740
81

But my salary isn’t increasing

17d 9h ago by lemmy.world/u/capcool in memes

There are thousands of amazing older games that run on old hardware. Forget AAA and wade into your backlog or pull out some classic from gog or a yard sale.

Don't chase the high end, relax and start a game of CIV 4 or Anno 1404

In the past 2 weeks, I've played Tie Fighter and Dune 2. Glad I had over the minimum 640 KB of RAM for Dune - it's pricey these days but worth it for a smoother experience!

Dune 2 was my favorite game as a kid. I tried to play it again couple of years ago and couldn't. The UI is so clunky and the graphics are pretty bad.

Brother, we’re pulling out paper and pencil to play tic tac toe with the price of electricity these days

You mean civ V. Hexagons are the bestagons!

Technically very much a AAA game though, four was the first one published by Take Two and after it came out they bought Firaxis

Bought the Shadowrun trilogy for $10 bucks on GoG. That’s gonna be my next adventure.

New shit can blow me.

Enjoy. The first is a bit clunky but good lore points - the second is where it really takes off

Awesome. I don’t mind clunky so much with CRPGs. Comes with the territory.

I feel like everything is being priced to where we aren't meant to have any savings.

The objective is to kill home computing :D (🤮)

Companies want unbounded exponential profits. Now guess where those profits are coming from.

spoiler

It's from squeezing every cent they can from regular people.

You can jump into backlog of older game titles. Its never late to discover GOG gems.

It is weird to see people obsess over the price of a new release AAA game when the classics tend to be better made, less buggy, have a bigger mod community, and much lower specs.

Go back and play the Halo series. The opening scene of the first game still gives me chills. Play Portal. And then play Portal 2.

Check out some old school RTS titles. Planetary Annihilation is a reworking of the old Total Annihilation game and absolutely stands up.

Go try some indies - Blue Prince or Slay the Spire or Darkest Dungeon.

There's no reason to spend more than $20 on a game anymore

There is a reason many good old games can't be easily played on modern hardware.

If you're not allergic to 5-10 minutes of looking at protondb or other resources to understand how to get the game running, this isn't a problem.

I've not yet found a difficult process for getting old games running. They've been around so long that the community has typically documented everything you need to know to get up and running.

I mean... I am used to getting things like modding skyrim on linux, so this is not really a topic needed to preach to me.

But I met countless people who will give up after three repeats of basic installation attempt.

Emulators solve a lot of those problems

Exactly why I added the world "easily". Those who can and know often overestimate what average person can and know.

You can pay more if you just want the Nintendo or Blizzard official remaster. But all the stuff is accessible

I gave my son $10 to buy some Steam games. And I was so proud that he didn't spend the $10 on Roblox or anything, but on a few indie games on sale.

Wait until you're not able to eat. That's when real shit happens.

Can we throw feces at the wealthy at some point? We need to find ways to enjoy ourselves without money.

If you can catch one to throw a turd, sure. Seems a bit wasted considering what else you can throw but I can't say what.

Sick ass ninja stars?!

Dipped in shit

I saw a man in San Francisco flinging excrement like 10-15 years back. This man is us, there is just a time wrinkle.

That man saw what the future had in store for us

Well, I mean, technically if you're not eating you won't be experiencing any real shits. Maybe if they're down to hot dogs, although at that point starvation may seem appealing.

Man ive been looking for updated unemployment numbers but this regime never shows the truth anyway.

The newest numbers are yuge, the best numbers everyone says so, it's incredible, it's all because of me, because I'm incredible, and if it's not then it's Bidens fault, but I'm amazing and Biden isn't, thank you for paying attention to me

🏴‍☠️

How do you pirate RAM?

have you tried downloading more RAM

Well you say that as a joke, but back in the day this was a real thing. Not exactly downloading, because the internet wasn't really a thing back then, but using software to gain more ram.

I was a big fan of QEMM myself and had it in the original box with all the manuals and such. I already had a pirated version through the sneakernet, but got the original on sale as well. I still have that box somewhere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QEMM

At allowed DOS and other TSRs to be loaded into what's known as upper memory. This is the memory in between 640KB and 1MB. This area often wasn't used as it can't be accessed through regular addressing. Tools that need more memory could often address the space above 1MB and was designed for machines with 2 or 4MB (or more). As most games and other software was limited to 640KB it could be a pain in the ass to manage that memory. Often selectively not loading certain drivers at boot to leave enough memory for the more hungry software.

With QEMM this was no longer an issue, shoving a lot of stuff from below 640kb to above, leaving a lot of memory free all the time.

