut jumpers in a certain pattern, and flip the switches to match. What was fun was seeing how many garage doors around town we could open using the default pattern.
Smart locks have got to be at least a slight improvent, right?
Smart locks have got to be at least a slight improvent, right?
Yes.
With a heavy focus on "slight"...
Non-IT people don't find much use in these things either. There's a brief futurism novelty that wears off. The devices sit unused until they inevitably break or go obsolete. Or they give up using out of frustration. Not because they're tech illiterate. Because they realize the thing didn't need to be IOT.
Well I have smart devices and a thermostat. Thermostat is awesome but local control only through home assistant and rest of the house is all zwave and ZigBee no internet required.
I'm with you on this, but i am genuine curious, what kind of advantage does it bring? You still have to unload the dishwasher, you can close the blinds with 1 button when you're at home. My temperature control has a sensors outside to check how much heating i need.
Literally i want examples of where this makes life easier?
Well that's the thing. You design around your needs.
We have leak sensors on the brew fridge downstairs and behind the washing machine so we catch issues before they become floods. Door sensors to assuage anxiety and handle ADHD. Smart sockets so we can turn on things like rope lights in the subfloor with a button we can place anywhere we like rather than groping twelve feet into the spider-filled space to find the GPO. A button where every single function is set to turn the fan on so the hubs can roll over and slap it on his bedside table when he wakes up too hot instead of reaching behind the fan half asleep and fumbling for knobs. A tea button so we don't forget the tea we have steeping. Tank overflow system that overrides the daily timer and pumps to a secondary reservoir system to maximise capture in high rainfall. Stuff like that
The speaker that plays "it's raining men" when his lordship comes home and the garage door sensors that scream "what is WRONG with you people???" If opened at 3am is just me having fun with it though
It's good if you have pets, being able to both keep an eye and control certain parts of the house for their benefit when you're not there.
There's also the first world problem of being too cold in bed but the thermostat is downstairs.
We have motorised shutters, my next plan is to tie in a daylight sensor so we can shut them at night and they open up a bit at dawn so the cats can sun themselves. At the moment we just have them open all the time, i mislike that.
OK here's one why do we assume someone working in tech is knowledgeable in tech. Its a job. I have met many network maintainers for companies who seem like they know nothing. I have met many support staff who don't know their bass from a home in the ground. Just because by outwork in the field does not mean you are an expert on everything or even the thing you do. And this doesn't just apply to tech
Oh no, google / alwxa should be shot in the face, don't mistake that.
And never trust any "smart" appliance that doesn't work without internet access.
Why would the IT help desk need to identify bass and treble?
The post in the screenshot just screams incompetent boomer at me.
No HA*, no Zigbee, no containerized service landscape but the routers run OpenWRT. Hmm, Okay.
*other OSS contenders are fine.
Mechanical locks are so easy to break into with minimal tools. My friend that sells security doors uses digital locks for that reason.
Windows are even easier.
Digital locks that have a network connection are even easier to break into while on the other side of the planet.
No, they are not. There are terrible digital locks as there are terrible mechanical locks. Good digital locks use sound encryption algorithms that makes them incredibly resilient to attacks. You can have digital locks that are not connected to the internet. Makes no sense to hack a physical door you have no access to anyway.
You left your WRT open?
I jest but you should be using OPNsense, OpenWRT is so old and OPNsense has many more features.
I don't even know what IT stands for and I knew all that shit is garbage
I work in IT and I've got most of those things.
But it is largely due to the inconvenience of installation relative to just coasting on existing home infrastructure. I also don't bother with roof solar and home battery backups, a household wide firewall, or anything connected to a raspberry pi. Just implemented Jellyfin over Christmas and my wife regularly throws up her hands at it, preferring Amazon Prime or HBO Max at every opportunity.
For the most part, the cost of an individualized IT component isn't worth the pain of support. If I was looking for an apartment or a condo, I would absolutely be interested in their building wide IT setup. But the whole point of IT is to deliver at scale. Homelabing can be a fun hobby but it's a shit-pay second job.
This made me wonder, are there any mechanical switches that can be switched by a smart something? As in, a regular switch where the user always has mechanical control, even when the smart system is down, but that optionally can be switched by a smart sytem, state reading is optional.
Yes
Most of them. The up and down are buttons behind the normal looking switch. It works manually before pairing to the network.
Shelly also makes a small module that wires in with the existing switch. Up and down lose meaning and just signal to change state.
If my brief research for HA sometimes ago is correct many popular brand have it, at least for electrical switches like lamp, also garage door opener conversion but the few I watched looked like a pain to set up.
I'm using Sonoff switches. They work very well with HA but they also operate independently if it's down. So I always install the behind a physical switch, that way I always have a backup in case something's wrong (and I know it will happen).
A big issue is, IT is a very broad field with many parts extremely niche and disconnected from each other.
It's like saying "work in science" that could mean anything.
I've met more than a few programmers that were above average, but could barely turn on their computer.
I've had many discussions with friends, saying I should work on servers or desktops when my IT experience is in medical databases and interfaces (HL7)...
Same here. Not the working in IT part, though.
People connect their thermostat to the internet?
Yes, so they can change it while they are away from home ... for some reason.
Because it takes time for an air conditioner to cool down the place, and it wastes energy to keep it running for 8 hours while you're at work.
this can easily be solved with a simple timer
Mine has a simple program that adjusts based on a few times per day (overnight, during the day, evening). I don't need to control it from my phone while away from home.
I read It and it wasn't as good as it was on mushrooms seeing It on screen. I mostly enjoyed the habdjob I got in my popgorn bucket from my cousin. She's married now and works with computer, and she tell me I shouldn't download these toolbars, but how else I fibd Spongebob Hentau on demand? AI isn't not good enough yet for my fetishes...
internet thermostat i dont even use mines remote
Some users here: "I haven't had a need for this tech, others should not use it." Caveman grunts
Everything was better before computers