Error

Some core developers of Lemmy are hardcore tankies and that attracts others.

Also, for someone from Africa it's weird to claim they are not involved in this. China is strategically investing in African countries. If your country has any mineral or other strategic resources, China is no doubt already there.

cripes.

I love to see dirt on china but I wish there was a better source than BBC since it's not the most credible outlet (right wing aligned).

Do you have any other sources for this?

Has the political stance of the devs ever impacted lemmy in any way? From what I can tell they do a pretty good job isolating their views to their instance. Honestly apart from a few comments I rarely see any tankies.

Yes. As per OP, tankies are everywhere in Lemmy. More so than other platforms, it's hard to miss. OP isn't wrong about that.

If a user isn't aware of tankies, they could easily be swayed by the constant posting of pro-CCP crap here.

I keep reading about this, can you show me some examples of pro-CCP sentiment? Tbf I block political communities anyway but I'm curious what tankie behaviour people keep referring too.

just have a look at genzedong@lemmygrad.ml but put your tinfoil hat on before to prevent potential brain damage

I went to their instance but only found a single post?

Edit: Oh it's a community, but it's contained right? I'm getting pretty tired of people talking about Lemmy in general when a simple defederation solves the issue.

lemmygrad.ml is not federated with many, many other instances exactly because of their authoritarian BS, including dbzer0.com. you might need to log out and visit lemmygrad.ml directly.

If you want the general idea you can also just take a look at yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com and search for lemmy.ml.

I went to lemmygrad to view the user, I know about the defederation I didn't realise you were talking about communities

doesn't make sense to single out any user over there, they are all bootlickers for the kinds of Putin and Xi. Funnily enough, this would make them prime MAGA material too lol

I get it, it's just not a good enough reference for a Lemmy-wide issue. Reddit had MAGA and die hard conservative communities, but they stay isolated; just as I'm seeing here on Lemmy. On Reddit they had brigading issues periodically, just as on Lemmy, you can just defederate on instance or user basis and problem solved.

Cowbee as well

Literally the #1 touter of the CCP and China.

Is wholly incapable of assessing China in an unbiased manner, will only see positives or reframe away the negatives.

Keyboard warrior w a billion sources on anything for his sophistry.

Tbh there is little evidence. There is a lot of shitposting people socialists are pissed off being called "tankie" or communist as a slur. I mean this shit is old. McCarthy would love this "oh you're a tankie!" shit.

The worst I've seen is a communist community discussing that Stalin needs to be rehabilitated for his role in building up the USSR despite his "mistakes" (The big oopsie of 3.3 million dead in the great purge). I mean that is just stupid.

The larger issue is the laser focus the liberal community has on tankies, it's not the fascists that are currently rising or already ruling, noooo it's the "authoritarian tankies" that are at the lowest of their power ever. Whoever has been putting money into this tankie meme is brilliant. Just amplify that shit and stoke that hatred. Fascism bad, but oh please don't be too radical lol.

So basically lemmy failed as a platform precisely because the neoliberal have managed to already cut out the socialist heart of lemmy.

Where are you getting 3.3 million killed in the purges? The number of sentencings to death was ~799,455, and we know many were canceled as the purges went beyond what was expected.

Wikipedia since I haven't read history about this. I know it's not a reliable source but without doing a deep dive, what is lol. And sending people to the gulag wasn't much better than death, so counting the deaths there too you get 3.3 mil. But the precise number hardly matters. Not even the most favorable view matters outside of academia. It happened, it's a mountain of bodies. It simply cannot be excused or rehabilitated. You must say "this was very bad, it must never happen again".

And I'm sure you all would, but then how can you in the same breath rehabilitate the man at the head of the government that did it?

If you want to promote the (undoubtedly many) good things about Stalinism you'll need to repackage, rebrand, rebrand it. Call it early Sovjietism or something.

But part of it is that we as humanity still lacks a good answer about what to do about how the "calculus of power" can subvert anything. There will always be sociopaths, narcissist and schemers that pay lip service while min-maxing their own gain, no matter the ideology or religion. There is no doubt that the worst people did the best during the purges. It must have been an easy promotion bonanza. Denounce, report, promote, repeat. Easy soviet-style rank-maxxing lol. The theory of communism is incomplete without an good answer to this.

Anyway that thread shocked me and gave me a new (worse) perspective on the whole "Liberals vs Tankies" culture war. Maybe the fundamental crisis is that we lack any theory or ideology that can lead us out of the current mess. All existing ideologies have demonstrably failed, and maybe we've reached the limit of what an average person can reasonably learn and understand and execute. People subconsciously know this so as things get more desperate, there is rising intellectual pain or tension and desire that "but something has to work!" and I just want to believe in something!! So people make themselves believe and ignore or rationalize the glaring problems and increasingly shut the door to discordant noises.

Wikipedia shows the figure I gave for the purges, not 3.3 million. The deaths in the gulag system should not at all be counted with those related to cracking down on corruption and terrorist organizing (ie the purges), as a huge portion happened during World War II due to starvation. The Nazis took Ukraine, the USSR's breadbasket, and this caused mass famine that hit prisoners the hardest. The soviet prisons were actually fairly progressive for their time, see Russian Justice for that.

The problem with your framing, that we "must never let this happen again," is that it assumes deliberate malpractice by the Soviets. The purges were a response to real infiltration, corruption, and terrorism, such as the assassination of Kirov. Your characterization of the purges as "soviet rank-maxxing" are absurd and baseless, it was a period of intense paranoia due to the successful assassination of one of the top soviet figures and the discovery of terrorist cells within the Soviet Union. The purges were widely supported by the public, it was not a period of terror.

The deaths in soviet prisons during World War II were causes by the Nazis, not the Soviets. Deaths due to dekulakization, which your Wikipedia article references, are analogous to the deaths of slave owners in the United States. Liberation of the peasants was paid for with the blood of the kulaks, bourgeois semi-slave owners.

There's also the question of "Stalinism." Stalinism does not exist outside of specific socioeconomic policies under Stalin, it isn't an actual ideology. Marxism-Leninism is an ideology, and Stalin's contributions to it are largely limited to advancements on the national question and linguistics. The bulk comes from Marx and Lenin, and moreso Engels than Stalin.

You were given good answer to all of these questions in that thread. The Marxist position isn't that "Stalin did nothing wrong," but that western framing of Stalin is incredibly biased. Your Wikipedia article does this well, it blames Stalin for deaths inflicted by the Nazis, and it capes for semi-slavers, fascists, and terrorists. Stalin of course made mistakes, and there was excess committed under Stalin, there is no doubt of this. However, you take the incorrect stance that Stalin was more bad than good, and do so by also caping for the same semi-slavers and fascists Wikipedia did. This is why historiography is important, and why dispelling the "black myth" around Stalin is important.

I highly recommend Domenico Losurdo's Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend. Losurdo cites near exclusively western sources, and explains both why Stalin is so hated, and why Stalin is so loved as well. It's a history and critique of Stalin's legend more than the man himself, which is important considering how much the figure is distorted by historiography.

You admit to not knowing the history, maybe take that as a chance to dig into it?

Cowbee bringing the receipts, as usual. You're efforts are aprpeciated

Thanks! đŸ«Ą

Look, even if I'd accept all of those explanations as given - at the end of the day close to a million people still were executed.

The death penalty is morally incorrect, at the very least because we know any justice system makes mistakes and you'll execute innocent. And when killing people en-masse like in the purge, there will be a lot of innocents. It might have been deemed unavoidable in 1940, but from today's perspective it is unacceptable, inexcusable, despicable, disgusting.

So - do you *really *think you can convince any emotionally stable person outside your little ivory tower with this Stalin rehabilitation thing? Do you think it makes people more or less likely to want to join a communist revolution were Stalin has been rehabilitated?

And even if you are utterly convinced of being in the absolute right here - you must see how incredibly easy you make it for neoliberals to utterly destroy you on this. Easy and total victory. What a monumental task and waste of propaganda resources it would be to convince people of "rehabilitating Stalin". A right wing think tank could not find a better issue to push into communist communities! A perfect own goal! Is this really the hill you want the hope for a new revolution to die on?

Honestly...

The purges were not simply Stalin lashing out. The purges were done by the broader Soviet government, in response to a real threat. The majority of cases simply resulted in an expulsion from government, it wasn't a naked goal to execute a certain quota of people. There was a real crisis on hand, and the Soviets responded with legal action, those found guilty of treason or other crimes punishable by death (such as murder, severe sexual assault, antisemitism, etc) were sentenced accordingly.

I have no idea what you mean by "ivory tower." The global south has a far more nuanced perception of Stalin than the west does. My stance on Stalin is a common stance among Marxist-Leninists, that he was more good than bad, especially when measured honestly and accurately against contemporary monsters like Churchill.

