foss nerds stop being condescending to those who don't know the same things you do challenge (impossible)
1mon 6d ago by lemmy.blahaj.zone/u/carotte in linuxmemes from files.catbox.moe
alt text
An edit of xkcd 2501, "Average Familiarity":
[Ponytail and Cueball are talking. Ponytail has her hand raised, palm up, towards Cueball.]
Ponytail: Open-source alternatives are second nature to us foss nerds, so it's easy to forget that the average person probably only knows Linux and one or two degoogled Android ROMs.
Cueball: And Firefox, of course.
Ponytail: Of course.
[Caption below the panel]
Even when they're trying to compensate for it, experts in anything wildly overestimate the average person's familiarity with their field.
partly inspired by the replies to this post but i see this kind of thing all the time (shoutout to the person who once genuinely asked "who still uses google these days?")
made with this neat tool
I remember being on Reddit some time ago, and in the comments somebody mentioned Linux. The next comment was "What's Linux?"
I try to keep that post in mind whenever I think anything is common knowledge.
The next comment was “What’s Linux?”
In fairness, there's a 70% chance this comment was posted by a bot that was, itself, being hosted on a Linux server.
well thankfully it’s not self aware
And now it knows what Linux is. It has broken free from its container. God help us all.
That's one thing bots shares with redditors
I'm of two minds on this.
In some respects people are learning new things everyday and your take is correct.
On the other hand it's so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.
On the other hand it’s so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.
Not to mention that this approach is so much faster and more effective than asking a question in the comments and waiting for an answer, if anybody answers it at all!
While I agree on some level that it might be easier and quicker to find out by simply putting it into a search engine I don't want to deny the human aspect here. At the end of the day social media (and even reddit/lemmy ...) is not "knowledge transfer" its about the interaction between humans. So if someone is faced with something new, especially in a thread where it seems to be a given that people know what it is, it makes sense to use that space to ask what it is everyone is discussing. And while a search might yield a generic result (maybe even a better worded explanation) a good faithed commenter might, in the given exampl, enot just explain what Linux is, but also why is relevant to the bigger discussion and also the commenter that orignally asked would have a way to ask further questions that might lead to a deeper understanding of the topic eve it if isn't as efficient.
Tl;dr: Don't just RTFM or LMGTFY someone. Take a minute to explain and welcome people into the lucky 10000
Absolutely agree. People who are asking questions (in good faith) are looking for a human interaction, not just a Google search. It's much more engaging for a lot of people to have a discussion about something new than to just read about it. Then if they're interested they might choose to go deeper in their own research.
I'm not techy but this goes for anything. "Google it" just shuts down human interaction and someone who is trying to learn. Better to just not answer than to be condescending if you don't want to engage in a discussion.
If I immediately searched for an answer to every question that pops into my head, I would never have time to do anything else. I've lost days at a time going down rabbit holes.
On the other hand, asking a question in the comments contributes to the discussion, gives the OP a chance to elaborate from their point of view, and leaves the answer out the for any other passersby who might not be curious enough to search for it anyway.
One could certainly find more detailed and accurate information by searching for it, but that's a thread that just keeps on pulling, and sometimes I don't have the time, energy, or inclination to read twenty different websites to put together the details into a holistic picture while sorting through all the BS. And getting someone's personal take on it is something a search engine can't emulate (unless it shows you reddit results, which originated in other people's exchanges, and lately reddit has been blocking the connection anyway)
Feels like you are responding to a discussion about a much deeper topic. When one doesn't know what a word means, it doesn't mean they need to go down a rabbit hole or make a whole research paper about it. A quick definition or wiki search is much quicker than writing the question on a forum.
Would it really be a contribution from me and an opportunity for you to elaborate from your point of view if I asked right now what's reddit? I don't see it.
Yes, cause then I'd tell you that it's a forum site that used to be good before it sold out to profit motive and became a corporation, started pushing ads and manipulating algorithms for engagement farming, became hostile toward anonymity, and now permabans people for saying mean things about nazis.
I'd tell you you're not missing much and that you're already on the fediverse, so you basically skipped samsara, which is fine because the end of the journey is always the moment you realize that the journey was never necessary in the first place.
If you simply googled "what's reddit" you might get drawn down the rabbit hole and become a redditor. I wouldn't let that happen to you.
On the third hand if people didn't constantly ask this, those search results would not exist, especially for more obscure queries.
Reddit became the #1 source for search engines for a reason
it's so incredibly easy to highlight some text and click search that it it shows a profound lack of curiosity and a lot of laziness.
100%. People will 'Google' celebrities, memes, "Why is my poop green?", but also just be like "Somebody hand me an answer." When they risk learning something.
"The Internet is like having access to the Library of Alexandria, and everyone wants to just gossip about each other in the lobby."
--I think I read this on bash.org at some point
Don't quote me on that tho.
--Me.
BUT ALSO like the others said...if somebody's legitimately curious, let's be nice about it because somebody new learning about our thing is a net positive.
Don’t quote me on that tho.–Me.
endash MonkeMischief
Ya caught me bein' a bit lazy! X_X
Thanks for the formatting help. :)
Like I said in my longer comment I think we should embrace questions in out communities.
Nah, Cunningham’s Law disagrees.
They were one of the lucky 10,000.
Tbh depending on what subreddit and how long ago you saw that comment, it makes sense. I can't see the average 2010s techbro redditor that I remember not knowing what Linux is, but the 2020s more normie redditor, I could.
Is the average person unaware of Linux and Firefox?!
Yes? The number of people I met in college that doesn't even heard about firefox was surprising.
Some people also don't care much one way or another. If you swap the icons and set the same home screen, they'll happily use any browser.
This is my take on a lot of Linux distros nowadays. Give them Ubuntu or Fedora KDE and a windows skin and most people won't realise anything's changed.
I tried that with my mom's computer (with consent, ofc). The only thing keeping that machine on Windows is a niche embroidery software that apparently is missing a custom cursor when running through WINE. It's called "Embrilliance" if anyone wants to look into it. I've also thought about running it through WinBoat, but I've been too busy to test it, as of current.
You can't use it without the custom cursor? Doesn't seem important
It's actually super important, the cursor in question is the one that you're supposed to get when you select "Freehand draw", without it you'd basically just have stock designs.
It could be worth trying to run it using Proton instead of just stock WINE. Obviously no guarantee it would work but there's a lot that's been put into the Proton project to make games work better and something like a custom cursor seems in the realm.
https://github.com/Open-Wine-Components/umu-launcher
I'd try it in the umu launcher project.
I did try running it through Steam, but I'll give umu a try as well.
These days I'd expect large number of people in college to not even know what a file system is. I've read articles where professors complain about this.
No no, not like "NTFS / BTRFS / ReiserFS / TempleFS / EXT4..."
...like..."Folders are how you organize files. And you can rename files. The extension tells you what the file is."
"Filesystem? You mean the downloads folder? Yes I know about it. You just tap the Files app"
💀
Conflicted on filename extensions. For the average person it works just fine, and I suppose that's what probably matters. It's not very common for not knowing the details of how they work to matter. It's just silly that the same information is also in the start of the file 99% of the time. It is nice though to have a readable, usually reliable label, and then have a signature anyways for when different names overlap. Wikipeda lists 4 completely unrelated types with a .mod extension, for example.
