665
506

Plant Milk Is Better For Us and the Climate. So Why Do We Subsidize Dairy?

2y 8mon ago by lemmy.world/u/jeffw in politics from www.motherjones.com

Need to keep the ag subsidies flowing so that rural areas keep voting conservative

The industry got too big and too reliant on subsidies. A reckoning will occur at some point, it's just a matter of whether it's announced ahead of time or surprises everyone.

Every day the reckoning will be worse than it would have been the day before. That's why it should be planned and not A) ripped off like a bandaid or B) have it fail on its own.

Right now the government is doing practically the opposite and reassuring and strengthening the bandaid despite the inevitable need for it to come off.

I get it. I'm also on board with UBI. Hell, I'm even a vegan that isn't calling for an immediate end to all subsidies for the ag industry even though a vast majority of it is in support of a practice that I believe to be highly unethical and horrendous. But I get that it can't change overnight, but that doesn't mean to keep kicking the can down the road either.

The human cost then will be more than the human cost now. It just will be "future" humans instead of the current ones so they so keep supporting it and making it someone else's problem.

Ok, leave a note behind to explain to your children's family why they're in extreme poverty because some folks didn't want to gradually remove a subsidy in a controlled fashion. Again. You're just punishing more future people. But I guess since you don't have to meet them, you're ok with sacrificing their livelihood.

You will never get a UBI while large amounts are subsidizing specific industries. Wanna know where you can get that money though?

The thing is, I don't even think we disagree that much. You just are taking the one approach I advocated against (but still argued would be better than doing nothing; ie keeping the subsidies) and pretending that's my whole argument. I argued for gradual removal of subsidies to correct the market over time. You are advocating for a scenario that likely will never occur without some other large scale disaster or giant swing in public consciousness (UBI will never occur prior to ag having a market bubble pop.... one will never happen during our life, one has a chance to).

"It's not a good time right now" - the party in power at the time

Too big and too reliant on subsidies is a feature, not a bug. You want your farmers producing a fairly large surplus most of the time, because the harm resulting from a major food shortage is catastrophic. A widespread drought, disease, natural disaster, crop failure, or other shortage needs to be made up with other foodstuffs.

Subsidization incentivizes production even when market rates fall below profitability, which is what happens when production is significantly greater than actual demand.

Sorry, but that's horseshit.

Taking away dairy subsidies would drive up milk and milk product prices, pushing more people to buy alternatives instead. Any loss of employment in the dairy industry is balanced by new jobs in manufacturing plant milks and dairy alternatives. This isn't people being replaced by robots, it's cows being replaced by plants. You still need pretty much the same workforce to package and distribute it regardless.

New Zealand and Australia virtually eliminated agricultural subsidies and their industries are doing just fine.

Only 1% of americans work in the primary sector and that is not only comprised of farmers. Furthermore, there are more farming products than dairy, oats for oat milk have to be farmed somewhere as well.

It's not as if Democrats don't also throw plenty of bones to farmers.

Even if the farmers themselves are likely to be relatively conservative, they're such a politically sympathetic group that no one wants to be seen as "going after hard-working real American farmers!". Things like the Iowa caucuses playing a huge role in national politics don't help either (although the Dems have thankfully killed that).

It's more of a matter of if food gets more expensive you're more likely to be voted out of office

One thing nobody has commented on - how that article slips in a seemingly positive mention of Nestlé (they own the cafe that uses plant milks). That raised my eyebrows.

I'm beginning to notice a handful of company ties to "make perfect the enemy of good" takes like this.

It's enough to drive one to schizophrenia. Everything is a hidden message

C̵̡̢̡̢̙̰̻̘̠͎̟͖̯̉͐̉̊̓̎̽͂͆̈̄̔͊͊̃̔̈́́̂̑̿̐̈́͑͛̆̾̈́́͘̚̕͝͝ơ̴̢̧̨̢̟̳̜͙̝͚̟̞͖̞̲͙͍̠͎̞̫͙̮̦̥̯̹̟̦̘̮̖͛͋̏̂̈́̽̓͊͂̃̀̒́͒̏͛̓̐̅́̽͛̇͆̀̽̋͋̋̈́̍́̓͑̚̕͝ͅn̸̡̧̨̛̛̛͍̺̤͎̮͕̟͇̞̙̞̯̤̭̠̥̰̹͍̮͍͙̫̮͉̫̻͖̜̭̦̱͚͎͖͖͓̹̽͛̊̂̓̿̄̏̊̀̀͌̓̽̏͂̒̂̌̄̄̀̊̆̏͑̈́̊̊͌͒͗̀̎̈́̚̕͝͝͠s̴̡͔̗͖̝͖̫̩̲̗̪̤̯̳̼̲̼̈́́̅̇̿̀̎͗́͗͒̀̿̌̎͐͛̆͗͆̿̓̈͗͌̌͒͒́̚̕̚̚͝ṵ̸̢̥̭͎͍̲̟͍̹͙̱̦̤̮̜̖͕̪̱̼̞̜̖̹̥̜͍̝̑̄̆̍̉͒̍̌̅̏̌̊̇͑̄̂̇͌́̿̈́̾͂̏̒͛̐̐̉̏̕̕̚̚͜͜͝͠͝͝ͅͅͅm̵̡̡̨̻̱̹̙̭͚͔̣̘͎̬̖̝̲͈̦̱͓̤̤̲̲̫̫̩͔̮̻̂͋̄̀͐̀̔̿̊̾̋͐̃͆̕̕͜ͅe̸̢̡͇̤͔͈̮̥͓̙͓̻͙̹̦͔̼͔͛̉́̇ͅͅ

Always follow the money. Nobody does journalism for free.