And no, it isn't easy for Neoliberals to "destroy" us communists. When the Red Scare club of Stalin's black legend is wielded against us, we can do one of the following:

  1. Agree with the Red Scare version of Stalin, throwing existing socialist history and victories under the bus to "save face," which backfires and makes socialism entirely unconvincing, and relies on lying to the working classes just to agree with people that already hate us

  2. Accurately appraise Stalin and put him in the correct historical context. Honestly tell people of his successes and mistakes, without flinching. This is the practice that does result in advancement and spreading of communist ideas.

When picking between lying by regurgitaging Red Scare mythos and taking a principled, historically accurate stance, it's clear that the latter is the only acceptable option. We cannot grow the movement through lies, we need to meet the people honestly, which involves honest engagement with past failures and successes. This does not mean conceding the point to bourgeois historiography.

Essentially, it isn't the communists giving an honest and accurate account that hurts the movement, it's the people trying to distance themselves from socialist history and alienating themselves from historical struggle. Experience shows this, which is why Marxism-Leninism is resurging while anti-AES branches of Marxism are faltering.

Here's the excellent Marketing Socialism by Nia Frome:

When I was a kid I also believed ‘communists should ditch that label, for PR reasons.’ Now I think we make more headway owning it than dishonestly disavowing it. Not least because someone will almost always bring up Stalin no matter what we call ourselves.

Stalin is a powerful trope. His name stands for the perverse emergence of injustice from the overzealous pursuit of justice. It’s dramatic irony, a morality tale about how power corrupts. That mythic trope stands as a barricade for socialism no matter what kind of spin you put on socialism.

The ritual denunciation of Stalin on “the left”:

  1. presents a utopia of socialism without antagonism, flatters first-worlders and academics,
  2. spares people the unpleasantness of interrogating how their ideas about the past were formed, and
  3. makes a virtue of losing and waiting.

First-worlders get to feel better about themselves if they believe that all the socialist revolutions that took place in the third world “weren’t really socialist.” The same goes for denigrating national liberation of ex-colonies as bourgeois, Bonapartist, etc. Intellectuals get to feel more important if they believe really existing socialism “failed” because of faulty ideas. This lends itself to an interpretation of history where ideas are the motive force, and fidelity to the text is paramount. It’s not surprising that they would also trash “developmentalism” as “merely” bringing food security, electricity, literacy, education, industry, healthcare, job security, etc.

What are the crimes normally attributed to Stalin? The show trials, the purges, the gulag, forced collectivization
 in other words: state violence. The socialisms that define themselves in opposition to Stalin therefore downplay state violence as much as they can. This yields a socialism that’s just trying to sell itself to people like any other commodity. Disavowing negativity/terror means ignoring that the USSR made the world a better place partly by scaring porkie.

The question of who’s doing violence to whom, and to what end, is the fundamental problem of politics. It’s capitalism’s answer to this question that makes us hate it so much. “Nobody does violence to anybody” sounds good, but it’s not actually a political position. Political positions require charting out a plausible course from where we are now into the glorious future ahead, and that path goes through socialist states. Statehood is (a monopoly on legitimate) violence. Thus, the demonization of Stalin is the demonization of socialist statehood itself.

In other words, pretending our new thing is sui generis and doesn’t have anything to do with “Stalinism” doesn’t actually mean we’ll face different problems, or have better solutions. Stalin faced problems that were generic to socialism. Socialism isn’t just an infinitely malleable brand in need of better marketing, it’s a class project with definite and durable contours. We don’t actually transcend these problems just by calling ourselves something else, just like we don’t transcend capitalism by calling ourselves post-capitalist.

Anticommunism is most efficiently compressed and transmitted as demonization of Stalin, and it stands in the way of Americans joining any possible global left wing project, since it prejudices them against left authority everywhere (but especially overseas). International solidarity requires that we abandon great power chauvinism. Hatred of Stalin reinforces great power chauvinism, therefore defending Stalin weakens it.

If we decline to draw from the entire history of socialism-in-power in favor of utopian socialism or pragmatic liberalism, the range of results we can obtain will be limited to those achieved by utopian socialism (evanescent communes) and pragmatic liberalism (hellworld).

Read the Losurdo text I linked.

I'm sorry but not one part of your comment shows any problem with lemmy. We're using federated social media specifically so any instance/community can exist is a vacuum, and that includes those you do not agree with.

There are plenty of comms not having anything to do with politics that thrive, politically loaded content does slip into my feed and discussion is rarely uncivilised - on par with early reddit days.

lemmy failed as a platform

This is exactly my problem, you think lemmy is one platform. It is not. It's interconnected but seperate bubbles of activity that are brought together by federation, which has always been optional.

Very early on there was a hard-coded slur censor list that was eventually changed to be settable by the instance admin, that's about it.

From what I understand, the devs are not injecting their political views into the Lemmy code. That does not mean they have not had a pro-tankie influence on the Lemmy community. As the original developers, they also set up the first major instance, lemmy.ml and they moderate that instance to have a tankie lean. Since it was the first instance, many people created their first account for it and it was the de facto standard place to start communities. As far as I know, it is still one of the most active instances.

Judging by active users, lemmy.world is the default, .ml isn't even top 3. I'm getting pretty tired of people referring to Lemmy as a single platform while it's entire purpose is to have a decentralized network where federation is always optional.

If you include impact to mean a bunch of bans and defederations, sure?

I'm specifically referring to the devs themselves. Defederation being used exactly how it was intended.

Has dbzer0 defederated from ml?

They haven't, recently feddit was, but unfamiliar with the details.

Lemmy.ml is tankie breeding grounds.

I've yet to see this impact the rest of lemmy when a simple defederation is sufficient.

I love that you think Africa's dog in the fight is because China is strategically investing in Africa and chasing mineral and strategic resources when nearly every single African country's borders were defined by the West, when entire countries were created and colonized by the West, when the US is actively bombing multiple countries in Africa and has been for decades, when the West was literally torturing, raping, kidnapping, murdering, and mass murdering Africans all over the content for centuries, when many African countries are economically subjugated by Western countries to this day by control over currency, predatory loans and structural adjustment programs designed to create dependencies, etc.

Africa's dog in the fight between the West and Asia comes primarily from the West's total subjugation of the continent.

And there's the tankie whataboutism I have been expecting. Everything you said is true, but my point is that China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China. African countries very much need to be aware of that.

China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China

Yes, sure, it's not altruistic. But there's a huge difference between non-violent trade relationships which benefit one party more, and also benefit the other party, just less, and purposefully ensuring that an entire continent is in a constant state of civil war and desperate poverty so you can extract the maximum amount of resources through slavery. China's foreign policy is absolutely for its own benefit but they're taking a "rising tide lifts all boats" approach there and while there are some specific things which are fair to criticise it's way better than what other major powers are doing.

As a westerner, is it really true that all Chinese investors in Africa really don’t care in the continent? It might be true but I have seen no stories showing positive relationships. That may be by design in western media?

Holy shit? You think this history is whataboutism? The OP said "I don't have a dog in this fight [because I am from Africa]" and you said "[you should have a dog in the fight because of China's behavior]"

Hello? Reading comprehension? How does establishing that OP should have a dog in the fight because of Western history in Africa become "whataboutism"?

This is thought termination at its finest

Also, what the hell would it mean to you for one country to "care about" a continent? You're basically doing the meme:

We have a winner

The west decimating Africa shouldn't mean China gets to, too.

This is irrelevant to OP's point about Lemmy being pro-CCP.

Are you literally just going to ignore the entire other half of the post asking about why people are anti-western and saying they don't have a dog in the fight because they are from Africa? Are you that committed to attacking your political opponents that you can't even see the words that aren't about your desired debate position?

Found the tankie!

See, this is the issue. Someone doesn’t absolutely obliterate China and the .world liberals all wake up and spout their state department talking points. “China BAD! Leftists tankies!”

What about any of that was untrue? Where’s the tankie part? Cite examples.

Anyone who disagrees with my worldview is a tankie

Who's the tankie? The person saying that China hasn't bombed anyone in over 35 years or the person saying "I don't know why they hate the US so much" when the US attacked over 15 countries with tanks, bombs, drones, and missiles over the exact same time period. Might need to check yourself

Ok tankie.