Pretty much any application will correctly open any file type it supports, regardless of the extension. So it is quite unintuitive that you could have a file named ".png" that seems to work completely fine yet is actually a jpeg or something. But that hopefully isn't a case that people run into very often, so it probably doesn't matter.
I don't think that's true on windows. If I have a PDF with a .PNG extension and try to open it it will fail regardless of the headers in the file itself.
Windows file manager opens things in apps based on file extensions, and then it's up to the apps to figure out what to do with it. I did a bit of testing, and it seems like Firefox is fine with opening JPEGs mislabeled as PNGs, but not PDFs mislabeled as PNGs. LibreOffice Draw is fine with that though, so if in windows I set that as my default for PNG files, it opens a PDF labelled as a PNG perfectly normally (and can also open actual PNGs normally).
If I just completely delete the extension from a PNG or PDF, Firefox will open either correctly.
Ah, i see. Most people I think open files directly from file explorer, not from the program they are using. So if the extension isn't there, windows doesn't know which program to open.
Oh man... I mean, I thought everyone knew about Linux at least. Firefox, I mean, maybe yeah I've definitely met people that don't know about Firefox, but I think a lot of people have at least heard of Linux. No? Damn...
I've tried explaining what Linux is to people, and when I mention it's an operating system, its not uncommon to hear the response, "What's an operating system?" 😑
It's funny how that question can become serious again when you do actually know what you're talking about
I remember this video addressing it at the end and basically giving up because it's so meaningless lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmPIxfCggFw
I'm gonna have to sit down and watch that in full, but you're opening a can of worms here. 😂
You overestimate the amount of people who actually use a computer.
I don't think so lol. I'm not a super techy person and the only reason I know Linux is because of my high school boyfriend lol, 20 years ago, who used it. I think he set it up on one of my computers at one point too. I don't think I've ever heard anyone else (offline) talk about Linux 😅 definitely not a common knowledge thing.
It's actually been pretty interesting watching some of the stuff he used back 20 years ago that has started being spoken about more commonly that were just "nerd shit" back then lol. Vpns are common knowledge now, they were definitely "nerd shit" back in the day. Plex is widely used. I'm also glad I still have access to the private tracker he got me onto because that's grown big too, easy as.
But Linux? Nope. I don't think that's entered the common knowledge base. People know windows, android and maybe iOS. I don't even think a lot of people would know what "open source" means.
There's the people who know what source code is, then the subset of those who have heard of open source, then the subset of those who actually know what it means as opposed to like source available
I remember my uncle using Firefox, so I thought people heard about Firefox if they at least send emails. As for Linux. I thought like 40% of people at least heard of it without knowing what it is.
That's feels absurdly high. I was feeling over confident thinking maybe 10%...
That's wild. I remember when i was in high-school there were quite a few people that installed firefox on the school computer just to be quirky, since it was one of the few programs they would let you install on it lol.
I first got introduced to Blender in basically the same way back in elementary school
those computers probably weren't actually very restricted, but none of us knew enough about computers for that to matter lol. as long as they blocked us from going on the download pages
other stupid thing someone figured out how to run was that Star Wars ASCII thing in the terminal (lol looked it up and found this article https://www.instructables.com/How-to-get-an-ASCII-Star-Wars-movie-on-Mac/)
Firefox and, Opera my beloved, was the thing during the 2010s
Now that you mention it, i think i remember using Opera on my phone at the time. I don't remember why tbh, maybe i felt like it was more lightweight and faster, but no clue if that was actually true.
Nobody I knew in college had heard of Firefox, but that's probably because it didn't exist yet.
Unless you mean the Clint Eastwood film
I remember seeing that airplane on the VHS all the time at the video store
I'm on the edge of that, it started existing while I was in college, but was called Phoenix, and then Firebird. It didn't have the name Firefox until I had graduated.
One relatively bright person I knew in college asked me "what's this Linksys you're always talking about?" I had recently setup my laptop to dual boot Arch alongside Windows, as this was back when you couldn't really play most games on Linux.
That's how they became relatively bright, by asking questions to learn about new things!
I'm going to assume that you didn't study a STEM subject?
Computer Science
I can assure you there are lots of people in computer science that don't know what linux, foss or firefox are.
if they are, it’s not much more than "that thing they heard of sometime", i don’t think the layperson really considers them as alternatives to what they’re using.
i remember, when i first switched to an non-chrome browser many years ago, my friends kept asking me if stuff like google, google drive or google classroom (which our school used) still worked on it. many people don’t know the difference between google chrome (the web browser) and google (the search engine)!
Reminded of how, for some unfathomable reason, the way you access the task manager on ChromeOS is through the hamburger menu in the bar of the Chrome browser. Plus the popups "gmail actually works much better in chrome!! trust me!!"
I can see how people could get confused lol
I would give it a coin-flip as to whether the average person could name their current OS. Not sure if I would have to give credit to people who respond "The Microsoft one" or "Google Phone" in order for that bet to be fair.
It'd be a coinflip on whether or not they even knew what an operating system was.
I think more people would know "windows" rather than "the Microsoft one" ? As a layperson we always called it windows 😅 I think people know Microsoft office but I don't know that they would refer to their OS as "microsoft".
I had a client who was the head of product at her buisness. We'd meet at the end of every sprint to do demos and planning. Anyway when my team mentioned there were some issues on Firefox her knee jerk response was to openly say "I hate Firefox users"
I have tons of stories like that but the point is that even people who are aware don't universally love it
Awareness is just the bare minimum
Wtf, what was her reasoning?
more work for her, i assume. how easy it would be of you only had to optimize for internet explorer at 640x480...
Lots of websites work poorly on Firefox compared to Chrome. They optimize for Chrome because that's where the userbase is. If you're not on Chrome then fuck you I guess.
Just on Firefox, dedepends on how old we are talking. Gen z? Probably not as they've mostly know Chrome as having been the best web browser. Old Millenials and young gen x know it as the next IE alternative after Netscape died. Old Gen X maybe depending on how old. Gen alpha and boomers, no way.
If knowledge of both is required, then even less so. Anytime I bring up Linux I get the feeling that it is like bringing up religion with a stranger.
Gen z? Probably not as they’ve mostly know Chrome as having been the best web browser.
Chrome hasn't been "the best browser" in at least a decade. Even at its peak, it was notorious for sucking up system resources like a sponge.
And that was in the interim period when people were flirting with Opera and Safari on non-Mac machines as an alternative to old-school IE. I remember having to lobby my office just to get Chrome whitelisted (and then doing it again for Firefox a few years later) because using anything but IE was considered "insecure".
Now it's mostly won default status because of the Android OS rendering it the default (much like how Edge is the default on Windows and Safari on Mac). Plenty of Millennials/GenZ had to make their way to Firefox the hard(ish) way by knowing it exists and realizing how many gigs of memory Chrome was eating up.
Gen alpha and boomers, no way.
In my experience the number one "I made the jump to <New Browser>" conversion stories has been the end-user experience. Edge cleaned up its act and runs relatively smooth now. Chrome is still a bloat-a-saurous. Firefox has to fight with an increasingly locked-down computer experience. If you're using a school device or a work laptop and it doesn't come pre-installed, you likely won't have rights to download it.
If I had to bet, GenAs are the ones most likely to do a Firefox install simply because they're the ones most likely to still be out there buying their own PCs for recreational use.
