AIPAC Wants Democrats to Back Israel. Instead, They’re Turning on AIPAC.
5d 4h ago by lemmy.ml/u/pete_link in nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz from www.nytimes.com
Once the guardian of the bipartisan pro-Israel consensus, it is now a polarizing force in the party.
June 12, 2026, 5:01 a.m. ET
When Brad Lander opened his Democratic primary bid for New York’s 10th Congressional District late last year, he made a promise that would once have meant political suicide: He would not do “AIPAC’s bidding” in Washington.
Now the June 23 primary is almost here, and AIPAC has been a recurring theme throughout the campaign. A progressive Jew and self-described liberal Zionist, Lander challenged his opponent, the pro-Israel incumbent Dan Goldman, to take a “people’s pledge” to limit money from super PACs. He has sent a steady stream of text and email blasts comparing AIPAC with Wall Street and crypto — a new, unholy trinity of corrupting influences in democratic politics.
He has sent a steady stream of text and email blasts comparing AIPAC with Wall Street and crypto
I guess that's something, though it predictably fails to really capture the reality of a PAC representing a genocidal terrorist state.
It's sort of like comparing a mass murderer with a thief and a con-artist - yeah, they're all problematic but the scale's a bit off.
He's a self described Zionist so he's ok with genocide.
“Polarizing”? Isn’t there a poll that something like 85% of Dems support a total arms ban?
A progressive Jew and self-described liberal Zionist
Ooh! Don't worry, he's one of the good zionists, then!