4
4

[PDF] Is the iPhone Birth Control? Causal Evidence from AT&T’s 2007–2011 Carrier Monopoly

2d 7h ago by piefed.world/u/beep in nottheonion from doi.org

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/onion/p/1196561/pdf-is-the-iphone-birth-control-causal-evidence-from-at-ts-2007-2011-carrier-monopoly

The U.S. general fertility rate has fallen by 22% since 2007, a sustained decline not readily explained by economic conditions, contraceptive use, housing or childcare costs, or other commonly cited factors.

We assess the potential role of a different shock: the diffusion of the smartphone. The U.S. rollout of the iPhone, the first modern smartphone, provides a natural experiment: from June 2007 through February 2011, the device was sold only on AT&T, allowing us to identify its effect from variation in AT&T’s mobile broadband coverage.

Entropy-balanced Poisson and synthetic difference-in-differences event studies imply that access to the iPhone reduced births by 4.5–8.0% at ages 15–19 and 3.2–6.6% at ages 20–24, with statistically significant but smaller declines among older cohorts. Placebo analyses applied to Verizon and Sprint’s pre-2011 coverage footprint are null. Taken together, these cohort effects imply that the diffusion of the iPhone deepened the decline in births among women under 30 while suppressing the rise in births among older women.

Overall, the diffusion of the iPhone explains 33–52% of the decline in the general fertility rate among women aged 15–44. National-survey evidence on time use and sexual behavior is consistent with the iPhone reducing in-person interactions, increasing pornography use, and reducing sexual frequency.

The iPhone was pretty awful at first. Internet wasn’t really usable until it broke free of att and their network.

Birth rates are falling world wide and it’s because of cost. People are working more for less free time and less disposable income.

Proposal for the next study:
Compare the drop in fertility rate between users of iPhone and Android

Compare to BlackBerry too. Maybe BlackBerry users were raising that number until the iPhone was released.

This seems like a fairly well conducted econometric study to be fair although I agree the message is a bit weird. I would have to read it in more detail to understand whether their identification strategy is good enough though but this is a working paper so it still has to be peer reviewed in any case before official publication