These are the people complaining about lemmy being "overrun by tankies", annoying redditers who are angry they don't get showered with updoots here for mindlessly spouting Reddit catch phrases

Cope

On one hand, Lemmy used to be a safe-space for communists (including those that wish for the USSR back) before Redditors moved in. The developers of Lemmy themselves are politically pro-China and anti-USA.
On the other hand, the USA have stopped being the shining beacon of freedom and democracy they used to be seen as by many people in the west. So anti-USA posts will get lots of upvotes even from people in the west or the USA itself.
And thirdly, the western countries' refusal to speak out against Israel's genocide in Gaza, Jordan and Lebanon has turned most of lemmy against their governments.

China just looks less bad in comparison than it used to be.
When western governments don't give a fuck about human rights anymore, they have no standing to criticize China over it. And when western media refuse to even address an ongoing genocide carried out with western weapons and money, trust in them is lost and people start to doubt whether the stories they tell about the evil adversary China are true after all.

So it's a mix of Lemmy's original board culture, and a major shift in public perception in general.

P.S.: I'd love to read more news and stories from African countries on Lemmy!

I'm interested in your take on the USAid funding cuts. It only made the news briefly where I am amid a long list of disruptions that have wreaked havoc closer to home, but I can't help thinking this has to be one of the worst things that happened on a global scale?

I don't think only investing into business and production is what would help. If those businesses get taken over by venture capitalists or go into stocks, then the motive shifts towards profit, rather than people.

It'd help more if those labour groups were worker co-operatives, and their people worked together with trade unions and left-wing parties to establish community exchanges, and the workers use the profits of cooperatives to:

  1. save for crises, ensuring that even then, workers still can thrive.
  2. establish and support more labour groups in different sectors (media and culture included), being all horizontally federated.
  3. grow funds to outcompete capitalist structures, to take them over and turn them into other worker-owned cooperatives, and so the ball keeps on rolling.
  4. train themselves to defend one another, and learn each other's jobs. This in case scabs (strike-breakers) or cops arrive and arrest some workers

Especially farms, mines, woodlands, -- anything involving natural resources and land -- would be crucial.

Sure, in this age of digitalisation, a lot happens online, too. But even then, at its root, for data centres you need land, water, and resources. For computers, you need minerals, from mines. For cables, you need boats of hardy materials. And for those labourers, you need farms and woodlands to supply them and their clothing.

Thanks for that. It set me straight on a few things.

What do you think about microloans then (kiva, etc.)? Is that a better approach? I know it's more grassroots than a gov program, and I don't know how much of an effect they have in the grand scheme of things.

no one cares because they’re fucking brown. That’s the honest truth. Sad to say.

A lot of tankies will tell you that the Uyghur genocide isnt even happening and isnt real.

100%

You can point directly to people and individuals impacted. And they will deny it to your face or find a way to attack the messenger without addressing the message. They have the word of the state. And as we all know. No State anywhere has ever lied or misled. Or any non Western State at least. /s

Turns out people aren't going to be that moved by a decade of genocide accusations that still haven't been able to produce any credible evidence, especially when they're currently seeing an actual genocide being live streamed in front of their eyes

China just looks less bad in comparison than it used to be. When western governments don’t give a fuck about human rights anymore, they have no standing to criticize China over it. And when western media refuse to even address an ongoing genocide carried out with western weapons and money, trust in them is lost and people start to doubt whether the stories they tell about the evil adversary China are true after all.

In my opinion, of the two shitty governments in question, I believe China actually has the well-being of its citizens more in mind than do the oligarchs controlling the USA. China's quality of life for its people has been rising by leaps and bounds in the past fifty years. Meanwhile over here the best people who aren't in the 1% can hope for is stagnation, while for the majority things are just getting continually worse.

Yes, that was always the Chinese government's deal with its citizens: We make your life better, as long as you don't rebel, resist or demand "freedom".
And the western model was "we give you personal freedom, consumer goods and some participation in government, so you don't demand an actual redistribution of wealth and power".

But in many western countries, especially in the US, the rich and powerful have stopped honoring their part of the bargain, while the Chinese government is holding up their end.

China's quality of life for its people has been rising by leaps and bounds in the past fifty years.

You have a long way to leap when you start out so far behind.

Don't forget the main reason western countries moved all their manufacturing there is because of their lack of labour rights.

the USA have stopped being the shining beacon of freedom and democracy they used to be seen as by many people in the west

Only blind people ever saw it like that. In Latin-America we've known for a long time that USian foreign policy consists mostly in destroying inconvenient countries with resources for profit.

Only blind people ever saw it like that.

Maybe it was wrong to generalize. I grew up in West Germany, so my perception is naturally biased.
The contrast between how the USA used to be seen in West Germany before the W. Bush presidency and now is very, very strong.

I'd say even Reagan already was a very weird president. Before the Watergate affair with Nixon, trust in American presidents was generally high in non-socialist Europe, though imho they went radically overboard with their anticommunism, conflating anarchism and all liberationist movements with what they saw as red fascism.

After Reagan, the surface may have seemed similar to how it was prior, but beneath in the cogs of the American system, something started breaking the labourers of which we see the effects even now. Reagan instigated a new level of arguments for abolishing the state anywhere, such as COINTELPRO, Operation Cyclone, indebting the American labourer while stagnating wages, and so on, and radicalising the discourse step for step.

Definitely Reagan.

American here and I think your wording was spot on.

It WAS seen as a "shining beacon" by many around the world.

SEEN as. And as someone who was born here, I can assure you that many in the US absolutely know that is a facade at best.

The shell began cracking in other parts of the world decades ago (longer in places like Africa), but for most Europeans and the mostly un-terrorized-by-US-military countries, I think the turning point was "WMDs" in the early 00s. When every other "Major" country is either silent or outright saying "we have no Intel suggesting this" then you can't really claim to have moral superiority, and once you see a liar as a liar, it's all downhill from there.

"seen as" was absolutely the correct phrase, as it was only an illusion.

On the other hand, the USA have stopped being the shining beacon of freedom and democracy they used to be seen as by many people in the west of its own citizens.

Are we talking about recent developments here? Because, honestly, I don't think they've been a beacon in a looong time for those of us outside the US.

Yeah a lot of people in the USA thought we’d still had a chance to come back after 9/11, even if the before-times where also a farce.

2016 the mask came off at home and 2024 they’re not even trying to hide anymore

China looks less bad in comparison because it hasn't dropped a bomb in a conflict since 1989. It hasn't fired on a boat since 1988. The US criminal justice system manages 10x more people than the Chinese criminal justice system with more than double the recidivism of China. China doesn't engage in structural adjustment programs like the IMF does and they forgive billions in loans unlike the West. There are grandparents alive today who were subsistence farming when they were 5 and are now experiencing consumer robotics and self-driving cars. China looks good because of reality, not just because the US is recently doing bad things.

So can non-Chinese reporters and journalists come in and check and make sure that reality is true?

And thirdly, the western countries' refusal to speak out against Israel's genocide in Gaza, Jordan and Lebanon has turned most of lemmy against their governments.

You're lumping in a whole lot of countries with America and England there.

Almost like that's the whole point of the anti "West" thing.

This is the official stance of the EU on the matter:
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-position-situation-middle-east/

The European Council strongly condemns Iran’s indiscriminate military strikes against countries in the region and expresses its solidarity with countries affected.

The European Council discussed the deteriorating situation in Gaza and the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, which is of grave concern.

The word genocide doesn't appear anywhere in the document.

Yeah they're not going to use the word genocide without a pretty strict set of criteria being met by an international court. They don't use that word on non-western countries either.

But it is nice to see they repeatedly condemn Israel's actions on that page, which you didn't quote.

I agree. I don't see things overly pro China, but me being from the US, the US deservedly gets shit on. The rich and the crazy have been allowed to completely ruin it. Then, so many countries sucking the Israeli cock is just insane to me. Seems most countries are ran by terrible people. China included.

When western governments don’t give a fuck about human rights anymore, they have no standing to criticize China over it.

I would expand this idea further... since all governments occasionally violate human rights, they shouldn't be very much in the business of calling out human rights violations by other governments. That should mainly be the role of citizens or private organizations, not governments.

That's happening because you're on lemmy.world, which is connected to lemmy.ml. if you look at those pro-ccp threads, they'll be coming from lemmy.ml, the authoritarian socialist website.

My website isn't connected to .ml, so I don't see any of that nonsense.

Also, you can block the whole instance.

Yup. One of the first things I did.

As an end user?

Lemmy was created by communists, for communists. It's gonna have communists in it.

Yea but not the cool kind of communists, the lame kind of Communists.

All the cool communists are out in the real world, robbing banks or something.

I though they were running food banks and offering legal aid to poor folks.

Anarchists. Those are anarchists your thinking of.

The communists are doing the thing they do best. Enjoying comfortable positions in western democracies.

People who think Anarchy can actually work are dumb, though. It could only ever really work within a small community and where you can just kick people out when they suck.

