25
11

Every privacy app asks you to trust them. We ask you not to.

12d 5h ago by suppo.fi/u/cm0002 in privacy@programming.dev from github.com

We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.

But "free and open source" means nothing if you can't check it. So:

  • Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
  • Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
  • Build it yourself — don't want our binary? Compile it from source

We don't want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives "trust me bro" is the one you can read.

🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)

Why Github? y👶😭🔫

Exposure.

What do you prefer? Or… are you not a developer and you just want to complain?

out of curiosity, how viable is it for a dev/team to mirror a repository between github and forgejo (for example)?

Quite viable for Git data. Less viable for collaboration state.

Exposure

Then where’s their radicle instance?

are you not a developer and you just want to complain?

protip: for someone to subscribe themselves to this /c/, you HAVE TO pressume subscribers have modicum scripting and setup knowledge. Otherwise you read antisocial for not scoping who would 1) know what lemmy is, 2) subscribe to/c/privacy/, 3) respond in dissatisfaction to centralizing mirrors in fascist servers.

ASPD.

So, what’s your preferred solution?

Ok, now you demonstrating poor reading comprehension. Reread my first answer.

You don’t specify the public git provider you would prefer people use. This is probably because you don’t know what git is.

provider

radicle instance

年配の実業家:〝Guards, this luddite has lost his argument〟

Why would I use their wireguard android app instead of the official one?

They also have a pgp fork😭