Later some of this was also implemented directly into DOS (I think MSDOS 5 but also other non MS OSes had this). Although I think by that point high memory was often used (the first little bit above 1M). But by that time most machines had more than 2MB of memory and games and other software often used all of the memory, not limited to 640KB. Software developers often used DOS extenders to act as middlemen where the software can access all of the ram without any complexity needed. The extender could just handle it without any issue and the developer could focus on their software instead of mundane things like memory access.

Note the often wrongly attributed 640KB quote of Bill Gates stems from the era. But he never said it and nobody thought that at the time. It wasn't even a real DOS limitation, more of an IBM architecture limitation. And that became the defacto standard which made it harder to fix.

Yeah, that's the reason I need more hard drives, which are fucking expensive!

I think know where this is going:

"NoBOdy wAnTs to BuY gAmeS AnYmORE"

Luckily there are loads of good indie games at low prices with low spec requirements

This is the reason I didn't know I was building that Steam backlog all along

I get slightly bummed about this possible future, but then look at my crazy backlog from over the years and all of the old spare hardware I have kicking around. I could spend years just going back through emulators, let alone the literal thousand Steam titles built up and waiting to be rediscovered. Plus all the fan projects and indie studios that don't require frame gen as part of their base spec.

We'll be ok, we just may have to revisit the Old Ways a bit.

Bread and circuses are getting expensive. The emperor's throne is held by one who could never wield it's authority with the competence and loyalty of the one who built it. What year is it again?

We're forgetting food...

More Americans are skipping breakfast because it's not in the budget anymore

Unemployment max is 1200 a month in my state. Thats nothing.

I think he means the rate of unemployment, not unemployment benefits.

I know, I read it wrong at first too.

picked up a steam deck as a piece of insurance a drew months ago.

it has simply become a darksouls 1 machine.

I love to hate it.

Think of all global resources and all economies that slowly leave imperialism behind. Things must get more expensive without wages adjusting to give everybody their fair share.

I think consumer devices are slowly going to not exist. It will switch to screens that stream from the data centers.

I don't think it'll ever happen fully. There's waaaaaay too much money in selling even 1980s-tier hardware to individuals after a certain point.

Where there is a demand, there is a market. Life, uh, finds a way.

That's no longer the way it works in this new economy (at least in the US). About 50% of all consumer spending is done by the top 10% of incomes. Companies have figured out they can either join the race to the bottom, fight with the competition and eak out meager profits. Or they can just make shit expensive as fuck, have record profits and still have enough customers in the rich. By simply doing less for more money, they can earn more even though the total amount of sales and customers has gone down. The decline in sales is easily offset by the higher prices, leading to more revenue and more importantly way more profit.

This is why there are so many people living pay check to pay check, unable to afford needed stuff and on the edge of losing everything. While at the same time the markets are doing better than ever, so many companies are having record profits across the board. And this trend is expected to continue in the near future. The rich are spending while the other 90% are unsure about the future and limit spending. This furthers the divide between rich and poor and makes companies target the rich and forget about the rest.

Maybe some crazy person would take the risk and try to make something for the other 90%. But in doing so they have to work a lot harder and margins would be slim. Costs are up on everything and anything, so making something regular people can actually afford is hard. Let alone do that and make a profit and be able to keep quality at a proper level. The quality would suffer, lots of outsourcing would be involved, meeting any sort of regulations is hard and costly let alone optional targets like the environment and being sustainable.

The only way companies see a future for less rich folk is with subscriptions. Just load everyone up with a shit load of cheap subscriptions. Can't afford a new $1000 appliance? Not a problem, you get it now and pay later. Not mentioning that pay later means pay forever and the total amount paid is way more than $1000. Plus people have a hard time managing finances with a lot of small loans and subscriptions. It's all abstract till they get overwhelmed with debt. Something that happens more and more each day.

It will be easier to control terrorists that way.

Thank the Lord! I'm sick of islamic terrorists(tm) killing me.

Or did you mean it will be easier for them to control the terrorists as in create them!?

Oh. All terrorists. Islamic, atheist, communist, animal rights, voting rights, environmentalist, democrat...

I basically don't buy games anymore. I started to get the free epic games 2 years ago and this got me like 200 games. I don't play much but when I want, I try a couple until I find something interesting. Playing Disco Elysium now.

Everything inflated but my pockets

everything's going up except for my desire to continue living on this planet

Everythings expensive but my labour

Gun prices haven't risen though

Ammo prices absolutely have

Aw shucks... Anyways, back to playing GunZ, runescape, and KOTOR for a third decade. Woo!