.ml has a lot of cool users.

Unfortunately there are just enough asshats there to taint the entire userbase. I find myself looking askance at any lemmy.ml, also hexbear - IMO it's well deserved. I'd recommend another instance besides those if you want to be taken seriously.

Oh it is deserved, it's bad leadership, along with a sort of hierarchy, they have like enforcer types as well as their partizans.

If you say the wrong thing they will endlessly troll you, not just from their instance, from other non tankie instances.

Hexbear is the worst.

That said, they have a lot of cool users, you just have to stick to certain issues, politics is a waste of time. Yes things are bad in the west they agree, oh you want to improve it? Fuck you, (their attitude towards me and others not you personally,) there is no making it better only full scale revolution will help, they will say.

First thing this is all purely personal opinion viewing stuff from outside and as a general interest in world history.

I am an American but I have lived outside the USA for a couple years and no it wasn't on a military base.

So with that said my personal interpretation is that China is still largely the same China as in ancient times and has decided to take several large chunks of both Communism and Capitalism and add those to the far far larger just continuing to do/be the same as they have for thousands of years.

To put it a different way, it is a case of fix what they feel was/is broken and keep doing all the things that work and from their point of view China has kept itself as one of the largest Nations in history for one of the longest times of any country.

So on the bad side you have things like them being willing to be extremely repressive is terms of censorship. Or the oppression of minorities they don't fall in line enough to the central control of the government. Or minimizing stories that damage their reputation like mining issues.

On the good side they seem to be able to at least partially consider long term large scale society value. At least from the point of view of engineering. The USA by comparison seems to exclusively only consider short term value. Often in terms of weeks or a financial quarter and occasionally the few year duration of a presidential or Senate term.

China also seems to care about improving the average life of it's citizens. This is a big deal and probably the most "Communist" thing. However that also goes along with them seemingly not just allowing but being perfectly happy to have some people have truly horrific lives as long as the baseline average is improving.

For something created by communists, for communists - it's amazing how the loudest voice is people complaining about tankies.

Nobody fights with "Marxists" like "Marxists"

That's the problem with being the historical Main Character for a century and a half

Lemmy was made by communists, seeking to build an alternative to Reddit where communists will not be able to be fully censored. Federation also is similar to how the USSR was federated, and FOSS attracts the left. As such, many areas on Lemmy are going to be pro-CPC (and supportive of socialist states in general).

This isn't the case on every instance, though. Each instance has its own political leanings, some very anti-China and anti-communist in general. It depends on the moderation, federation practices, and focus of the instance itself.

Communists tend to be pro-African, especially the Alliance of Sahel States.

The bit about censorship is cute given .ml and honestly .world as well, are both ban happy for any dissent.

But since lemmy is federated, those two communities cannot censor the whole website

Valid point.

I don't know where in africa OP is but this conditioning of perpetual capitalism glazing we experience in the west might not be something they have to live with, so the constant need to reaffirm rejection of that capitalist propaganda might seem weird to them.

Makes sense, and I understand that.

Less Anti-West, more like Anti-US. And the China drones are another thing entirely.

Putting all patriotism aside, I don't think there's any reality in which the US uses its potential to make the world a better place.

The big difference nowadays is that it's become patently clear that the US government isn't even trying to make the US a better place.

..As for today I wonder what their goal is..

There is no goal other than wealth accumulation. It's a barefaced embrace of the "Gilded Age" corruption and excesses that existed before the bottom fell out in the early 20th century. On a high speed setting.

The underlying vibe is that there is an economic collapse coming (this is why we are in the "Late Stage Capitalism" phase where the middle class is now being eaten alive) and the power brokers and wealthy are grabbing as much as they can before it all falls apart.

Fun times ahead.

America is falling, and this should be an object lesson for the world in what happens when the billionaire classes are allowed to do what they want.

It is okay to set a maximum level of wealth for the ultra wealthy in your country. If not, do everything in your power to limit their policical power.

Protect yourselves.

Yeah, the only reason people are so pissed is because now instead of everyone in the US reaping the benefits of rampant imperialism and global oppression, only the elite are.

Americans are broadly incredibly self-centered and even here on Lemmy the majority of the leftists only consider what is best for them specifically, not what is best for the world.

How did a slave mongering, genocidal colonial empire ever have potential to make the world better?

Goods question!!

That's probably the best way to put it. We used to have a sense of hope here in the US. We could have made things better, raising the global standard. Instead we allowed corporations to poison everything to the point that our leaders are openly evil.

If you had hope in the US, you weren't paying attention.

Yeah - the whole tankie thing is another matter entirely

Ha ha, no. The US never has, and never will, make the world a better place, in our lifetimes.

The US spent a lot of money on soft power, essentially bribing countries to go along with their agenda. Much of that money did actually improve people's lives, whether it was food aid, vaccinations, or AIDS care. Sure, it was to further their own objectives. Sure, it's mostly because it's cheaper to buy compliance than to bomb people into compliance. Humanitarian aid with strings attached is still humanitarian aid, though, or the collapse of USAID wouldn't be such a problem.

Yet at the same time we were couping foreign countries' democratically elected leaders to put genocidal strong men in power, sponsoring death squads in countries with leftist insurgencies in latin america and elsewhere, and making sure western corporations can get in and take their resources to no benefit and real harm to those countries, paying off and corrupting the aforementioned politicians we helped install because they are corrupt.

To say nothing of how we use sanctions, punishing entire countries to ostensibly create regime change, even though that has NEVER worked, and instead cements those regimes in power as people rally around the flag when attacked from without.

The US hasn't been the good guy, since maybe world war II, and that was a one off.

I get your point, but the balance of US foreign policy is overwhelmingly bad.

Anyone else get a suspicious anti-genocide vibe from this place? 😳

As you can see from the above example, the users pushing the whole "America is the only bad country! China is amazing and never does anything wrong!" rhetoric are overwhelmingly from a single instance; lemmy.ml.

No matter the topic of conversation, an .ml user just can't help themselves from virtue signaling in the comments about how much they hate imperialism and how they know that anything bad about China/Russia/NK is literally all Western propaganda.

This is exactly the difference between kids and adults.

You're reading a lot of posts from kids that wear their hearts on their sleeves and advocate for what they think is the "good" side.

There is a way to block the .ml instance, I did so within the first week I joined.

It winnows out the kids.

There are absolutely pro-authoritarian agitators here who feel the need to inject their venomous or smug anti-west rhetoric at any opportunity, just looking to start an argument or push propaganda.

As far as posts about African nations being ignored I’d say that’s par for the course for the West. We’re wildly ignorant about the continent, so much so that we say that someone is “from Africa” while ignoring the 50+ countries that exist there. Our news doesn’t cover it unless we can bomb it or exploit it.

Full disclosure, I live in Africa and don't have a dog in this fight

This upset China

The founders of the platform are tankies. Dessalines, for example, is a tankie that banned me for criticizing china.

lmao gottem

if you are african you definitely have a dog in this fight.

africa has been ravaged by western colonialism not unlike we were.

China is currently doing soft-colonialism in huge parts if Africa. Both the west and China are still huge on colonialism, just in a modern form.

Then the old "It's not <xyz> when WE do it!" always enters the chat.

Anything pro-African is mostly neutral but in essence ignored.

This is sad.

I’m American, and I want the Fediverse to be Euro, Africa, South America heavy. Basically anyone but the usual suspects that dominate news. I want to see stuff from other countries.

I was fortunate enough to get to visit Tanzania, and it was great. It’d be nice if your continent took over the world. Please



Anyway, be aware that many of the authoritarian shills actually live in the US, Western Europe or wherever. Some do not, but the bulk seem to.

They’re just terminally online.

They don’t know squat about what’s actually going on in North Korea or Iran or China, and they wouldn’t be here if they did because lemmy.ml is banned China, Iran, and obviously North Korea.


Talk to the Eastern European Fediverse folks.

They know precisely what the deal is. You do not hear them praising the Soviets, that’s for sure.

Wild seeing it here in .world and other instances all the time. People are entitled to their opinions, but so many comments praising xi or putin are detached from reality. It's like those people don't realize that in those countries just speaking your mind against the regime is enough to get you and your family disappeared in an instant. Wow China has great cities this is true - if you say the wrong thing online they'll put you in a prison labor camp for decades. Ah yes pyongyang is a very clean city - 3 million people died of starvation there in the 90s, they're experiencing another famine RIGHT NOW. Do people not realize the reality or is it turfing?

It brings to mind the Russian citizens holding "no war" signs being arrested at the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Eventually, even ones holding a blank piece of paper were being arrested.

I've only been on Lemmy for a few days but ...