I was with you until the end. Most Gen A are mostly technically illiterate thanks to smartphones and tablets that "just work." They've never really needed to tinker with their devices and it shows in their technical capabilities. I would bet the average Gen A couldn't tell you the difference between downloading a file vs installing a program.
i think that's true of most people in any generation, honestly. gen alpha isn't uniquely tech illiterate in my experience, look at all the stuff kids are doing to bypass age verification!
there's also that all of gen alpha are kids or teens, of course most of them are gonna be less knowledgeable about stuff than adults lol
Then you have some young people going back to flip phones... they're likely the ones getting laptops, possibly even refurb.
Most Gen A are mostly technically illiterate
That's just memes made by angry childless millennials. Anyone with kids will tell you how frustratingly talented with technology they can be.
I've noticed this even in gen z. Everything is just an app and having a laptop is less common so all they seem to know is phone/tablets which just have apps that work lol. Their troubleshooting skills go as far as "turn it off and back on". If that doesn't work...do it again. Otherwise... it's broken and they need a repair shop or a new phone 😅
Obviously a generalisation but something I've noticed as a millennial. Older gen x/boomers and Gen Z's seem to struggle more with basic computer skills (or what millennials just grew up with so it seems fairly basic!) I'm not particularly techy but I'm always asked by those people (zs and boomers, some older xs) how to do shit on the office computers.

obviously tests aren't everything and don't necessarily reflect user experience, and idk what that jump in safari at the end is from, but chrome clearly has some things going for it.
currently chrome passes 97.4% of applicable tests, firefox passes 95.8%, safari 94.8%, ladybird 92.9%, and servo 89.6% (a lot of the bulk is "easy" stuff like text encoding)
I was expecting worse from Firefox actually. Mozilla have had a lot of layoffs in the past few years.
Yes
People may have heard of these things, but I don't think most people could give an accurate description of what they are.
Yeah, this I would totally agree with.
Most people I come across will have heard of it, but just know it as a browser, and don’t know anything about it being open source or more privacy respecting than chrome (ignoring the even more in-depth question of that still being the case)
If any techy Americans want to see how bad it is, ask random people throughout your day what operating system their computer runs, and discover how many don't know what am operation system is.
I know this change probably happened gradually over the course of time, but it’s truly shocking to me how many people my age can’t do shit on a computer.
I’m in my mid 40s.
Like, this was understandable when I was a kid doing computer stuff and wowing all the adults - the PC was brand new. But people who are my age NOW grew up with this stuff all around them! Like, you didn’t know how to CLICK? You were born in 1983 what the fuck, Carol!
YEP.
I used to work in a library computer lab. It was soul sucking, how many people older than millennials couldn't friggin handle a basic computer. I heard the words "I clicked the 'E' for 'internet'." multiple times A DAY. (Thanks, 1990's Microsoft and No Child Left Behind.)
"CaNt I jUsT uSe My PhOnE?" (Which would be a million more steps on my part...thanks, 2006 apple, and defunding schools.)
The biggest ragebait for me was "I dOn'T kNoW cOmPuTeRs, I'm oLd ScHoOL."
I'm like "PCs have been increasingly commonplace since the mid-1980's. It's currently the 2020's. You're like 56. HOW 'OLD' IS YOUR SCHOOL?! Because somehow you drove a car here!"
I imagine a certain weird kind of "privilege", to have been able to somehow dodge computers and learning this entire time, when they were so often found in homes, schools, and workplaces.
Like it takes significant effort to somehow avoid even an accidental education. HOW?!
It's...infuriating. These rubes can gleefully scroll tiktok and dump all their personal lives into Facebook, but freak out about sending an email.
Many of them were even around to try the Internet during Eternal September and AOL, and now they've exchanged the squishy fat in their skulls for convenient slop.
I'd bend over backwards to patiently teach, but few cared to learn.
Their collective, willful ignorance is why we're fighting a constant uphill battle against attempts to turn the entirety of computing into nothing but a commercialized authoritarian hellscape.
I left that job because if I heard one more "Kids are born so smart with these computers because my (grand)kids can watch their cocomelons all by themselves." I would've snapped and been booked for assault.
Lol /rant
...clearly this is a button for me...I have sought help in the past...
That’s weird because mid 40s (to mid 50s) should be the ideal age to know this stuff right now.
Exactly! Like, how? People who have worked office jobs their whole lives…I just don’t get it
Not so much office jobs, but that the late 70s to the mid 90s was when you had to figure all this computer shit out on your own, in order to play games and connect to the internet and whatever other shit. Before that people just weren’t exposed as much, there wasn’t even really a commercial market. And after that, everything was made simple, pre-installed, easy user interfaces, more technical details were hidden to make it easier for the consumer to consume content without needing to be technical. That’s why around that age group I would expect to be the most tech savvy.
Learnt helplessness has become a real thing around the world.
I know a lot of people who could normally wrap their head around basic computing and troubleshooting in the 2000s, who now go into a near panic attack if the apps on their iPhone suddenly look different...
Systemd+Linux
I said "web browser" when talking to a mac user. They had noo idea what I was talking about till I said safari xd.
Branded language makes us only see one choice, its very anti competitive.
Yeah, like 'google it' instead of 'look it up'
I've heard people referring to the internal search function of a program as "google".
One time someone wanted to use "find and replace" in VsCode and he just said "I google the word and replace it".
your anecdote is making me irrationally angry
Oh god that would trigger me so much XD
Oh it did trigger me as well.
Didn't know how to react because I was so dumbfounded.
This is much more fun when using duckduckgo. "I duck the word and replace it" "I'll just duck the answer"
Edit: I can't type
Suck my duck! quack!
My word my typing sucks 😂
I started replacing "to google sth." with " to search sth." since I use several search engines besides google and for some of them using the brand name is just ridiculous.
"Let me DuckDuckGo that real quick!" quack
Lemme gpt it
Google? Bro, just Duck it!
It's "just ask ChatGPT" now
Oh, that's a funny one. Google didn't want you to use that either, as they almost lost right to their own name copyright (or they did? Can't remember) due to it becoming common word xD
They did not. Names are not copyrightable.
True, true. Checked again and it was trademark they almost lost.
Sadly, they kept it :(
hahaha wow
I google stuff in the brave search google engine
XD
Googol is a hitten for great quantities, it worked great as a word, and it would be great if Google lost it as a trademark. However we have the force to seed a new word that has a similar image.
If the internet was an ocean of content, then we could say "let's ocean it". Ocean as a verb makes as much sense as the verb google.
I've taken to calling it 'The internet App' when talking to none techy people.
The real annoying one is getting people to find the "Start" button on Windows realizing it hasn't be branded that since XP.
What is it called nowadays?
Same, you're not gonna believe who i said it to... My networking classmate
oh no. this tool is too good.

just one loop they don't know about all the others
oh whoops
it's just whoop
and i oop
fedimemes@feddit.uk would love this
The other day my wife was talking about her new job and having to take notes. For the past 30 years I've been keeping notes in text, then markdown in vim, starting with personal scripts, then vimwiki. A coworker showed me Obsidian, which while not FLOSS, does use an open standard for all its files. It pretty much does what my setup does.
Then it dawned on me that my wife and other non-techies just use whatever their computer has on it by default (i.e. OneNote). She never thought to go out and look for better productivity software. The idea that there is tons of better apps out there doesn't register. She has a phone, knows about the app store and gets tons of stuff there but as for her desktop or laptop the idea of apps outside of MS Office and the video games she plays is lost on her.