The dairy lobby in the US is huge money. If you ever want to know why we're making a seemingly stupid decision follow the money, look at the entrenched interests and read some history. We subsidize dairy farmers because we used to subsidize dairy farmers and they spent a bunch of their earnings lobbying for more subsidies.

Except almonds. Almonds are terrible water wasters, and mostly grown in California where they can least afford the water.

Still more efficient on resource utilization than animal agriculture. If you hate almond milk for that reason, you should want the dairy industry completely abolished.

Shit, you should want all animal agriculture banned.

Based and correct.

Eh, there are plenty of use cases where certain land types aren't really arable. Ruminants fill that niche easily.

The catch is that like 80% of the land used for livestock currently could also use crops instead.

https://freefromharm.org/agriculture-environment/saving-the-world-with-livestock-the-allan-savory-approach-examined/

Fwiw US dairy plans to be carbon neutral by 2050.

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/27/1095100351/the-dairy-industry-aims-to-be-carbon-neutral-by-2050-heres-what-it-means-for-far

But we don't need to use all that land. Plant-based diets use 70% less land, including 22% less crop land.

The bigger catch is that 70% of all crops we grow go to our livestock.

We wouldn't need to use those lands if we just ate less meat.

The bigger catch is that 70% of all crops we grow go to our livestock.

this isn't true

Livestock accounts for 77% of global farming land, while supplying only 18% of calories and 37% of protein.

Source

much of that is grazing land, not crops.

Added to what the other guy said (that it's grazing land that HAS to fallow whether used or not), that 77% number ALSO counts the waste from crops we're growing for humans, waste that would be going to an incinerator if they weren't going to a cow or pig.

Very few (if any, depending how you define the breakdown) crops are grown with animals as their focus. It just so happens that's how much of those crops we cannot digest.

I don’t want it gone but I don’t want it subsidized. I’m not planning on being vegan but I’m cutting out a ton of animal protein from my life. I make it a special thing.

So you're saying almond milk drinkers could end up going to hell someday?

/s -The Good Place reference

I feel like trying to compare a water intensive crop grown in a place known for drought to crops that can be grown in many places where water is far more readily available is being a bit disingenuous. You're not comparing apples to apples.

I mean, you could say that we shouldn't be wasting resources on animal agriculture anywhere, but especially in the same places that don't have enough water for crops.

Feeding food and giving water to other "food" will always be far less efficient than just providing a fraction of that water to plant-based foods. Animal agriculture is a waste.

Almond is the worst of the nut milks, but it's STILL way better for the environment than dairy.

What you get in stores is not even really almond milk. Real almond milk would be way too expensive to be competitive.

Exactly... Ughh I still fail to understand why almond milk is popular among vegans. It's very expensive and doesn't even taste that nice...

True. Soy and oat milk can be very good, depending on the brand.

oat milk is the jammy out of all the alt milks imo

Reccomendation on brands?

My favorite oat milk is Oatly Barista, the best soy milk I've tried is from Joya, but I haven't seen it outside of Austria yet. Alpro is quite good and more widely available (at least in Europe). In North America, Silk seems to be great from what I've heard. Store brand soy milks tend to taste pretty bad from my experience here in Germany, but some of them might have improved since I tried them years ago.

Oatly and Califia both have great oat milks. They also have barista milks that substitute for half and half in coffee!

Thank you for the suggestions!

Welcome! Feel free to message with any questions or if you'd like more suggestions!

Even soy milk in the US isn't really just soy milk. There are so much stuff added to it. It's thick too.

I grew up drinking a lot of real soy milk which has a watery consistency that I can get at some Vietnamese / Chinese grocery stores or tofu shops. Flavor is quite different too.

Though I guess the US put thickeners and other stuff into theirs to help imitate milk

Still better than dairy.

N-e-s-t-l-é-s
Makes the very best
Economic Warfare

The average Joe has some say in it. When people buy factory farmed milk, they directly financially support the treatment of animals at these places. Imo people should learn in schools (or look for themselves) at footage from factory farms and slaughterhouses from their country to be informed about living conditions so they can make an informed choice if that's worth it.

and if they don't buy the dairy farmers get their subsidy anyway. like yeah i can make myself poorer buying unsubsidized milk, but kinda sucks you're putting the problem on me.

When people buy factory farmed milk, they directly financially support the treatment of animals at these places.

that's not even true.

Where does the farm's income come from?

Do you imagine they'd get the same amount of income if all people stopped consuming their product tomorrow?

no one buys milk from factory farms. people buy milk in grocery stores.

Tomayto tomahto. The grocery store bought the milk from factory farms with the money they get from their customers. At the end of the day the money from milk consumers still funds the animal abuse.

The grocery store bought the milk from factory farms

i doubt it. they probably went through a supplier.