You're on the fediverse. You are your own algorithm. What you see is what you chose to follow or what's on the instance you signed up to. Either way, you ended up there by choice. If this is a thing you notice after only a few days, you are not qualified to predict the doom and gloom of Lemmy. Work on your feed first.

You'll find biased communities on here. You'll find reasonable ones. But you need to go look for them. It's just as echo-chambery here like anywhere else on the internet.

Anything with unlimited, anonymous accounts is not a true town square. It's real easy to manufacture consensus with a bit of effort.

On LW it's mixed, leaning more West, because we're not federated with hexbear or lemmygrad. We are, for some reason, federated with .ml.

The "town square" is former Xwitter marketing to give it relevance, which you could say it had until the son of South African emerald miners got involved. It was due to especially media types being fond of that platform. News broke there, hashtags trended, movements started. That's gone now.

Lemmy isn't that. It's a fediverse place to find mostly niche content for people who got fed up with reddit.

I'm also African. I used to be fairly biased towards west, as in letting them get away with foreign intervention with just minor scrutiny while being strongly against china russia and islam for their downfalls(misogyny, oppression ect). up until the whole files release and that took me down a rabbit hole of learning about reality of 9/11 the magnitude of bias in mainstream media and finally reading about history of socialism and eventually communism starting from Che Guevara

That alone already made me have severe criticism of US as is but what sent me over the edge is how complacent americans are, if these things happened in any other country the entire economy would be shut down by the people, but they're just trying to avoid talking or bringing up this subject, or saying it's out of their power, then the next moment starting a topic about their latest high end keyboard and travel plans, then switching to the difficulties of living end to end

I do my best to try and be kind i swear i do, but things like this actually drive me insane not cause they happen but because of how often it does. I kid you not i'm completely sold that if anyone will stop the west's imperialism and foreign intervention it's going to be another African American or LGBTQ or some minority as usual, because only suffering can bring about change and i do not see suffering from the lifestyles of the americans i talk with, it's always only on paper

The way i see it is they feel unmotivated to reign their government in due to their lifestyle no longer being at the top of charts or better than europe? How does that fix anything in their situation though, and what do i say living off only 2 meals a day to save money? The only thing that got majority of west sphere to hate genocidal regime wasn't their tax money being spent on it but the raising of gas price? Please someone make me central again i'm so sad now

No i'm not paid off i'm just waiting for the American people to pull their weight in all of this or not silencing and smearing people that are trying to pull in their behalf before i can feel the brotherhood bond with them as i do with soviets(not current russia) and china fighting back against RAM cartel and fossil fuels, please

This exactly. Once you start actually engaging with history in earnest, and breaking down the narratives we've been fed our whole lives, it becomes impossible to see the world in the same way.

That would require reading a book that wasn't assigned to them by their government in school, and they'd rather die.

Most of us are not being compliant because we want to be . Most of us are barely surviving and if we fight the system we lose everything. Or housing, our jobs, food, and families

I understand it's very difficult when you're just trying to get by. I truly get that. But if the average citizen doesn't risk the things they hold dear in order to do the right thing, no one is going to do it for you. There's a point where they've consolidated too much power for you to realistically do anything about it. You're not there yet, though it's headed in that direction fast. There's still a window of opportunity.

I would look, for example, to the Ukrainian Euromaidan as inspiration. They risked everything, and many lost their lives. But they succeeded. It can be done. If you give up before the fight has started, what's even the point of being alive?

So... Cowardice and moral bankruptcy.

Trying not to be homeless, jobless, and starving is cowardice and moral bankruptcy now?

To borrow from the famous and possibly fabled merkavist:

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own ruach? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his ruach?

https://www.chabad.org/search/keyword_cdo/kid/11366/jewish/Soul-levels-of.htm

Sorry I haven't single handedly overthrown the most powerful empire in the world.

Most of us are not being compliant because we want to be .

If not overthrowing the entire government singlehandedly is what you think "compliance" means, I have a motorbike to sell you.

I didn't say the thing you are responding to, bro. I said, "Sorry I haven’t single handedly overthrown the most powerful empire in the world."

Have you read theory? Joined a group? Union? Doing any mutual aid? Community garden? Working to form a vanguard? You people are like children. No one expects you to put on a red cape and fly, we do expect you to get off your ass and do SOMETHING.

We are like children.

White Americans have been raised to believe the most preposterous set of lies about ourselves (land of freedom, etc) and the amount of effort to sustain that belief despite all evidence to the contrary is hard to imagine. Effort from the ruling class (eg "god save America" at the baseball game) but also internal efforts from the people themselves - because the collapse of the lie tears your self image apart. This actually started during the George Floyd Black Lives Matter moment but the reaction the other way brings us back to Trump.

People who want real change, and end to imperialism and capitalism feel isolated and hopeless. 1/3 if the country are committed to racism and misogyny. All lot of better off folks just want the illusions of the old normalcy back.

It doesn't help that truly unedited critical voices here get shut down for somehow being responsible for Putin.

Fuck all the way off. Your point does not merit more than that as a response. Fuck off.

You are a lazy, fat, petulant child. You are Veronica in Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. You imagine your slavish cowardice will save you.

I am not fat. which negates your entire bullshit here. Eat a dick.

Jesus Christ forgive me. This creature understands metaphor, allegory and simile at the level of an amoeba. Lord have mercy.

@PotatoPie
Not "current Russia" WTF?
Are you unaware that Russia helped kick out colonialist France from the Sahel???
Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, in particular are doing better than ever, creating their own infrastructure, mining gold and not handing their wealth over to the France.
Only African govts that are puppets of the West don't like and appreciate Russia.

@Imperious_melange

No i'm still learning, my idea has always been that soviets foreign intervention was to support socialism and communism and to fight capitalism, that was their end goal in offering support, and my idea on russia is that their foreign intervention is to combat western influence and push for russian dependency which just means a change in management

It's hard for me to praise them knowing they're just as likely to exploit for sake of nationalism as the US is, but i have no doubt i'm Anti-US even if i'm not pro-russia, i don't take sides based on who's benefited even if it's other africans more so i try to have a full picture of the political scene, that's where i stand

If you have any documentaries or books i can read on russia'a support for independence against france i'd love to go through them!

@PotatoPie
Russia is NOT exploiting Africa. But that is what they WANT you to believe. Do you think France--who is allied with the US & NATO against Russia--is happy about Russia kicking them out of the Sahel?
The Sahel is now fully independent and as I said they're mining their gold and keeping the wealth in their own country and using it to build infrastructure.
But the West is using terrorists to constantly undermine them & Russia helps them combat the terrorists.

Sputnik is state-funded by the Russian kleptocratic oligarchy. I'd rather believe a literal comedian.

And New York Crimes isn't? ROFL đŸ€Ł

I don't read them either. I go by independent worker-owned cooperatives.

Uh huh ..funded by NED.

Well I think it's fair to mention Russia hasn't been socialist since Gorbachev's treachery, but that also doesn't negate anything you're saying.

What is "the west" meaning nowadays anyway? US threatens to invade Europe and is closer to russia than NATO. They are barely allies anymore.

Trump is not some outlier or momentary fluke. The roots of Trumpism go far back and there are material reasons why people support him. So long as those root causes are not addressed, you should not expect Trumpism to simply go away, and the only thing US liberals want is a return to the status quo (the same status quo that brought us Trump).

When Obama was president, the same sorts of voices existed. Trump himself entered politics by supporting the "Birther" movement (a conspiracy theory saying Obama was born in Africa and not the US). The right had a complete and total unwillingness to compromise or cooperate no matter how amiable Obama tried to be. They denounced him as some gay foreign Satan-worshipping communist, and that was while he was keeping the War in Afghanistan going, bailing out the banks, and enacting healthcare reform that was originally proposed by a Republican. This whole extreme-right media sphere developed that needed constant stories to run with, no matter was actually going on.

Before that, we had George W Bush. Bush created ICE, he tortured people, he invaded multiple countries and started decades-long wars of aggression, he enacted mass surveillance which illegally targeted not only innocent Americans but also foreigners, including heads of state.

At what point does it stop being, "When will the US go back to normal?" and start being, "When will the US finally change?" Trump is more mask off, and somewhat more unhinged and unpredictable, but most of what he's done is just following existing trends where they've been heading the last 20 years or more.

If being able to rely on the US depends entirely on the next president for the next 4 to 8 years, that means we can't rely on them at all. I say that as someone in a country that needs its NATO membership.

I would respectfully disagree with the assertion that most people operate in survival mode. I understand Africa is different from Europe. Here, we've had things relatively stable because of our good relations with most of our neighbors (with the exception of russia). If you can trust most of the people next to you, you can prepare for the worst with the rest, but still live life in peace and tranquility for the most part.