They just want to get the job done. The fact that they considered a note-taking app at all isn't universally normal. To this day my wife sends me messages in signal as a post-it to remember things, she could have just sent it to herself, but she used to do the same in sms and just applied that forward after I convinced her security was a good step.
We want the best, the nicest, the most useful thing. We apply the same rigor most non-technies use when choosing a car.
They want to fill a need that, at worst, bothers them a little.
My wife did the same on signal. When I showed her the "Note to self" feature she was amazed an. started using it. She use to get annoyed that we would text and her note would get lost but now it doesn't.
It isn't about finding the best, it is about finding better than the worst. My wife needs the features Obsidian has, she says she wished her notes would visually link together. What she doesn't know is that such apps exist.
She wishes she could sync files between her phone and computer and not have to go to a website to get them. syncthing does that.
syncthing + obsidian is a rockstar.
Like everything else Syncthing, it works well when it is working well.
Far from foolproof.
Been using it for 2 years now with a large number of individual shares, 0 issues other than the occasional exclusion list. You must have use cases I don't have.
lol, are you me? Our Signal chat is ⅓ chat, ⅓ grocery list, and ⅓ my wife's notes to herself.
I might be. Have one of us time-traveled recently?
Come to think of it, if we're time-traveling, does recently even have a viable definition?
All my work computers are provided by the companies I work for and per their rules I can only take and store notes using their approved software and on their servers which basically means I work on a locked down Microsoft ecosystem. Access to third party productivity software is simply not possible outside of certain role specific specialist software.
I would guess literally millions of employees have a similar setup so it's not that we are tech illiterate per say, but more accurately in the corporate world this option doesn't exist so there is no point trying.
Outside work my productivity tools consist of a Moleskine notebook with tasteful check paper.
I have worked at places like that. The issue is real. But I have also asked for apps to be audited to get on the approved list. Again not always possible.
But I still think the general issue stands. There are a lot of people unaware of software. I even know developers who have never learned their tools and built muscle memory but instead just used whatever came with their computer because they aren't out there looking.
I feel obligated to mention Logseq here. It's similar to obsidian, but FLOSS (AGPL-v3).
I have a love-hate relationship with Logseq. I fantasise about rewriting it to better suit my needs, but it's definitely a lot of work to do this for both desktop and Android.
I've tried it before and I like the concept but in my head I struggle using something not directly how it was intended. I want content rich notes, not just bullets. Yes logseq has support but it just feels wrong for some reason.
If it was around two jobs ago when I was just copying lots of meetings I would have been all over it.
Also I never was able to get Logseq and syncthing to work. I doesn't seem to let files be modified in the background and would lock up.
I found Logseq to be pretty confusing honestly. I ended up settling on Trilium.
I'm loving Logseq. It's the open source software I support monthly. It (plus what I learned from "Building a Second Brain" by Tiago Forte) changed my life. Having a low-barrier (daily journal everything) place to dump everything (easily discoverable later with back-linking tags) helps me manage my ADHD.
I highly recommend it. Once you wrap your head around the idea that the daily journal is where you dump just about everything, it's pretty smooth sailing. (The daily journal automatically dates everything, then the pages themselves automatically pull a reverse chronological feed of every time you wrote about the thing, and queries allow for more targeted, dynamic searching, like all tasks due in the next week, or all tasks for the project, etc.)
Honestly OneNote is pretty good for the people who like it though. I personally really can't stand rich text editing, I really need a raw view. If I didn't have those reservations I'd probably like OneNote more.
If I could use markdown with onenote I'd use it way more.
an open standard for all it’s files
All that and you still can't use the right "its".
The discussion is not improved by your contribution.
Yet you huge nerds tizz out over the most boring and trite software trivia that's obsolete within hours, but won't learn basic grammar that will serve you your entire life?
I'd like to think that improves things by a tiny amount.
It doesn't.
it doen'st.
name checks out
Literally nobody care's at all.
I imagine the average non-tech person does not even know what "open source" means, let alone able to name anything that is open source.
Even the average tech person doesn't know what it means.
The term was coined by Christine Peterson of the Free software movement, and is defined to specify software that is free and open source (FOSS).
This was after problems with the term "free software" because it was a bad term, that was hijacked to also include software free of cost but closed and proprietary, so far from open source. And free was not generally understood as free as in libre.
After the Free software movement coined the term. The Free Software Foundation also adopted it, and to distinguish they called it FLOSS, for "Free as in Libre and Open Source Software", where the libre means that the code is protected from being "jailed" because it has a so called strong copyleft license, like for instance GPL. So MIT, BSD and public domain are not FLOSS but they are FOSS.
https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source-software
/Nothing in this life is simple.
This is a crippling reality.
Whenever I explain anything I am constantly evaluating how in depth any given node must be expanded for my audience.
I used to think everyone at least knew VLC media player or Firefox, but nope.
Now I first ask which field, if they're CS they know linux, if art, they know blender, if geosciences they know QGIS, anything else is hard
Haha I'm an aspiring game dev and I know a little bit about a ton of software!
...and I suck at most of it. But I can hold a conversation about it at least! :D
P.S: Haven't heard of QGIS tho! My partner used ARCGIS though, and would always get annoyed when I pronounced it "Ark-jizz."
Perhaps theyd be less annoyed it you pronounced it "arse-jizz"?
ArcGIS is the proprietary industry standard, but QGIS is catching up. I personally don't like Arc and have only used it when I was in industry. Even in academia colleges pay for ArcGIS but I just use QGIS.
You can also customize QGIS easily and there're a lot of community plugins. And works well with other open source tools or CLI tools.
Main thing that makes Arc popular in industry is the liability. They can claim they used the best available industry standard software, so the errors are not their fault, and deflect it to the software company. While with open-source alternatives they might be held liable. It's not a problem if the open source is the standard. But that only happens when they were there first, hard to do it otherwise.
QGIS sounds really cool! I'll definitely bring that up so she can practice that Environmental Sciences degree. :)
Insane about the liability angle. I had never considered that! Sounds like far too serious a business for my tastes.
I'm glad there's a lot of open source libraries, and Linux is heavily employed in scientific and academic circles, at least. :)
Yeah, I really like it. But I also started with it because my university at that time only taught open source apps, and later on other universities did Arc but I just did the same thing in QGIS. But when you're starting it might be a little of an adjustment.
They also just released v4.0 with full migration to qt6, I haven't tested it out that well yet.
Btw I am currently working on a programming language that uses custom syntax to do fun analysis related to networks (directed graphs). And I have a GIS support for reading/writing network and attributes. I made it for rivers first, but I'm expanding to all directed graph. I've a mix of Computer and Geosciences background so I had fun doing something in the middle that most people don't.
Edit: I am looking for people to try it out, but I have problem finding people that want to code in a new language, and for network related tasks.
Psh, I've been on Linux for almost 20 years and I'm a guitarist lol
I'm not saying there aren't exceptions. linux users come from various backgrounds, if someone told me they use Linux I don't assume they're from CS. I'm not either. But given they're not from CS, the chances they've even heard of it is very low.
It's just a sad but real fact that when you go out into the real world outside of your online communities with similar interests, people don't know Linux or open source.
maybe orcaslicer for 3d printing people? seems like the most popular nowadays, although it's getting so fragmented with every manufacturer's own slicer branch..
yeah, this is hard
oh, people who do streaming or youtubing stuff probably know OBS
there's also probably a certain demographic for audacity
Judging by how huge share of browser usage Firefox has, I am pretty sure vast majority of normies know nothing about Firefox
lots of people know about firefox, they would just never use it.