Congratulations

At the end of the day the money from milk consumers

goes into a pile with all the money spent on bean juice and keeps all those people employed doing the same things they've been doing.

looks to me like you understand that this is a lie:

When people buy factory farmed milk, they directly financially support the treatment of animals at these places.

You're really the personification of the word pedantic. I changed my poorly formulated sentence.

if you didn't engage in hyperbole, no one could waste your time with pedantry.

TIL industries create the demand for these products, not consumers

I know you are joking but with how dairy lobbies get subsidies from the gov they kind of are making their own demand.

Unlike plant milk made from say soy or almonds. Those get no subsidies at all. Nope.

The propaganda for milk (that's still going) certainly had a big role to play.

I cannot help but be reminded of the games that Big Tobacco (and Big Fossil) played pre-90s, all through the 90s, most mostly lost. It used to be "what are you non-smokers complaining about? It's not that bad, etc..." pre-90s. Then, finally most indoor smoking got banned, even in bars. Then the fight moved to "but second hand smoke is not that bad, etc..."

Used to be there were tons of smokers in the United States. Now there are far less. I imagine dairy will go through a similar cycle...with the same efforts to distract and distort - even with a crisis of many related chronic diseases - see the "but almonds use so much water!" nonsense that is almost surely an industry placement.

For another comparison to tobacco, I had many, many family members that worked in health care. Most places in health care allowed smoking, nearly everywhere, at one point. If you see what constitutes "food" and "nutrition" in hospitals, it is easy to draw comparisons. It is almost like they could not care less if you get sick and stay sick, since there is no money in prevention.

People hawk on manufactured consent until it's inconvenient to the point

it's true! did you just discover bernays?

no. Edward Bernays.

Sorry but you got two cows, so you're obviously a paid shill for big dairy /s

individualism

Idk if it's delicious. It's good. Baileys is delicious. Hot chocolate is delicious. A cold glass of milk? Can't say that craving comes up for me all that often.

Yes whole milk is good. Work buys 1% and it tastes like watered down milk.

I wouldn't say it's delicious.. it's meh-lk

My personal theory is that we subsidize dairy not for the milk, but for the cheese. As far as I'm aware you can't make cheese out of plant milks, and we've gotten pretty reliant on cheese as a source of protein and other nutrients in our American diets - especially among children and lower income diets.

You can make plant-based cheeses. And some of them are pretty good. But they lack all of the same properties. Like, you can get a cheese that that when hot will stretch a little bit like the cheese on a pizza, but as it cools off it loses all of that elasticity and is not great for lukewarm pizza. You can get cheese that is pretty decent for lukewarm and hot pizza, but it doesn't have that stretch. It more just rips apart. And you definitely don't have the span of "flavors" of cheese or whatever you'd call it. Some of the big ones, sure, but again, they don't have all the same physical properties.

I don't mind the loss of those properties, but many people do.

Cheese isn't a great source for protein compared to beans in regards to price though.

Honestly, I think we subsidize the dairy industry simply because they've been lobbying so long. Meat is subsidized too. It's the one market that the conservatives are fine with ignoring the mantra of "free market" and support regulating the hell out of it in whatever way supports the "farmers" (big farm is nothing like the labeling suggests and is all headed by big guys in suits who likely never have been on a farm in their life).

Beans can taste amazing when prepared by a competent chef, but often taste like shit when prepared wrong.

Cheese, on the other hand, is much more forgiving of poor preparation. Eat it straight out of the package, sliced and on bread or crackers, melt it into sauces, or grill it, or any number of other uses.

Simply put, cheese is fast and easy, and can elevate almost any other food.

Also, try to get kids to eat beans. It can happen. But not easily, and often you have to do it in the form of chili, with loads of cheese.

You're just describing American children raised in a poor diet. Beans are a staple food among not of the world population, including their children. They're super easy to prepare as well. Talking about the extremely fatty and unhealthy cheese like that is probably one of the many reasons the US is obese and unhealthy.

Cheese is not a healthy part of a diet in any quantity where it provides a significant protein of the person's protein needs.

This. First of all, very few people are ever going to be deficient in protein, at least in the U.S. Secondly, cheese seems like one of the very worst sources. Animal sources in general are bad, of course.

I think it depends on context and how you are raised. I was given exposure to a broad array of vegetables and beans as a kid, and liked most of them, even as a kid. I think its a cultural thing - if you (or TV, or peers, or media) tell kids that "kids don't like X", well, they probably won't.

Both meat and dairy are subsidized because they consume huge amounts of corn, and the corn industry is an even bigger lobby.

I seem to recall people are working on bacteria-produced casein, and so that may, if it could be done at scale, solve the ethical and environmental problems, but I wonder if casein in that form will be just as bad as dairy is in its "natural" form.

Look up: cheese caves. 👍

In short: There is so much excess cheese out there that the US government is literally storing billions of pounds of it in underground caves.

https://www.farmlinkproject.org/stories-and-features/cheese-caves-and-food-surpluses-why-the-u-s-government-currently-stores-1-4-billion-lbs-of-cheese

What the fuck

Soy cheese is called tofu.

Government cheese has been a thing since at least the great depression.

Cheese was one of our main obstacles toward cutting out dairy. I came across a vegan cheese sauce recipe that utilizes blended steamed potatoes & carrots for the texture and nutritional yeast and other spices for the flavor. Been using it for a few years now and haven't looked back yet.