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs shows that if you have the basics - such as physiological and safety needs - taken care of, it frees you to pursue higher goals. We've prepared for another war with russia for some 80 years, but we're still a safe, developed nation where most people don't really need to worry about their physiological and safety needs too much, which leaves them free to pursue things like belonging, esteem and self-actualization.

That's my understanding of the situation anyway. I'm not saying I'm 100% right, but that's how I see it so far.

Take a look at Unequal Exhange theory. It explains why Europe and Scandinavia are able to have such wonderful social safety nets. Europe founded the entire concept of the West, they founded the US, and the US is just a faction of the international Western bourgeoisie and sometimes they discipline the content, but that doesn't mean y'all aren't still part of the West, or the North Atlantic.

We're trying. But I am glad to see Europe moving towards open software and more independence for exactly that reason.

which I imagine they will settle down with the next presidency into a more so familiar behavior.

That’s putting a lot of faith in the idea our democracy is still even marginally functioning and Trump doesn’t illegally run and win a 3rd term which then gets validated by SCOTUS and Congress for [insert justification here], or a less bombastic but politically aligned successor takes his place. They’re going to have a hard time finding someone as uniquely obtuse as Trump, but he will die eventually and I have no doubt that’s why they’re speedrunning redistricting, deconstructing mail-in voting, overturning laws, normalizing executive orders as legislation, and embedding the surveillance/police state. They’re won’t always have a demagogue so they are making sure when they don’t their guy still gets in.

“The US/capitalism sucks so whoever the US says is an enemy must be good” is not a new phenomenon. I was raised by people who probably now support Trump and as a teenager began to reject their values.

Early on I found Marx and Che and adopted ML as my worldview. I looted the pin bins at the Army/Navy for old Soviet badges because it pissed off my parents. But the more I actually got involved in meaningful application of my changing worldview, the more I drifted towards anarchism-syndicalism with a willingness to compromise on social democracy because I agree with most that nations are not ready to abandon capitalism entirely and humanity isn’t ready to self-govern cooperatively. My role is to help transition to that, but I now strongly disagree that a top down, state driven approach is the right method. Soviet/Chinese style state reforms might thwart oligarchy and wealth hoarding, but it values the existence and welfare of the state over that of the people that live in the state. And I’ve gone rounds with people over anthropocentric environmental policies that accept present destruction of wild spaces and the depletion of natural resources in the present with the promise that they’ll be fixed “in the future”. There’s always an excuse each new year as to why “the future” hasn’t arrived and the practice needs to continue.

Trumpism is just the current face of American populism/nationalism/imperialism/evangelicalism and our unaddressed legacy of bigotry that finally managed to metastasize and expose the cancer a lot of people always knew was festering in this country. Even if he has been rigging the system, a substantial portion of our population is all in because he does accurately represent them. We’re in a three-way cold civil war between them, the folks who want to go back to “America as usual”, and the far left that keeps pointing out “America as usual” was not great, it was flawed enough to be gamed until we ended up with fascism, and instead of patching it up to get back to a half-broken system, why not use this moment to strip it down and build something fresh. The left then splits on the Chinese model versus a European democratic socialist model.

And neither can be a clean copy/paste. The US and China both have massive borders, substantial populations, world class militaries, access to natural resources, and industry/tech. The US does not have China’s thousands of years of culture, social order, or ethnic majority. Culturally and philosophically we share a lot with Europe, but all those factors that make us comparable to China make it difficult to scale the various forms of Euro dem-soc to the US. All we can do is see what is working positively in countries that have adopted socialist policies and attempt to replicate them in our own experiment with government, but actually analyze if they’re a positive change and adjust rather than cling to failing efforts because “that’s how we’ve always done it”.

Personally, I think a substantial amount of the pro-Soviet hype is coming from American leftists fed up with our country and hoping for a forcible change from their own populist leaders (whom they imagine will be benevolent), victims of American imperialism who rightfully want revenge and to see the nation decline, and Chinese mouthpieces capitalizing on both those opinions while amplifying the fight because the US at war with itself, Europe, and foreign nations China has little interest in keeps US and European influence (good or bad) occupied.

It’s not even about spreading democracy or communism, it’s about imperialism and influence abroad to outsource and mitigate the ugly expense of making life for the people ant home ideal. Europe enriched itself plundering Africa for its people and resources, the US built itself on the blood of those plundered people and eventually came for it’s resources, China’s coming for its resources. Europe justified their actions by claiming Africa was primitive, the US justified itself by claiming it was the natural order and later “spreading democracy”, China’s offering “development” but you guys are going to get the shit end of the deal.

Yeah, there are certain "tankie" instances (such as hexbear.net, lemmygrad.ml) that are like that, and most sane people block them to protect their sanity, so no one counters them

The votes are federated. A CCP critic post by a LW user in an LW community can be up/downvoted by users on any instance that LW is federating with, including the tankie-heavy flagship instance lemmy.ml.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but an LW user should not 'see' the up/downvotes from users on hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml, as LW does not federate with these instances, i.e. LW does not pull any information from them.

Wasn't there a list somewhere where you could see with which instances an instance was federated?

Add /instances at the end of your instance's URL.
(doesn't seem to work for blahaj.zone, probably because it is running on Sharkey instead of Lemmy software )

I don't know of you're aware yet, but the fediverse discerns between two different types of content: local and federated. Local content is hosted on your instance, lemmy.world. Federated content is hosted on another instance and federated with your server. You can distinguish between the two (on the web client) by checking if the community/thread/user has an [instance] behind it. My guess would be that you stumbled into a lemmy.ml community. There you'll find a rigorously enforced "alternative" world view, as you decribed.

.world has a solid segment of unthinking leninist. Who substitute theory for thought. There isn't an overarching ideology imposed on .world however. So you will find plenty anarchist/communist, democratic socialist, and even liberals too. But many of the leninist are very online and much more organized in imposing their dogma. Much to the detriment of discussion and the fediverse as a larger entity. A number of their politics specific instances are defederated from many exactly because they were known for brigading discussions. And while it can no longer be done directly from those instances. They still use accounts on other instances including .world.

Although I'd say it generally skews to the political left, it's a mistake to think of the fediverse as a monoculture. Lemmy as an open source technology is politically neutral, as is ActivityPub as a federation protocol.

At the same time, there are a few hard left communist "tankie" servers, and the creators of Lemmy identify as Leninists, and these types of people tend to be blindly pro-China and pro-Russia.

Personally I do not view either China or Russia in a favorable light... Having said that, I'm not sure I view any country in a favorable light right now, aside from I guess Canada and I guess New Zealand.

Why should we restrict ourselves to countries? Let us take inspiration from societies such as the Rojava, the Zapatistas, and Christiana. Those are great and need support.

Indeed. That would be far too reasonable though.

Hungary has taken some big positive steps lately, which made me very happy for my european neighbors! It's not all doom and gloom. Armenia also kept their distance from the russians, much to my delight.

Have you seen how much bullshit "The West" has been responsible for lately?

I dont think it's strange at all for there to be a strong undercurrent of anti-western sentiment.

Being angry at "the west" is easy, as it's an open book.

Let's investigate other societies and see how transparent their imperial actions are.

Ehhh, not so easy to do..

Whatever.

It's easy because our current geopolitical reality has been contrived by western hegemony.

Plenty of criticism to go around but there's little question that our current reality is mostly a direct result of the decay of western capitalist democracy.

yeah, but we suffered communism and capitalism already. time to build something good this time.

How about a well executed social democracy?

In no particular order:

Markets are good sometimes

Central planning is good sometimes

Meritocracy is good

Social justice is good

Proper allocation of capital is good

Hoarding capital is bad

Corruption is bad

Democracy is good

Authoritarianism is bad

Properly implemented regulations/rules are good.

That's why I came to Lemmy. Sure open source and decentralized and all that too. But somebody on reddit described Lemmy as "Leftist Reddit" and I said count me in!

Not exactly, if Reddit is a single tree, then Lemmy is a forest of trees.

I’m very in favor of personal freedom

And what "freedoms" do you enjoy in the USA / The West (yes I realize you said you're from Africa)? The freedom to choose between two capitalist/fascist warmongers every 2-4 years in your elections? The freedom to have the police state protect private property over humans? The freedom to wage wars on the global south? The freedom to fund and aid in genocide? The freedom to be overworked and underpaid while billionaires extract every ounce of wealth from countries and workforces? The freedom to go into lifelong debt for basic human rights (housing, health, education)?