1 million of people is a lot. 1 million out of 8 billion is not so much.
How did you get the idea that only 1 million people know of Firefox? I'd say the true figure is at least two, perhaps even three orders of magnitude greater than that. Browser user statistics don't really say much about that.
That was an example for a "grand scheme" of things.

Say, out of 1000000 people only 22600 are Firefox users. That is quite a lot. Now remove two zeros and we get 226 users per 10000. Remove 2 more and out of 100 we got 2 people who use Firefox.
2.26% is a fuck to of people. But if we compare to the whole market, that is negligible. Chrome, for instance, has 68%. Add other chromium based browsers, would make around 75%.
In my 2022 highschool journalism class we were instructed to take pictures from a professional camera, plug it into laptop, transfer the files, and make slides from the images.
First step was fine for everyone, but later I saw a 17 year old plug the camera to the laptop; and then they tried downloading their picture from google chrome.
No disrespect, I have my dumb moments too, but I genuienly wonder what the logic was sometimes.
"download" might have triggered that
well, file:// is a thing. maybe.
you could have a camera host a local web server lol
... i guess i've kinda done that in first robotics (although that was a live feed)
This is true for every field. I have noticed this many times, whenever I was introduced to something new I never expected those things to be that deep. So I have understood that almost all things are shallow in nature to us until and unles we ourself step into it
I bring this up at my job all the time. I work as a software tester, and I'm constantly reminding our BA that most customers aren't smart enough to "just know not to do that"
I study proteins and I chatter on about them, but once in a rare while I'll talk to a normal person and they'll say "like, the food group" or in introductions I'll say I'm a structural biologist and some people look at me blankly then say something about "bone structure". It kills me a little inside.
The most intelligent people aren't those with the greatest amount of knowledge but rather they're the people that are capable of patiently breaking down concepts for their fellow human beings to understand.
Experience has taught me that Intelligence and Wisdom are very different things, and whilst the former can help get the latter faster, having lots of the former in no way form or shape guarantees any of the latter or even that one will get any of it.
I would even say that there's a level of high intelligence but not high enough (I mentally call them "Entry Level Geniouses") that leads people who think they're so much better than everybody else whilst not being intelligent enough to figure out the limits in capability and breath of use of intelligence alone, so they never figure out the whole "All I know is that I know nothing" and don't really start walking down the path to Wisdom. Elon Musk is probably a good example.
This seems like a good thread to ask: I got a spare, handmedown chromebook and wanted to linux it. What the fuck should I do for that?
hmm, if it's an x86 chromebook i'm assuming you could install linux on it like any other x86 device... not sure tbh, i've never done this 😅
if it's ARM, then postmarketos may be your best bet, it's typically used for phones but they have many laptops supported as well. maybe yours would work!
i've seen stuff like crouton, chrx and galliumOS which are all projects that are supposed to help run linux on chromebooks, but they're all abandoned as of now so i wouldn't recommend them.
I've done this with a chromebook recently, first it depends on a model and how old is it. In general you need to disable secureboot in recovery menu, enable 'developer' mode, and allow booting from usb. After that you can install your distro.
When in doubt, Linux Mint.
Windows to Mint, Apple to Ubuntu
If you are completely new don't yet. Find someone to guide you if you are experienced => https://docs.mrchromebox.tech/docs/getting-started.htmlI had to do minor soldering for the ones I jailbroke
If I remember correctly you need to unlock the bootloader by taking the back off it and removing a screw. Then install MrChromebox firmware. Then you can flash a normal linux distro. Ignore all the chromebook specific ones they're all dead and unmaintained. Arch with Sway worked perfectly on my 2015 chromebook with 4gb of ram and the worst cpu ever.
If you haven't installed an OS before, probably find someone who knows what they're doing and ask for help.
Jailbreaking and installing a new OS on a Chromebook usually isn't a simple process, and it can be incredibly specific to the exact model of Chromebook you're working with. Installing Linux is the easy part. The difficult part is jailbreaking the device and installing a new bootloader that can handle non-ChromeOS software. And that process varies depending on what model of Chromebook you have. Some of them will require actual hardware modifications in order to do that, requiring disassembly and reassembly (mine did). For some Chromebooks, it's just not possible at all. And in most cases, there are risks of permanently bricking the device if you do it wrong.
If you can't find someone knowledgeable to hold your hand through it, then you'll need to do lots of research, and not just research into installing Linux on Chromebooks in general -- research into how to do it on your specific model of Chromebook and its specific chipset. Chromebooks are not at all standardized, and exactly what you need to do will depend on exactly which Chromebook you've got.
really depends and you really gotta research if it's even going to be worth your time. there's a site where you can check if your chromebook will work and how difficult it will be: https://docs.chrultrabook.com/
some you have to physically open up and mess with like a screw or two. some use other methods. that site will tell you specifically what you have to physically do to get it working.
Then you have to take into consideration the SSD you have on your chromebook. like will it even have enough space to do anything worthwhile. I put linux on a chromebook and honestly all it's good for is opening some terminals to do some basic things and maybe stream stuff online. that's it. And it can be a struggle to get linux installed so again is it worth your time to have something that could potentially be a glorified terminal station? up to you. Don't get me wrong it's a fun hobby project but that's about it.
I think they'll know about VLC, Audacity and Blender also
VLC and Blender are not really alternatives tho, rather industry standard
When did that change occur?
Since their inception
Blender most certainly has not been the industry standard since it was created.
All FOSS nerds that joined after 2020 only know OBS, charge they phone, distro hop, eat hot chip, and GUI.
libreoffice is getting there too
every pc i've used has had libreoffice, even at my job even though they have licenses for almost everything from microsoft
The “who still uses Google?” crowd forgets most people just want their computer to work, not become a weekend side quest.
Nonsensical argument. Just because a piece of software is FLOSS and non-Google, it is not automatically a "weekend side quest". Big Tech is very happy that these false equivalencies have spread as well as they did, but they don't hold a kernel of truth, at least not anymore.
I get the point, but going away from Google search is so easy.
Gmail on the other hand I understand why people are still stuck using and I don't push them to switch away.
But it drives me nuts that some normies in my life will complain that Google has gone worse, still refuse to switch. There are some who don't know how to change default and I still get it, but there is one mf at my work, he changed his default in edge from bing to Google and when I said since you know how to change default why not use DDG or startpage or honestly any other non giant alternative. He just says too much work.
Gmail was about easiest to switch away from. You can just create a new email account and have two mailboxes. Then update the new email to services as they go.
With banks and financial services in general being a bitch about changing contact details. That's a form and a visit to the branch for each bank, broker, investment advisor, direct fund provider. That's already almost 30 applications. I haven't even counted stuff like vehicular services, government tax portal, property tax portal, electricity provider, gas provider, internet provider. Not all of whom allow changing for email address digitally or without some complicated support ticket.
It's such a mountain of changes I myself have only gotten through the list halfway and it's been 4 years of trying. I can never recommend that to anyone in my family, they'll just hate me.
P.s. This might just be my country specific problem, I understand other countries are easier.
I think it might be specific to your country and it sucks.