It's hard to find good nutritional yeast though. Since they are quite expensive, it is not easy to try around until you find one, that does not taste like garbage.

Yes it's an expensive purchase, but I buy it once every 6 months or so. It goes a long way and I use little (⅓ cup) at a time.

Some of my family think we're living large because we can "afford" cashew nuts, which we use for many purposes, but don't think twice about spending 3 times more on meat every single week.

Yeah, once you found a brand, that tastes well, it's not an issue anymore. But paying a lot just to notice, that it tastes disgusting, kinda sucks.

Unsure if you're talking about cow milk, plant based milk, cashews or nutritional yeast 🤷‍♂️

Nutritional yeast

Protein can be found in much better food sources than dairy. It's a shame the protein myth prevails in this country even into the 2020s...

Probably because everyone tried only the shittiest alt-malks, assume they are all bad, and somehow don't get heartburn and diarrhea and gunky mouth and throat feel from cow milk. I save all my lactose intolerance suffering for cheese and ice cream.

Seriously though it's the same as people that say only bad things about tofu but have only eaten white American 'recipes' that genuinely suck. Meanwhile Asians happily inhaling literal tons of it prepared in actually good meals. Try making bread from scratch without salt (or salty ingredients) and that's what tofu foods for the white market remind me of.

Tofu is fine, but tempeh is almost as widely available in supermarkets, has a higher protein density, is fermented, and works in soooo many things. It's also way easier to get the hang of marinating and cooking.

I mention this only because I love it so much, and I'd love for people that shit on vegan food to give that a go (lightly pan fried, and then tossed in a gooey before sriracha-soy-peanut-butter-lime-brown-sugar sauce) and get back to me. I could eat it every night and never get tired of it.

This is something I've actually been meaning to try and forgot about

Let me help!

  • 1 block tempeh, sliced down the middle long ways, and then clicked into little rectangle slices. Pan fry in a little oil of you choice.

Combine for sauce (put in a bowl and toss the tempeh in it after - cooked peanut butter isn't great, imo):

  • 1 part soy sauce or tamari
  • 1 part lime juice
  • 1 part sriracha
  • 1 part brown sugar
  • 2 parts peanut butter

Get back to me. This is one of my absolute favorites!

Thanks I'll have to find time for shopping now. I only wish I could count on people to not angle grind off my bike lock while I'm in the store.

One year later (looking through my comments) - how did it go?

I was about to say, when making bread salt is like the only flavouring so they recommend not being too stingy. I do love tofu though. The texture is neutral and can be "improved" depending on the goal. The taste is pretty bland and it will taste like whatever you want it to be.

My gripe with tofu is that it always sticks to the pan.

I've tried pressing the liquid out, freezing, and flouring/cornstarching it and that works to an extent but it's more effort than I'd like for something that is basically sauce flavoured.

Tofu is a pain. Try heating the pan significantly before adding oil, and then toss the food in on top of the oil shortly after.

Alternatively, scallions in oil help to make a non stick coating. Or a lecithin-containing spray oil. The lecithin helps prevent sticking way more than the oil itself does.

Or tell your pan to shut up, and either deep fry or air fry it.

everyone tried only the shittiest alt-malks

well i dont have 5 euro to dish out on a carton of altmilk every time i want to make an omelette

yall have an excess of money and it shows

More like gurgling stomach pain. That said in most cooking I generally just use cow milk and hope it goes better than drinking it straight. Most of them, even if they claim to be a 1:1 replacement can't serve the same purpose in a lot of recipes. One time I was doing a midnight pantry raid and made Mac and white cheese with iirc almond milk. It became almost identical to white chocolate melted over noodles.

Hahaha, white people can't cook, amirite?

I had this fantastic plant-based milk product on my store shelves called "Not Milk". I really enjoyed it. Had this mild coconut flavor which might turn off some (not me) but anyway, it's gone now because it was too expensive for the market I'm in.

Meanwhile gallons of milk flow for the same purpose, only subsidized for under half the cost per ounce.

As we do, we stifle innovation ourselves based on our past.

check out your local Aldi. They've got a range of almond, soy, coconut and oat milk at very reasonable prices. I was loving coconut milk until my friend told me how high in saturated fat it is (like really high.) Since then I do about half coconut and half light almond for my oatmeal and I can't say enough how good it tastes. I'm eating oatmeal as a dessert now sometimes because I like it so much.

Edit: had originally said cholesterol but totally had meant saturated fat. Thanks to DarthFrodo for bringing the error to my attention.

Permanently Deleted

we need to mandate water efficient farming pratices

Less than regular milk so if you're divided between almond and cow milk, to for almond.

Plants don't produce cholesterol, only animals. Coconut oil is high in saturated fat that seems to be bad for blood cholesterol levels, but coconut milk (for drinking, in cartons) has hardly any fat in it. The one I looked up has half of the saturated fat compared to 3,5% fat cows milk.

Thanks for the correction, I totally meant saturated fat but my brain shit the bed. I'll correct my post and note the edit. Thanks again!

Extra thick oatmilk is the way to go.

Check to see if your store has "Nextmilk" made by Silk. It is cheaper than "Not Milk" and tastes better!