But really, even if you aren't stuck in 200X, there's plenty of good stuff out there that isn't too demanding to run.

Is there a lemmy equiv for patientgamers?

Here's an instance agnostic link: Patientgamers

Remember gamers! What goes up, always comes down sooner or later. Keep the faith 🙏🏻

is this like reverse "to the moon"? "To the bottom of the ocean"?

Denuvu has been cracked, but god damn almost all the new games coming out using it also run like dookie on my aging PC (Ryzen 5 3600, GTX 1660 Super, 16GB DDR4). The only recent game that runs flawlessly at a solid 60fps is Pragmata.

Wanna build a new PC, but I ain't gonna pay almost twice what it cost to build what I have to get a rig that isn't even better but more or less the same with some extra features like raytracing or dlss.

Even got Crimson Desert on PS5 because I liked it after pirating it, but it only gets about 40fps on my computer. It doesn't run much better on a base PS5 either... But at least it doesn't look ugly as shit when I go inside a building because I don't have the ability to do raytracing and their entite lighting system relies on it. 🤷‍♂️

I always just upgrade my PC piecemeal. The biggest component for you to upgrade first would be your GPU. Even a RTX3060 or a RX6600 would be an improvement over what you have there.

If you went with the AMD option and installed bazzite/linux that would be pretty close to the specs for the upcoming steam machine. You would probably benefit from some of the optimizations Valve will inevitably do for their hardware over the next couple years... That is if you don't need Windows for anything.

On your CPU you have a ton of options on the AM4 platform and 16GB of ram is still very usable.

Or just see what the actual steam machine does on pricing. But I'm no longer as optimistic about that given what Valve just did with pricing on the steam deck.

Even without the price bs rn, I wouldn't have expected the Steam Machine to be more than a sidegrade.

The steam machine will be about as powerful as your PS5. It's unfortunate with pricing being where it is.

I built basically that same PC in 2019 (maybe added that video card later) and was looking to upgrade this year. Nope. Found a new love of metroidvanias...

Denuvo hasn't been cracked. It's just that the first generation of kids less tech literate than their parents are comfortably installing rival rootkits

It's been fully cracked more recently than the initial hypervisor bypass.

Today I finished a book that I picked a while back from a Little Free Library.

.> unemployment is increasing
that sucks :(
but unemployment is just companies betting it all on AI right??
. > PC component prices are increasing
glad i dont need to upgrade.
.> game prices are increasing
am happy with my current games,and i dont think indie games prices are rising.

Unemployment has been flat for over two years straight.

Depends: are you referring to the official US government numbers?

Because I don't know if you've noticed, but the people who have been in charge of that government for the majority of that time are about as reliable as a toddler on crack giving dietary advice.

Besides, starting decades BEFORE that, political strategists started fiddling with the numbers by not counting long term unemployed people who are no longer actively job seeking.

That's a demographic that's gonna be ESPECIALLY big in hopeless times like right now.

In conclusion, it's as likely that REAL unemployment numbers are flat as it is that Donald Trump is going to win the polka dot jersey at the 2026 Tour de France.

So, just vibes then?

There is zero reason to believe the unemployment numbers have been altered by political actors.

All non-government reporting matches the BLS figures. There is an ongoing correction in the tech labor market, healthcare is growing rapidly, hospitality is growing slowly, and manufacturing remains flat.

If you want be in your sads and just dream up some conspiracy, I can’t stop you. But, you should know it’s willfully stupid.

So, just vibes then?

No, verified facts

There is zero reason to believe the unemployment numbers have been altered by political actors.

Other than the FACT that "The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics does not define people as “unemployed” unless they are actively looking for work.“.

All non-government reporting matches the BLS figures

Because they're reporting based on the same skewed criteria.

There is an ongoing correction massacre in the tech labor market

Fixed it for you.

healthcare profit is growing rapidly,

And again.

and manufacturing remains flat. historically low

And one more 'gain.

If you want be in your sads and just dream up some conspiracy, I can’t stop you

Gee, thanks! Likewise, I can't stop you from pretending that everything is hunky dory and that mass layoffs is a "correction" rather than the deprivation of throngs of blameless workers, but someone should.

But, you should know it’s willfully stupid.

Right back at you.

Do you have some sources for the non-government reporting mentioned in your post?

When the tabacco industry tells you that smoking isn't harmful, do u believe it?

When all available data tells you something is the case, do you just believe in wishes instead?