The majority of Chinese actually believe that China is more free than the United States ... this is more important than whatever a Western-funded "Freedom Index" claims.

decreasing wealth inequality

The CPC (not CCP) lifted 800 million people from abject poverty and have effectively eliminated extreme poverty in the country. China also has higher home ownership rates than the US, higher effective literacy rate, lower infant mortality, lower rates of suicide and gun violence, lower obesity, ... While billionaires exist in China, they do not (and cannot) control/influence government, and corporations do not extract wealth from key industries.

Not only do the billionaires not control the government, if the billionaires are discovered cutting corners or stealing in ways that harm the public good, they get dispossessed, imprisoned, or executed. Remember that distinctly American story about the cost analysis about some flaw in cars that killed people and how the cost of law suits was lower than the cost of fixing the flaw? In China, that results in the death penalty for the corporate executives who oversee those types of decisions.

I would love to have a calm, rational conversation about China with someone who knows more about it than I do. This thread isn't going to be the place for that. Can you recommend a community on Lemmy for learning about the Chinese political system, life in China, and specifically how socialism with chinese characteristics differs from other western ideas on the topic?

As a communist, and one from the US, the idea that billionaires can exist but are incapable of influencing the political sphere just... Does not compute for me. And while I do not expect to change my position to the point where I'm okay with billionaires existing, I am willing to learn. I did not understand Cuban democracy until I did.

This. The petite bourgeoisie cannot coexist. They must prey on society by their very nature. And they know that. As such they know that any actual socialist government is going to be set against them and will oppose it. As you have no doubt seen. The Lambs do not lay with the lion.

Unfortunately the only thing they have to offer you is equal but opposed state dogma. Excusing all repression social and otherwise because of the current infrastructure being built and the temporary uplift it brings to the people there. Once the infrastructure is built it will stagnate just like it did in the United states and elsewhere. A fact that they love to ignore. The United states for all its problems raised the material conditions of many people across the globe not just at home. Just like China currently. None of which justifies the bad they do. It's ultimately not left vs right, or the west vs everyone else. It's us vs the state. And anyone simping for a state is rightly suspect.

Thank you! That's the difference between rhetorical freedom and substantive freedom.

What gets me is how people will look at China's poverty alleviation (actual material liberation from hunger and desperation) and call that "authoritarianism". Meanwhile, the US lets people die of treatable illnesses, go bankrupt from medical bills, and drown in student debt... and for some reason that's perceived as natural.

And on wealth inequality, you're right. The CPC doesn't let billionaires write policy the way the Kochs, Bezos, or Musk do, which shouldn't be acceptable anywhere in the world.

I support a multipolar world order, in a large part because I believe that's what's best for developing/non-aligned countries. Since the US has been the sole superpower and has sought to establish itself as the sole global hegemon, using military aggression to expand its influence and power, it seems pretty natural to oppose it and support competition.

If the US and China are both major powers, then non-aligned countries have the freedom to choose who they do business with, which means they have some ability to bargain for a better deal. If the US or the West were the only game in town, then you'd have to accept whatever they offer, or be shut out of the global marketplace. Furthermore, many of the natural resources of poor countries remain in the hands of the Western powers that seized them through force during colonialism (Haiti is still paying reparations to France for freeing the slaves, for example). Ending this system of neocolonialism is a priority, and that requires an alternative economic bloc.

I don't believe that China invests abroad just out of the kindness of their hearts, however, China has expanded its power through peaceful economic development and trade. China has not been at war with anyone for decades, in contrast to the US which has waged (and is waging) multiple wars of aggression, for the sake of seizing resources. Furthermore, the West will sometimes just decide to steal the assets of poor countries that are invested in their banks, as the did with Venezuela. When has China done this?

Even if you dislike the Chinese system, I see it as a necessity that enabled other systems to survive. The West has a specific system that they want to impose on the entire world, and if you're the only country not doing that system, you're screwed. But China is a lot more flexible, and imposes fewer conditions on domestic policy. This in turn limits the ability of the West to impose their policies, because a country can always choose to walk.

I don't think Haiti is paying reparations to France any more. I believe Citi purchased the debt from France, and Haiti was paying Citi the reparations until 1947.

You're right, I misremembered it. However there have been calls for France to repay the reparations which it still has not done, and Aristide was overthrown in a foreign-backed coup after calling for that.

Yes. All of that money should be returned, plus interest and penalties, and THEN reparations needs to be paid and that's JUST France. The US stole immense wealth from Haiti and needs to return it, with interest and penalties as well.

For those of you picking at OP "not having a dog in the fight", because they're in Africa, that is irrelevant to OP's point.

Because you have to get your friends to move to Lemmy too so the USSR/PRC loving weirdos become a lower % of total user base. Not kidding.

It’s probably because Americans are wanting a revolution to overthrow the pedophile Zionist class that has highjacked our country âœŠđŸŒđŸ‡ŠđŸ‡±

... Albania?

As an example

Not really on topic - but a shoutout to https://baraza.africa/ one of the older pre reddit exodus instances.

Lemmy's core developers are Tankies (radical supporters of the CCP and anyone else claiming to carry on second world ideology, such as Putin) as are many of those running older instances. This includes older instances such as Lemmygrad and lemmy.ml, which makes them very entrenched. Still, they seem to be a very vocal minority, since larger instances like Lemmy.world lean away from that, and PieFed (an alternative but still intercompatible Lemmy alternative) is popular in part from those wishing to move away from Lemmy's tankie developers.

The Lemmy developers explicitly don't support Putin, but it's never been above anti-communists to lie about their enemies

Thank you for bringing a new voice to the conversation.

What do you consider pro African content? How do you view various parts of Africa? How do you see US and Chinese actions from an African perspective? How do you tend to get information about them? How do you personally view the presence of the US or China in Africa?

There has been a major uptick in people supporting socialism under the guise of social programs. Many will claim to support socialism because they favor things like universal healthcare, fair wages, unions, and similar policies. In reality, however, these things have nothing to do with socialism itself. They are social welfare programs that can be implemented under virtually any form of government.

What many of these people are actually advocating for is social democracy, not socialism. The fact that both terms contain the word "social" does not make them the same thing. Socialism, traditionally defined, involves some form of collective or public ownership of the means of production. Universal healthcare, labor protections, welfare programs, and unions do not inherently require that.

The most frustrating part is that many people simply redefine words to fit their preferred narrative. They make declarative statements that are objectively incorrect, then dismiss the actual definitions when challenged. At that point, it becomes nearly impossible to have a productive conversation because you're no longer debating ideas, you're debating the meanings of the words themselves.

Socialism, traditionally defined, involves some form of collective or public ownership of the means of production. Universal healthcare, labor protections, welfare programs, and unions do not inherently require that.

Universal healthcare and other social programs are, in a democracy, an example of the public owning the means of producing healthcare or other industries.

That depends on implementation. But "technically" could be, though I think the reality more often than not is that it isn't.

I agree that this is generally the case, but it isnt the case here on Lemmy. Lemmy has a disproportionately large number of people across the left side of the political spectrum, from people who are as you describe, to actual semi-reasonable socialists, to tankies.

I encourage you to read through my common history.

Socialism, traditionally defined, involves some form of collective or public ownership of the means of production.

Weird to complain about people calling social democracy (a path to socialism) socialism, socialism but redefine socialism to include state ownership of the means of production, in the same post.

Like if you're being strict about what socialism is China and Sweden are equally not-socialist.

It's because USA sucks and China rulez. Nothing suspicious here.

Welcome to Lemmy.

I don't know how true it is for where you live OP, but from my POV in western Europe, capitalism propaganda is non-stop. "Competition is good" is science, not a piece of ideology. "Billionaires are innovators" goes mostly unchallenged. "China is evil" is a fact, and when they do something good it must be because of corrupt intentions behind it all.

I agree that this constant rejection of that propaganda would be weird if you don't live 24/7 with that glazing of capitalism to begin with (which may or may not exist depending on where you live in Africa)

I disagree with the anti-west part. Anti-USA (as government or as an example for ethical governance) then, sure, but with good reasons.

And regarding pro CCP views, it depends on the context actually. You can't just throw everything on a bubble... The thing is that for a LONG time we have been fed by North American or European media the idea that China = Evil and USA/EU = Good, but nowadays, thanks to the expansion of information and people accessibility to other sources (such as the Fediverse), we know that's simply not true at all.

When you see, for example, powerful countries allying to Israel genocidal acts, maintaining civilians under siege for almost 20 years, or just turning their back to it as if they can't see the fucking obvious, you realize these governments are full of shit.

But it's not that people here are anti-west, or that they don't like western people as a whole. In fact, I'm sure most of users here are westerns. We just don't like how big western governments deal with things, and here people can actually talk about it. When you say some of these things on platforms such as Reddit or X, the rigged algorithms will sure punish you.