Butter and heavy cream don't really have a good replacement, but regular milk has so many alternatives it's crazy. Almond milk and oat milk I prefer to regular old milk.

Because lots of people in your country drink it, like it, and even more eat things made from it. Like cheese.

"Two thirds of people can't tolerate lactose" is utterly fucking meaningless in this context. Most of those are in Asia. Last I checked, it was countries giving out subsidies, not some nebulous world council.

And nearly all farming gets subsidised, because that reduces reliance on external countries. You've seen what capitalism did to housing. You don't want that to happen to food.

My takeaway from this is that Nestle probably doesn't own any dairy companies, but probably does own a plant that makes oat milk. They keep all the profit in their own ecosystem by buying their supplies from themself and then get to tell us how green and thoughtful they are.

I prefer plant-based milk over dairy, it tastes better and it lasts longer. I tried plant based milk years ago and never went back. I've tried cashew, macadamia, rice, soy, almond, coconut, oat, and sunflower. Some of my favorites are vanilla almond, dark chocolate almond and cashew, vanilla macadamia, and vanilla coconut. My family still buys dairy milk, but we always bought plant-based butter. I buy cream cheese to use as bread spread.

Are there actual studies showing that plant-based alternatives are better for health (for individuals that digest lactose just fine like me) ?

I switched to alt-milks for ecological reason but media keep talking about the negative health effects of «ultra-transformed food», which alt-milk very much sounds like...

Because most plant juice tastes like shit and has the wrong mouth-feel for most things we use cow milk for. Its not rocket surgery.

I'm not vegan or even vegetarian, so I feel pretty impartial on this. My partner uses oat milk for their coffee, and over the years I just got used to using it straight, or in cereals, etc. Now I greatly prefer it. It's just "milk" for me now.

Never thought it would happen, but getting cow milk when I'm out feels off - that mouth-feel you mention; just doesn't sit right anymore. It really is an acquired taste.

Right there with you. I've been living the plant milk life for years at this point and cow milk just tastes so... water-y for lack of a better explanation.

Have you considered heavy cream? /s

My wife says she can "taste the cow" in the milk, in the same way she could "taste the goat" in goat milk before moving to plant based milks.

I know exactly what she means though, it's a weird aftertaste that tastes 'wild' in the same way you can differentiate wild game from beef or pork.

However, it seems only people who have been off cow milk for a while can identify this element.

Yeah! That's the perfect way to put it, thank you. It's like a foreign extra flavour - a certain cowiness that I didn't notice growing up. Cow milk used to taste like "default milk," where everything else was a variation on that normal base. But now it's one of the "other" milks, because I taste it so infrequently.

Spot on. People are out here trying to play like almond, oat, soy and every other milk substitute is exactly the same as dairy based milk, it's not and will not ever be, they're different products

Also pretending that people swapping from dairy to alternate milks will somehow impact the looming climate crisis is also pretty disingenuous

If we all went vegan we'd reduce food based emissions by 70%, which is 15% of the entire planets GHG emissions. Not to mention recovering 75% of farm land.

It really is a no brainer if you want to make a difference. And if I, "a rural New Zealander who grew up on a dairy farm who said he'd never eat a vegetarian meal in his life" can convert to veganism based on the logic of it, surely anyone could.

there is no reason to think farmland would be "recovered" or converted to any less- environmentally destructive use.

Ready for another reply where I used /u/commie's clever abilities to reply to an argument? Prepare yourself for an amazing analytical response!

"I disagree"

this is poisoning the well

If we all went vegan we'd reduce food based emissions by 70

I doubt it.

Why? Because all the animal herders will still produce lots of meat at a loss and then just burn everything no one wants to eat?

i don't believe the methodology used to calculate emissions from animal agriculture is appropriate: every examination i've done has attributed emissions to animals that are actually conservation, like feeding cattle cottonseed and then attributing the impacts of cotton grown for textiles to cattle.

But then you doubt the number and not the general effect of reducing carbon emissions by switching to a plant-based diet, right? Because it is pretty obvious, that growing plants and then feeding those plants to animals is way more inefficient than eating the plants without extra steps.

a lot of what is fed to animals are parts of plants that people can't or won't eat. there may be some reduction but i don't believe it can be anywhere near 70%

Do you have any sources on hand? It's hard to google for this stuff without running into sites by PETA etc, which are too biased for my taste.

i don't know of any broad surveys across crop categories but i'm pretty familiar with soy

https://ourworldindata.org/soy

you can see that 17% of all soybeans becomes oil. but a soybean is only about 20% oil altogether. in order to extract that much oil, we must press about 85% of the global crop of soybeans. the vast majority if the soy fed to livestock is the industrial waste from that process. you can see in that chart it's called "soy cake" or "soy meal".

elsewhere in this thread i mentioned cottonseed.

But then humans can also eat that soy meal to get their proteins. It's pretty tasty, I eat it regularly.

people do eat soy meal but they eat very little of the amount produced. if the vast majority of it weren't fed to livestock it would just be waste.

We are talking about a switch to a predominantly vegan diet. People need to get the protein they got from meat from somewhere else.

i think that's a hard sell for most people and i frankly just don't see it happening. do you have a plan to make that happen?