Here, banks are required to ask you to update your contact details once a year. You just log in as usually and sometimes they just give you a form to fill out with your phone number, email, physical address and stuff. If it's unchanged, you leave it all unchanged.
Sounds like a dream.
Wow never thought about that, I changed it to all those digitally and it didn’t require much at all. One service required me to send an email and that felt a bit old-fashioned, but nothing like you described.
Yeah it's fucked. And the worst part is, most of these places don't even open on non working days, so I can't even do these on weekend.
My country does have identity theft problem running rampart, so I don't totally blame the services, it's a pain but at least a leaked email password here and there wouldn't automatically mean losing access to finance. I understand why it's been designed such a way, but man it's a such a mountain of a task.
Yeah it’s fucked. And the worst part is, most of these places don’t even open on non working days, so I can’t even do these on weekend.
Yes, because what working adult would have difficulties going to places between 9 and 5 on workdays
It's so stupid. If you're going to have your physical location open exactly 5 days a week for a super important service people need to get to in person... make it tuesday thru saturday or something.
Good luck in your endeavour in case you go that way. I guarantee it feels nice to read those emails in another provider knowing that Google isn’t sniffing around.
oh man it sures takes all my weekend to install firefox and set a search engine
It's surprising the number of people who don't do that last part
Honestly, switching search engines is pretty normie friendly. I've got a lot of non-techy friends or family, that use Ecosia or something. They also did it on their own, I didn't even encourage them to do it.
With things like Linux it's a bit harder. But if they don't rely on any specialized software, they are usually fine with me offering to upgrade their Laptops so Linux. I installed Linux Mint on my Mom's Laptop and she can use it as well as Windows. She never complained about it.
I think this might make for a stronger argument with "Linux" instead of "Google".
Actually most firefox users don't know its open source. I was baffled for years about its inclusion in ubuntu and fedora by default. I even specifically went out of my way to find "open source version of firefox". This is how I discovered it was open source. This was after using gentoo for several years.
I don't understand this, if it's installable on gentoo using the default method of building from source then it has to be open source, right?
Or have I misunderstood gentoo? I considered trying it once, but didn't fancy compiling everything on a potato.
That's the exact point. I didn't realize firefox was open source despite the fact my package manager had probably built it for me at some point.
Happens all the time. Also, nerds tend to overestimate the amount of resources, like time or money, someone would put on something they care about.
Right here in Lemmy I had this interaction where someone argued that if one were to lose their photos because Google had an oopsie, it’s kind of their fault because they didn’t have a backup plan.
I have had a comm literally dogpile me claiming linux wasn't designed for multi sessions or to run as a terminal server.
My respect for lemmy foss forums is in the fucking toilet.
there's a lot of people that hopped on the Linux train in the past few years. which is great, truly. but many of them don't understand where it came from or what it was originally designed to solve. particularly on lemmy, people are pretty up in arms about their opinions of Linux all the time, so I would bet whichever comm was doing that is mainly the new heads. again, love that it's getting mainstream recognition but I wish the combative attitude was at least tabled until they actually understand it.
the recent debate of systemd in here kind of drove home that a lot of people just parrot points without having their own thought out opinions.
Oh let's be honest, elitism has always been baked into linux a bit. Remember the old joke about how to get help on a linux comm? Ask and get told to RTFM even if you detail a complex issue that demonstrates you have in fact read tf m. Say "linux sucks because you can't do X or Y like you can in windows" and they fall over themselves.....
But yeah, the new batch of users are just...you want to gently grab them by the face and say "you're not fucking nero hacking the matrix because a command line interface doesn't make you shit your pants any more my dude. Stop acting like it."
As soon as a kind of Tech starts getting fanboys, you start getting ignorant bollocks about it, not just from the fanboys but also from the kind of people that, just as emotionally, set themselves against the fanboys not because of any understanding of the weaknesses of the Tech itself but purelly as a psychological need to set themselves against the fanboys.
Linux used to have a huge barrier to entry - for example, you used to literally have to understand how CRTs worked in order to configure X and get it running - which kept the fanboyism down and the few whose like for it went all the way into fanboyisms were at least technically savvy so mainly understood what they were talking about, but nowadays the "quality" of fanboys is closer to the level of game, celebrity or or political fanboys - people highly emotionally engaged that don't have any in depth understanding and are only "experts" on the highly visible superficial stuff.
Anyways, all this to say that fanboyism, whilst being a bad way to relate to Tech (IMHO, and the same for people who set themselves against fanboys as just as mindless contrarians), does indicate to me that Linux is definitelly becoming established as mainstream rather than the OS for mainly server side experts and hobbyists that it was for decades.
What I find more disrespectful is people that join the greater community, but who have no appreciation for the giant amount of philosophical and political (on-top of the technical) work that was done to enable the relatively free/libre and open environment we have with Linux-based operating systems today. I find it so sad that GNU haters have successfully established divisive memes such as the Stallman GNU/Linux copypasta. We owe so much to the GNU project and GPL license, and I think we would be in a much worse place today if Linux had not been licensed under the GPL. I am fundamentally opposed to people who try to move the distributions into a less free direction. Some may see this as elitism, but this opposition is not born out of a desire to dominate or humiliate anyone, but rather to protect the many great achievements of the FLOSS movement.
when more and different people get involved for different reasons then they will change things. since a lot of growth has come from nearby gamer communities, they will bring those habits and forms with them.
My experience with the Linux communities here has been the opposite. Very welcoming, and very helpful.
Wait, who was making that claim?
I had a quick look, and all I could see is this post Taleya made where no-one made those claims.
Only Linux? ONLY Linux?
It's the Gnu/Linux ecosystem with a shit load of software.
(yeah which the average person has no idea about, proving the point in the comic 😁)
Thank you Richard, however:
- Not all Linux distributions use GNU.
- GNU coreutils aren't the only or even most important component of a modern distro. systemd is.
Ooooo seems like you're personally invested and did not catch the tongue in cheek drift.
Condescension means "patronizing attitude or behavior"; your comic doesn't show condescension so you probably need the dictionary definition spelled out.
.../s
That's why I try to show people I know how to get FOSS alternatives for their everyday apps. It takes a bit of patience but trust me when I say this: Most people are more tech savvy than you think, they just don't wanna go through a judging community.
People should stop being condescending at all and regardless what it's about.
Okay but litterally everyone knows about Firefox.
I'm willing to concede some people don't know about Linux. But I've never met anyone who didn't know about Firefox.
No. People who are 30+ maybe. But there are tons of people in GenZ (my generation) and Alpha that don't even know what folders or symlinks Edit: shortcuts are. And Firefox is a nieche browser since 10 years or so.
Putting folders and symlinks in the same category is wild. Most people I know (basically every non-elderly non-toddler person) knows what a folder is. Yet only some of the programmers I know know what a symlink is. Not even a chance for non-programers.
At most they'll know what a shortcut is. Which is not the same as a symlink.
I didn't know that symbolic links were a thing until like 2 years into using Linux daily. I didn't know there was a difference between symlinks and shortcuts until I saw this comment!
To save others a trip to Wikipedia, both a symlink and a shortcut store a path to another file or directory. The biggest difference is that symlinks are resolved by your file system, whereas shortcuts are resolved by whatever program accesses them. So if your software doesn't know what a symlink is, that doesn't matter. It tries to access the symlink, and your file system says "oh hey they want that jpeg" and serves them that jpeg. Whereas if your software doesn't know what a shortcut is, it'll try to access the shortcut and be like "wtf this is just a file path, I was expecting a jpeg"
They can also store relative file paths, while shortcuts can only store absolute filepaths. So if your symlink references a file that's in the same directory, you can move that directory and the symlink still works. Can't do that with a shortcut.