If you can see the way the entire west rallied behind Israel and then conclude that it's only the US that's the problem, you just support genocide.

Speak for yourself. The US was created by Western Europe and it took the torch of empire from them and then continued making their ruling classes ultra rich and ultra safe. The US invaded Vietnam because the Vietnamese were winning against French colonial occupation. The US-based Citibank bought the French debt that was levied on Haiti to pay back the French slave owners. France still controls currency in some African nations, and only recently have they been getting kicked out of Africa and their bloodsucking has been getting disrupted.

The West is a parasite on the world's people and decolonization will continue until the damage is repaired and every time Western countries provide troops and money and materiel to NATO so they can commit war crimes and mass murders in wars of aggression Africa and West Asia, it's the West that people hate.

It's interesting to get a perspective from someone living in Africa. I sadly rarely hear from you lot there. What part of Africa, if I may ask, comrade?

If you ask me, the fascists that seize the US have indeed made the US to become a danger to Europe. The former's south and midwest rapidly are couping the rest from an imperfect bourgeoise democracy - into a fascist dictatorship. But it wasn't always that way, and this damage must be undone. The root cause of socioeconomic inequity remains to be addressed, while capital and oligarch flight must be halted. By kind and law, and by word and sword.

For there is a lot of good around in the world that we can find and when we look only for the bad, we become addled with inaction, with fear. And that doesn't help the labour's cause.


Most Lemmings are from Europe, North America, or New Zealand & Australia. More rarely will you find those from elsewhere. That, and Lemmy was primarily found on being a hub for Marxist-Leninists.

Though in more recent times more people that align with left-wing movements have joined here, primarily due to the Reddit API greed's exodus. Many came here due to the decentral nature of the fediverse, which is inherently opposed to the oligarchic structures that enabled that API drama in the first place.

So naturally there's a "bias" against capitalism, and since there aren't many socialist larger powers left in the world, that gives a pro-CCP boost. China's government is also often seen as a lesser evil compared to the American fascists, though I prefer neither.


Me? I have my reservations about Marxist-Leninism. I agree with Marxist theory, though.

I would describe myself as an anarchist communist, or a council communist. In terms of where I align, I decline states altogether. But for my own liberty to speak out, I'm not exactly a fan of the Usonian (since they repress personal liberties due to religious indoctrination) or Chinese government (due to their crackdown on class solidarity with queers). In both countries, a lot of people exist that have their own respectable views, but unfortunately, it is leadership that can be the root of repression and corruption. The EU is somewhat decent in terms of personal liberties, though it's far too neoliberal and too little socialist/communist.

Ultimately, I believe that socialism and communism are the better path, and that those are only possible through full liberation and emancipation from repression, including those of queers. I prefer a community exchange system over one where economic colonialism renews itself in perpetuity.

If you'd like some theory, I can recommend Kropotkin's Conquest of Bread, as well as reading on the Anarchist Library.

The CPC is "council communism."

You are right

There's a lot to criticise Washington for right now, and westerners will generally care a lot more about it since it affects them, even if it's only indirectly.

It's also a bit of a reaction to how the western MSM tends to be the opposite, being critical of everything the CPC does.

"Western MSM" includes CBC, AFP, NPO... that's such a huge brush to paint with.

I don’t think the platform is like that, as a whole.

But there are two groups that have created communities devoted entirely to making up strawman attacks against the other and they circlejerk over how much better they are than the other.

If they find a post outside their bubbles, you can guarantee it will have weird votes and comments.

All of the fun communities are free from this though.

I have noticed this around Lemmy and see some of these comments. As a left leaning redditor it is a similar turn off as the Digg beta.

Keep blocking noisemakers untill it's bearable. Sublemmy and users alike.

You're in .world, I sincerely doubt there are that many massively upvoted pro-China or anti-West comments coming from your instance.

I live in Africa and don't have a dog in this fight

You're the prize the dogs are fighting over

Leemy seems full of young westerners with a strong attitude that used to be called "anti-establishment". I think this comes out a lot as overall negativity to the western world, which is seen as authoritative. colonialist, environmentally destructive, and pretty much on the wrong side of any argument by default.

For every post and comment where China and the United States comes up there's at least another companion post and comments talking about it. Just like this thread.

There's about a dozen users who have been arguing with each other for about three years now. Discourse simply cannot be neutral about this dynamic with how they approach the topic.

And just an FYI; Some of the same folks will also crashout if you oppose Zionism, or insult the Epstein class.

Not really. Lots of not a fan of the US but most of western europe seem fine

The internet has been largely anti-west since as long as I can remember, but the pro-CCP thing is newer.

Part of it is because they're one of the only "flag carriers" of socialism, so to speak, and that blinds some really desperate socialists who can't see they are about as far from socialism as America.

Honestly being from Africa and with their belt amd road initiative there id think you have more involved than a lot of us in the west.

Yup I noticed this as well.

I mean as far as the us. there are these folks who like to put up god bless america signs. Now im not religious. I don't believe in god. Still. I look and say. That should be america be worthy of gods blessing. Now maybe europe is doing alright but the us has no basis for asking for accolades.

Yeah you can't even talk about how Mao killed tens of millions of Chinese without getting downvoted. That's present... But less prevalent than the general America-badism.

I do find it weird that we are taught here in Canada, and I assume most other western countries, that Hitler was the worst human being in history. And then I hear Mao had a higher score?

Well it has to be said, Hitler's was blatant malice and incompetence projected outwards. Had he just slaughtered every romani and Jew in Germany. I don't think the world would have collectively batted an eye if he'd stopped there.

Mao was largely incompetent internally. Though those attitudes have only metastasized in the country and turned towards malice which is now being set for export.

I have not but, I’m uncertain whether it is because.. I might have blocked certain people already, blocked an instance, not being active enough or all of it.

Fuck America!

Whatever man. You replied to a Misanthropic Anti-Natalist. I literally despise humankind. We are the enemy. Monsters to most every other creature on this planet. We are destroyers and killers of planets and all life in general. FUCK Humankind. Were there a button or a designer-plague I could whip up to eradicate all human life in this solar system I would literally kill people to get to that button! You like life because you are alive. You like humans because you are human. These are petty fucking reasons to defend them. Anyways, don't fucking reply to me. I won't read it.

American here. As we all know, America is the only important country in the world so there is little need for African content...

Hi Joe, although with a somewhat heavy heart as I think there are some Americans who would say that seriously. I would also love more South African content. It's a beautiful country with an interesting if checkered story and I would love to visit it someday.

That said, there are two things you should keep in mind. First off, whatever instance you're on has a large effect on what you will see on Lemmy, so if you want more African content you might see if there is an instance running in Africa or at least subscribe to communities on that instance. You don't have to join that instance in order to see them, but you do have to go looking for them.

Second, Lemmy has been largely adopted by a westernized population mostly of American and Western Europe origin, mainly because it provides a fediverse system with an experience similar to Reddit. Thus, much of Lemmy's traffic is current or ex-redditors, which are mostly from the aforementioned demographics.

Yes and that’s exactly why I use this place. I don’t want another Reddit. I want a space where a different viewpoint can be fostered.

Too late

The Truth About Tankies

Might be helpful

100%

CCP was a very strong grip here.

I'm going to get crucified for what I'm going to say. But here is when I noticed it. A few years ago lemmy was one of the only places AI was getting hated on very hard. Like other places had some small posts or conversations but they were pretty mature. But lemmy was hateful.

What I noticed was that it reminded me of something at the tip of my tongue. Then it hit me. The posts were all the same posts I saw in republican spaces. Like word for word same headline. Same energy, same bullshit. Except instead of immigrants it was AI.

I'm going to stop you people right there because I know what the fuck the comments will be already. So just stop. This isn't a comment about consequences of AI pro or con. It's a comment about an observation. Something I've noticed and the more I saw the more it made sense.

Lemmy was targeted hard and was one of the early generators of anti AI sentiment. It was impressive. What made it all make sense is that as much as we hate AI, it's here. It's not going away. Like any new frontier, the people who are first to new land will become the powerful and rich for the next generation. If I'm not fast enough, maybe I can make others slower. If we know CCP is here. And we know countries are trying to race their industries to build new patents and innovations in this new frontier, then it makes sense why such a small site like lemmy full of early adopters was targeted. It's why posts were reminiscent of the astro turfing we all saw in republican spaces about immigrants. It's not the there are not problems its about amplification, framing and narrative building.

CCP want western nationals to be behind the ball on innovation. They contributed massively to pushing stories early on about AI taking jobs, raping your women and stealing our way of life. If you really want to see CCP in action then search up the early AI posts here if they haven't already scrubbed them.