Well, if the first step happens (people going vegan), then other protein sources will be automatically in demand. A huge chunk of protein powder nowadays is whey, that can be easily substituted by soy, because of the sufficient amino acid profile of soy.

if the first step happens (people going vegan)

this is what I'm looking for a plan to accomplish.

in order to extract that much oil, we must press about 85% of the global crop of soybeans. the vast majority if the soy fed to livestock is the industrial waste from that process.

I've already told you that we can produce plant-based meat or soy protein for other uses from that, which you conceded, and you still call it "industrial waste". Why are you knowingly spreading misinformation?

not only can we do that: we DO that. but there frankly isn't enough human use for that, so it would be wasted if we didn't feed it to animals.

If the rest of the plant would be wasted, it would be more economical to just grow another plant that's more efficient for oil production (canola, sunflower), not soybeans which are incidentally the crop highest in protein.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/area-per-tonne-oil

It's not grown in such quantities because it's essential but simply because there's demand for the extra protein from factory farms right now.

soybeans are grown for nutrient fixation in rotation with corn. they're more of a soil crop than an oil crop.

Among the cereals, the most prominent as a source of energy is corn. Between 70% and 80% of its production is used as a feed ingredient worldwide.

https://www.veterinariadigital.com/en/articulos/importance-of-corn-in-animal-production/

"We need animal agriculture because we need to grow the feed plants to grow more feed plants for animal agriculture"

We've come full circle.

“We need animal agriculture because we need to grow the feed plants to grow more feed plants for animal agriculture”

this phrase never appears in your source or anywhere else in this thread. what are you quoting?

It's your argument put in another way

soybeans are grown for nutrient fixation in rotation with corn. they're more of a soil crop than an oil crop.

no, it's a strawman of my argument.

Among the cereals, the most prominent as a source of energy is corn. Between 70% and 80% of its production is used as a feed ingredient worldwide.

this can be true while, at the same time, soybean oil's byproduct is soy meal that would be wasted if it weren't fed to animals.

I've already addressed that argument above.

saying "i've already addressed it" is a rhetorical trick to avoid admitting it's true.

if you don't know what crop rotation is, you don't belong in any discussion about agriculture.

Why are you knowingly spreading misinformation?

i am doing no such thing. i'm simply pointing out your lies.

I'm going to use your sound logical deductions and reasoning skills to reply to your comment in kind, ready?

I doubt it

Yeah? Well I doubt THAT.

you can doubt whether i doubt something but i am the authority on whether i doubt something so self-reporting my doubt is the strongest evidence that can be gathered in support of the claim.

a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. i've presented exactly as much evedince as the claim to which i was responding.

If you see how much crops we need to grow and fresh water we need to feed a cow, you'd see how inefficient meat is.

70% of all the crops we grow is to feed our livestock.

Meaning for 1/3 on our plate, we use more than double the resources than the other 2/3 combined.

70% of all the crops we grow is to feed our livestock.

that's a lie

Do we really need to recover farmland, though? At least in the US, we have way more than enough to go around. And there's like 19 people in New Zealand, y'all don't need the space. :P

Or look at the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. That all done to produce more farmland. So, if we were using or land more efficiently we wouldn't be carving up the "lungs of the world"

Yeah our rivers in NZ got so polluted with cow effluence and runoff the waters became legally unswimmable. Then the right wing government changed what is legally define as "polluted" so people could swim again.

Farm land (in particular farm land unsuitable for crops) can be used to plant forests, further reducing climate change. If the boomer generation lost 6-10 IQ points on average for leaded petrol, ours will see that again from high PPM CO2 rates.

If this hits market, I'll be all for it.

Calm down Chidi...

How did the man not die from starvation?

You have to grow the feed for cows, give them water, and cows emit significant greenhouse gasses.

Almond trees use way less water and actively reduce CO2 during growth.

Well, dairy takes more.

Seems like it is because the answer isn't what you said.

When you say "It's not rocket science/surgery" it implies that what you're saying is an evidence, in this case their answer is false, it's not subsidized because it tastes better or people enjoy it more, it's purely political.

I don't see why dairy should be subsidized but some plant milks aren't exactly environmentally friendly either. The best can be said is they're better than dairy, assuming the same land could be used for both. But they can be devastating in their own right. E.g. to grow 1 almond (i.e. one kernel) takes over 3 gallons of water. Other crops used to make milk like oats have lower water consumption.

I see soy/oat/rice milk as their own thing, instead of a direct cow milk substitute/replacement.

There are many, many dairy product that are important as food or ingredients to other foods such as butter, yogurt, ice cream, cream, infant formula, and various cheeses that cannot be replaced directly by plant based alternatives.

And also, if you don't like milk, try getting one of those unhomoginized milk in glass bottles that's usually directly bottled by local farms. You have to shake a lot to get the cream on top dissolved again, but there is nothing that's quite like an ice cold cup of that.

Like an estimated two-thirds of the world’s population, I don’t digest lactose well, which makes the occasional latte an especially pricey proposition.

Bring that complain to the producers of "oat milk" and similar products. Producing a gallon of oat milk has ingredience costs of about 20ct. You know what you are paying for it in the supermarket. Go figure who gets rich on people who are looking for "alternatives".