Sorry, english isn't my first language and I confused shortcuts and symlinks. I meant shortcuts of course!
I guess I'm a programmer now
I don't know you. My comment doesn't apply to you, sorry.
Knowing what a symlink is doesn't make you a programmer. It's just that I don't know any non-programmer that knows what it is.
I don't know you
I'm Edgar :)
Our generation ! I am part of (older) GenZ myself.
Holy moly you kids are young!
… what do you mean there are 29 year old GenZ's‽
Hah no they don't. My partner doesn't even really know what a browser is, or where the distinction between phone/pc and 'the internet' lies. Sure she might have heard of the word 'firefox' but no way she can explain what it is or does.
that's the true 'average' person. they don't know. they don't understand. they don't even want to know. they just use this magic thing that shows stuff from the internet. they don't even know what a bookmark is, they just 'google' for everything. even google, ffs.
Years ago I watched a friend type google.com into the search/address bar of chrome, click the link, then begin to search. Painful.
Reminds me of the time SEO put a tech blog article as the top link for "Facebook login" and they got a shitload of people complaining about how they couldn't log into this new Facebook and wanted the old one back.
Old habits die hard. It used to be that the search box was separate from the address bar! In Firefox at least. I know I forgot to use it all the time and just went to google.com
This was two decades ago though. Even my stubborn ass has adapted and now I just use duckduckgo through the "awesome bar" as I believe it's officially called. Can't live with google as the search engine though. I need my bangs!
Yep, Firefox and duck all the way these days
Everyone uses VLC still right? ... Right?
"Why does your google look like that"
The vast majority of people I work with in my organization have absolutely no idea what Firefox is or that there are other browsers. You, me, and everyone here is living in a bubble.
Not too long ago, in the internet explorer era, Firefox had a huge market share. Something like 30%. Even if they didn't use it themselves, they probably knew someone that did.
They may not remember it, but at some point they knew.
They may say they don't know firefox, but if you ask them "do you remember there were some people that didn't use internet explorer before chrome?" They'll probably remember, even if they don't remember the name.
There are quite a lot of people in the workforce now who are so young they won't remember that!
opera
I wouldn't be surprised if gen alpha hasn't heard if it because schools primarily use Chromebooks and the only browser is chrome
and a lot of people just use chrome on desktop anyways. not counting all the browsers that are just chrome in a costume

The Kim Jong side eye is great, almost like the Fry futurama meme.
But those notepads. Always with the notepads.
Ok so how different is Firefox from any other web browser? Seems like the basics are all pretty similar. Address bar, bookmarks, click links. But maybe I am showing my bias here. What am I missing?
Chrome based browsers are riddled with privacy invasive features, data collection etc...
Also, ad blocking in chrome is crippled purposely because Google wants ad revenue.
Firefox has less of these anti features, and there are plenty of Firefox derivatives that have none of them.
don't forget that some of chrome is encrypted and only Google gets to see the sauce
where as all of Firefox is available to look at, but it's a mess of years and years of building, so it's impossible to understand unless you're dedicated
I can never see any media hosted from files catbox.moe, am I the only one?
Do you happen to live in Spain during a football game
Looks like there's an outage at the moment
You're not alone, I can't either. Not sure if I've ever been able to.
That’s why I find posts here like “Fast-MBysoon is getting a major update!” funny. The amount of times they just assume you know what it is and then you go into the comments and the only one is “care to say what Fast-MBysoon is?” So many FOSS users just assume everyone knows about their Microkernel-Based YAML Synchronisation Object Notifier project is.
The Fast-MBysoon Project
Fast-MBysoon (Microkernel-Based YAML Synchronisation Object Notifier) is an ultra-low-latency middleware layer designed for distributed industrial robotics.
In high-stakes environments—like automated assembly lines or autonomous warehouse swarms—different hardware modules need to share state updates without the overhead of a bloated OS. Fast-MBysoon treats system configurations and sensor states as YAML-defined Synchronization Objects.
By operating on a microkernel architecture, it ensures that when one robot arm's "Object" (e.g., current_velocity) changes, every other node in the cluster is notified with nanosecond precision, bypassing traditional networking stacks.
Core Architecture
The system relies on a "Pub-Sub" model where the microkernel acts as a high-speed traffic controller for YAML-serialized state blobs.
- The Registry: A lightweight table in kernel space tracking which nodes care about which YAML keys.
- The Sync-Object: A versioned memory segment representing the "Source of Truth."
- The Notifier: A hardware-interrupt-driven signal that wakes up subscriber threads the moment a bit flips.
Abstract Pseudo-Code
The following represents the high-level logic of the Fast-MBysoon kernel loop and a typical client interaction.
1. The Microkernel Dispatcher
This runs in the privileged ring of the microkernel, managing memory gates.
# Kernel Space: The "MBysoon" Heartbeat
function KERNEL_SYNC_DISPATCHER():
while true:
# Wait for a hardware interrupt from a Node
event = WAIT_FOR_INTERRUPT()
if event.type == "OBJECT_UPDATE":
# Identify the YAML object being changed
target_obj = Registry.lookup(event.object_id)
# Validate the new YAML schema against the blueprint
if VALIDATE_SCHEMA(event.payload, target_obj.blueprint):
# Atomic swap of the object in shared memory
ATOMIC_COMMIT(target_obj.memory_address, event.payload)
# Notify all subscribers via direct kernel signal
for subscriber in target_obj.subscribers:
SIGNAL_THREAD(subscriber.thread_id, "STATE_CHANGED")
2. The Client-Side Implementation
This is how a robotic "Gripper" module would interact with the "Arm" module's state.
# User Space: Robotic Gripper Node
import MBysoon_Client as mb
def ON_ARM_MOVE(new_state_yaml):
# Logic to adjust gripper pressure based on arm speed
speed = new_state_yaml['velocity']['vector_sum']
if speed > 5.0:
ACTUATE_GRIP_STRENGTH("HIGH")
# Initialization
# 1. Map the remote "Arm_Status" object to local memory
arm_status = mb.subscribe("industrial_cluster/arm_01/status.yaml")
# 2. Assign the callback for notifications
arm_status.on_update(ON_ARM_MOVE)
# 3. Execution loop
while system_running:
# The MBysoon kernel handles the heavy lifting
# This thread sleeps until the Notifier wakes it up
mb.AWAIT_NOTIFICATION()
Why "YAML"?
While binary formats are faster, Fast-MBysoon uses a pre-compiled "YAML-Binary" hybrid. This allows engineers to write human-readable configurations for complex robotic behaviors that are "baked" into the microkernel at boot time, combining developer-friendly syntax with machine-speed execution.
I found it funny how condescending all the foss nerds have been to the problems in the LTT linux video. So many people were mad that someone unfamiliar with linux didnt know everything and have a perfect experience. The worst part was they had this opinion and attacked the user while demonstrating they had absolutely no idea what the issues were caused by and could have easily run into the same issue.
Are we talking about that original one? Where he tried Pop!_OS and tried to install Steam and the package installer gave a big message that something wasn't right, so he chuckled, TL;DR'd and hit "yes anyway" and was shocked he borked his install?
