207
38

Here for the Story [Rule]

27d 10h ago by slrpnk.net/u/Gormadt in onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone from slrpnk.net

I need to know what kind of creature this is to figure out what the hell fetish I just got. Wrap me in your skin hair you colourful dinosaur bird.

A snake and the artist has a whole series with this character.

NSFW links follow:

Prophecy part 1

and

Prophecy part 2

Thank you kindly.

I’m going to read this… for research purposes…

To save you a risky click, just in case you wanted to know if they have legs: yes. Not very different from anthropomorphic lizards.

a snake

WHAT. no. Oh.

Now tagged as snake fetish 🫡

But I didn't know! But okay.

You just got a scalie and adorkable fetish.

I'll add them to the pile.

I am currently following the sequel to this comic for the story and not the porn.

Link to the first comic

CW: Snake tiddy

The snitties do feature quite heavily in the comic that's for sure.

Then this link is necessary:

non-mammal mammaries

I guess tiddy always wins over accuracy or they may have an in-universe explanation. I have not read the material.

To a degree...? There is actually a in universe logic to the snitties.

I will need to study the material then

Quite a lot of peen, as well. lol

oh cool, I haven't seen this one

First the story, then the porn

That's the spirit!

I'd be lying if I said I never got sucked into the story before and got distracted in the middle of activities

why does this feel like some roman saying

May I introduce you to a tale of tails...

tale of tails

Sharing the name and no link? For shame 😿

NSFW Link for those curious

Linky link

A lot of the time, the story is necessary to make the porn work! There's a reason why fanfiction writers use characters from another work instead of inventing new ones for their smut.

And TBH, many porn artists aren't that good at porn, or it's just not the kind of porn I'm into. Depending on the porn-to-story ratio and the quality of the story, I might very well read a smutty work for the story.

I feel like the porn part has to be at least reasonably good though, a good story with bad porn is just annoying because you can't really talk about it with others.

Being able to talk about it is very low on my list of priorities when choosing to read or watch something. Also, there are several possible reasons for why I might not like a porn scene - it might not be well-executed, I might not be into the artist's style, it might focus on fetishes I'm not into, it might even be too unethical - though if it's too unethical to enjoy, the story has to be really good to make up for that.

And I mean, this isn't actually an uncommon problem - sex scenes are part of many popular movies and TV shows, and it seems like quite a few people don't care about those scenes but watch the movie/series anyway. See Game of Thrones, though IMO the sex scenes in GoT tended to be better-integrated from a narrative and stylistic POV than in many other works. You could still talk about GoT with lots of people because it was wildly popular and there was plenty of story to talk about.

I found my people!

The story is what takes it from just "people fucking" to something more!

Entered for the porn, stuck around for the story, is some of the best praise I can give to some works.

I recently finished reading all 8 books of Home for Horny Monsters by Annabelle Hawthorne, plus the spinoff books, and I can honestly say that they would have been good reads even if all the lewdity was implied instead of explicit.

I quite frankly can't wait for the next book.

I don't know if I should be proud or ashamed to instantly know the artist and the work this panel is

Proud

A person of culture I see

It's called smut, and it's art

or

erotica

aroace, genuinely here for the story :3c

that's Alfie for you