A lot of arguments see to be that it tastes better. I don’t want to argue subjective tastes. However, in terms of economics, the better taste would mean that there is no need to subsidize it. The market would bear the additional cost if the taste and utility of milk is there. The question posed is still relevant: why do we subsidize it? Everyone arguing how much better it is than the alternatives are just proving the point that we shouldn’t be subsidizing it.

This is too narrow. Why do we subsidize food at all? America is supposed to be free market capitalists, right? Subsidies don't fit that definition?

(in reality, farmers need some sort of support system, I believe, as do we all, but subsidies don't fit the free market capitalism narrative.)

Because cows eat corn and cornfields have more power than people in America

So what you're saying is we need to make cornmilk.

We do, it's called whiskey.

Milk, cream, cheese (most of what milk ends up as), and butter, are all delicious, despite the corrupting economic and political arrangements. Is the quantity consumed appropriate? The US diet is demanding.

The article sort of glosses over the input required to grow plant-based milk products effectively at scale, and the fact they don't constantly produce like cows, the ways the crops can be destroyed and what's required to protect them. A byproduct of dairy farming is manure, often used to fertilize vegetable crops, but the nitrogen fixation used in synthetic fertilizers requires a lot of energy input as well.

Like an estimated two-thirds of the world’s population, I don’t digest lactose well,

That number, like all world population numbers is heavily skewed by just how many people are in China. The mutation that causes adults to continue to produce the enzyme to digest lactose is less common among those of Asian descent.

(Globally, alt-milks aren’t new on the scene—coconut milk is even mentioned in the Sanskrit epic Mahābhārata, which is thousands of years old.)

...and there are medieval European recipes that call for almond milk, and tofu is made from soy milk and there are written sources referencing it roughly a thousand years old. You're right, none of these are really new on the scene, aside from maybe oat milk.

A 2021 report by industry analysts Mintec Limited and Frost Procurement Adventurer also notes that, while the inputs for dairy (such as cattle feed) for dairy are a little more expensive than typical plant-milk ingredients, plant alternatives face higher manufacturing costs.

I feel like your first paragraph completely ignored this aspect. You squeeze milk out of a cow. Nut and bean milks require grinding the stuff up with a lot of water, mixing it thoroughly, then squeezing the wet pulp through a fine filter (for small batches something like a cheesecloth) to separate the milk from the pulp.

Commercial oat milk requires further processing, because just pulping, mixing with water and straining oats does not produce anything appetizing at all.

In the United States, meanwhile, it’s a waiting game to see whether the government or corporations drive down alt-milk costs. Currently, Sumner says, plant-based milk producers operate under an assumption that “price isn’t the main thing” for their buyers—as long as enough privileged consumers will pay up, alt-milk can fill a premium niche. But it’s going to take a bigger market than that to make real progress in curbing emissions from food.

That's not a bad assumption on their part - people who are deeply concerned with the emissions involved in producing their food tend to be richer, in no small part because poor folks are going to put price first, because they have to think about how food fits into their budget more.

Also cheese - you can't make cheese from plant milks. Well, you can try, but that's basically how you make tofu, and performing a similar process on other plant milks creates something closer to tofu than cheese.

I'm curious what makes milk bad for you. Could someone explain this? I understand why it is bad for the climate, but not why it's bad for human health provided you can digest lactose properly.

I'm allergic to milk, so fuck big dairy.

Because it's a relatively new competitor on the market that doesn't have the same agricultural base as dairy products which warrants subsidies aimed at keeping farmers from losing their shirts during lean seasons?

Oat milk > Almond milk. Almond milk has a weird and bitter taste to it, oat milk doesn't.

I also like the coconut water with rice drinks, but they hardly classify as milk even tho some brands may claim it's a milk alternative.

We all just say "capitalism" and end the thread right?

We don't need non human milk in the first place so I don't need a milk alternative either lol

Also, for the record I'm mostly off human milk too now that I'm an adult

side question, what is the impact of goat milk?

What's more local, whatever is more local is likely better for the planet unless that UK oat milk in that Toronto Coffee shop flew there on its own.

Even with transportation costs across the ocean, animal agriculture has insane emissions. I doubt that would even come close to animal ag

I can't make milk kefir with almond milk

Because milking nuts is hard. Their teats are so small!

As for the answer to the question....

https://invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=yKf40CLF9MU

We get most of our protein from sources other than milk. Humans are the only animal that continues to drink milk past weaning and the only animal that drinks milk from another animal and only a minority does it...

So... how does the majority of humans survive without drinking milk?

Humans are the only animal that continues to drink milk past weaning and the only animal that drinks milk from another animal

objectively false

Just because you were breast-fed until past middle school, doesn't mean it's true for the rest of us.

every predator which preys on mammals will eat the mammaries of lactating prey. why wouldn't they?! it's packed full of nutrients.

I guess that the soy yogurt I had for breakfast and the vegan mozzarella that I had on my lasagna for dinner last night were all just in my imagination.

Not everyone is able to handle soy, there is no solution for every person.

As an avid consumer of yogurt, what you consumed isn't yogurt.

More people are intolerant of dairy than soy...

You know that’s one of those really neat things about the world we live in.