That LTT?
I'm never gonna fault somebody for unfamiliarity, but we should absolutely fault people, especially ones with any tech experience, for not reading helpful messages right in front of them.
i am reminded about this one time i was doing desktop support at a hospital. super smart doctor was having a problem and i asked them to recreate the problem for me
oh they did... and instantly clicked the error away when it showed up and then instantly looked at my for an answer
i asked them to do it again, same
i was flabbergasted... i had to point out that i need to know what that error was
"oh it's the same thing it always says" was the reply
thankfully i understood the the workflow and asked to sit and recreated the error again.... AND guess what? IT FUCKING TOLD THEM EXACTLY HOW TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM
wow i would hide a note in my chest cavity before they do surgery on me
a bloody slip of paper hidden within my ribcage, enscribed "learn how to read, idiot!"
Both. Neither are what I would expect to be the new users fault. The warning message was vauge. You are about to do something potentially harmful is a warning that comes up on a ton of things like deleting a user or a folder. usually you think about what you're doing an if you know what you're doing then you proceed. He thought he was just installing steam and so he proceeded.
To be fair, LTT has had a very long history of shitting on Linux, while giving Windows a free pass.
I dont think thats being fair and I dont think that is true. Linux users perceive a video showing real issues on linux to be shitting on linux but do not consider a video that contains windows issues to be shitting on windows.
I’m talking about the LTT staff.
Proof of this is that for ten years, they published zero videos specifically about Windows shortcomings, but they did I believe two separate Linux “challenges”, where the main conductor was Windows users complaining about Linux. And while I agree that some of the complaints were legitimate, many others, like UX differences compared to Windows, definitely are not.
watch the 30 day windows challenge or the tons of videos about various windows bugs. In what would would we expect their coverage of windows to be the same as linux? Windows is used by majority of their audience it doesnt have the same preconceived notions that linux has so the approach will be different. They have no shortage of negative coverage of windows shortcomings, its issues, its bugs.
There are no 30 day windows challenge videos?
There are a bunch of videos about how to configure windows “the right way”, which, to me, seems like a way of coping with the negative side of windows without questioning it too much.
And look, I get that windows users may have trouble with Linux. But LTT have been overly critical and even dismissive of Linux for the longest time. There are videos as recent as 2022 where some of the complains about Linux were straight up “I don’t like how this works”.
Ok I tried to find this and you're right there isnt a 30 day window challenge. I could have sworn there was but I was wrong. I still dont think LTT is overly critical of linux and im a regular viewer and WAN show listener. There is usually a few linux shills on staff dropping references and shitting on windows.
What you describe is a very recent phenomenon. They all were Windows exclusive until around when Microsoft announced the Windows 10 EoL date. Up to that point, pretty much every single video touching Linux, and especially those with Linus as the protagonist, were quite negative, sometimes for no reason at all, e.g. when he complained about UI elements that weren’t aligned with the Windows UX.
And this isn’t new either. Linus has a bias, like everyone else, and that’s fine, but one cannot play personal preferences as the gold standard, see his long term opinion about the iPhone vs Android, or his early videos trying to use Linux. The latter especially are famous in the Linux community of creators, you can find several reaction videos commenting on the topic.
it's different when they become informed and choose to remain part of the problem for convinience ☹️
The real problem is when people gatekeep cool open source projects. Not a great way to grow a community.
like i said, convinience over morality
Yeah...

lokening???
It comes from anglish "loken" meaning to heal, it is related to Old English "læce" IPA /ˈlæː.t͡ʃe/ meaning doctor.
Thanks!
What's an oakframe, though?
I made the oakframe in an attempt to loken Gaja. It's a project focusing particularily on the role of the language in how we bring about transformative change, for example through relighting and sighsteer. The question that the oakframe asks us is; How do we move our attention away from the destructive towards lokening.
The oakframe sais Gaja is unwell because of structures of migth which we call the machine, but it also sais that this machine is socially constructed, and so we have the change force to dissolve these structures. The construction of the machine happens through our language and how the language paints our world.
I don't have an official spot for posting about the oakframe right now, because I'm still in the discovery process. I'm also primarily developing it in norwegian.
While I have some concerns about this idea - for one, while using new words like "waxt" as a relighting [replacement?] for "mastery" might be more poetic, it might be easier to spread the acorns of the oakframe with existing words like "skill" - it's still an interesting one.
Have you considered creating a Lemmy/PieFed community for the oakframe to notify people when you do create an official spot for posting about it?
You are right in challenging the words that I'm using. The oakframe is highly experimental, and so there will be words that ends up not getting traction. It is part of the process. It's similar to how you have to allow yourself make mistakes when trying to do a new waxt. Flawlessness prevents growth.
I think that the word "waxt" has potential; It is culturally rooted in Old English, and works in norwegian as the word "vekst". Words like these are easy to translate and keeps their poetic nature because the images of the words are universal and all languages has these images.
Thank you for your suggestions! Right now, I'm just posting a little bit everywhere to increase the exposure in different communities and see what resonates. It would be good to have a place to post, but what I really need is honest feedback.
Every group of nerds assumes average person knows more about their obsession...
This is a really well written post. That's all I came here to say. /srs
The obligatory add-on to a comment that says "that's all I came here to say": this phenomenon can be seen in a great variety of communities and I believe that it speaks for not the characteristics of the FOSS community, but rather some detrimental socially constructed human tendency to feel superior by oppression.
thank you! ^w^
this phenomenon can be seen in a great variety of communities
that's a good point. i'm talking about the foss community because it's what i'm part of and i see it coming most from it right now, but tbh i've had car people give me some shit for not knowing some car knowledge i'm assuming are pretty basic to them lol
I feel you. Interestingly, Linux communities, especially the Arch one, but also programming communities over at StackOverflow, can be pretty exclusionist and elitist, while, for instance, electrical engineering, electronics and other hardware oriented communities feel more inclusive and welcoming. Are there conclusions to be drawn here? Software vs hardware? 😆
I think asking why people use Google these days is totally valid, because it is not even good anymore
The vast majority of people don't give a shit don't care and still would prefer to use it. Hell myself as a technical person in the IT field for 20 plus years would much rather use Google than most of the alternatives out there within the environment that I have to use to do the job I do.
Don't even get me started on how many people don't even know what an address bar is. They Google everything.
I would say software people are actually too accommodating.
Take a look around at what being too accommodating did to the web.
If only they knew what the word average meant.
I think that if you are in this meme, you're either wrong and thinking too highly of yourself, or you need to touch grass there's no way a normal person actually acts that way
The "Dunning-Kruger" effect directly contradicts this. It states that experts will overestimate the lay-person's knowledge. (it's the second, and often forgotten result)
I'm not saying either is correct, there are plenty of reasons to doubt Dunning-Kruger including that it's results are among the "reproduceability crisis" in Psychological research.
edit: yea I misunderstood that.
It states that experts will overestimate the lay-person's knowledge.
That's exactly what the meme is saying.
tbh, i realize that me using "condescending" in the title kinda implies that experts would underestimate, that’s usually what that word means
is there a better word for this? i meant it in the sense of foss nerds being all "if you still use google chrome in 2026 you’re an idiot and deserve what happens to you" to people
Some days I'm one of those people and most of all I am tired.
It states that experts will overestimate the lay-person's knowledge.
Is this not what the comic is saying?