Roughly about 65% of the world has lactose malabsorption. However the United States has one of the highest concentrations of people who aren’t lactose intolerant, with only roughly 35% of the population having lactose malabsorption.

Has to do with the genetic mutation that allowed people to drink milk much longer was in most of the ancestors who founded the US and those who came to the US eventually got the gene in some fashion mixed into their DNA.

So that’s resulted in the US being this hyper concentration of people who can drink milk that’s not really found anywhere else. Russia, some European countries, and some related African nations that were once occupied by those European nations have less lactose intolerant folks as well, but not as low as the US has.

The various parts of DNA code are thought to have developed in Europe but the US served to combine a lot of it and cheap milk from way back helped ensure that the hit of protein helped direct evolutionary processes to heavily favor that combination that allowed for longer ability to drink milk.

So that’s resulted in the US being this hyper concentration of people who can drink milk that’s not really found anywhere else.

I get what you're talking about but AFAIK lactose intolerance isn't common in the middle east.

what you consumed isn't yogurt.

Considering yogurt was just a made up word at some point, I have no problem with words evolving over time like literally every other word in our language.

Yogurt is about the end-product. It's like calling only some things bread because they have extra ingredients or don't use the same grains that ancient societies used to make the original bread.

Not being able to handle soy?

Is baked chicken too spicy for you? Hahahaha 😂😂

I bet you can’t even throw a baseball, dude just puts it on the ground and walks home to his couch.

There's soy allergy, with a prevalence of about 0,3%. Lactose intolerance is at 5%-90%, depending on the region.

you don't need breast milk for yoghurt and cheese.

I make both myself, my soy yoghurt tastes very similar to Greek yoghurt and works very well in curries etc. It's not just the flavour, it's fermented.

My blue and white cheeses are awesome, I serve them to people who thank me for buying them "real" cheese (something I would never do lmao). Again they're properly cultured, you just need to mix protein and fat sources in similar ratios to the target cheese. you can even use peas as the base for surprisingly tasty but weirdly green cheese.

Can you recommend any resources for the yoghurt and cheese that you make yourself?

So the yoghurt just start by making your own soy milk. Any old recipe will do, store bought is generally too low protein to set. You can set it with gelling agents lile tapioca starch but I'm not really into cooking that way personally.

So make your milk, add a yoghurt culture (unfortunately starting one it's unlikely you'll be able to find vegan culture. I just started with the dregs of a neighbour's Greek yoghurt. Probs gonna be excommunicated for that. Whatever you do keep a separe culture healthy so you don't have to buy more), pop it somewhere warm (low temp oven, ~30 degrees iirc), leave it for 12 hours.

Your first results will be all over the shop, you'll need to find an amount of water for the soybeans you get that doesn't basically just make silken tofu. That'll depend on specifically how mature they are etc so you'll have to experiment with your local source. It'll taste very tofu-y till you add salt (since it basically is sour tofu). Enjoy!

Cheeses umm: cashewbert is an EU store with vegan cultures, no ethical quandary there. This lady is a good place to start https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxMAl_LiSUU

Umm if using coconut oil use the descented stuff. soap makers often have food safe descented for sale. Otherwise it'll taste like coconut. I prefer macadamia oil.

for new styles start by looking at protein and fat ratios for the animal milk version and copying them. I hate to plug reddit but the vegan cheese making sub there is great.

As with all ferments cleanliness! cleanliness! cleanliness!

Dairy milk is gross. I stopped drinking it nearly 15 years ago. I wasn't vegan or vegetarian at the time. It just tasted awful. I still would eat cheese than, but as a drink, dairy milk is plain awful. It's also terribly inefficient. It's not shelf stable. It has a short lifespan. It requires a lot of water and energy per cup than many others.

Do plant-based milks taste exactly like milk? No. But they don't have to.

And how is it better for us? Considering a majority of the world can't digest it is a big sign as to why plant based is better. Soy isn't the only option. There's almond, pea, banana, cashew and coconut to name a few.

It’s not shelf stable. It has a short lifespan.

Ultra-pasteurized milk has a remarkable shelf life, even when unrefrigerated.

And how is it better for us? Considering a majority of the world can’t digest it is a big sign as to why plant based is better.

Your argument becomes a non-sequitur when extended to people who are lactose tolerant. The mere existence or ubiquity of lactose intolerance does not entail that milk is bad for the lactose tolerant. Perhaps plant substitutes to cow milk are better for even the lactose tolerant, but lactose intolerance is completely irrelevant to the minority of us such as myself who produce sufficient enzymes to digest lactose without any difficulty whatsoever.

Sorry, didn't realize the world revolves around the extreme minority when discussing what's good for the human race as a whole.

You're right. How could anyone ever make any argument against anecdotal case by case stories. Obviously the entire collected data on human nutrition is useless as a whole because it doesn't apply to small percentages of the population. Oh silly me and not understanding that general concepts aren't important.

Dairy milk is gross.
as a drink, dairy milk is plain awful.

I mean, you have to realize that this is strictly subjective, no? One could just as easily say that oat milk is gross and plain awful. I'd disagree - I think it's great - but "it's icky" is not a useful argument, speaking as someone who mostly buys oat milk nowadays.

So is saying "It's subsidized because it tastes better!" which is the argument people on here are using instead of the real reason which is politics.

I mean take it in context to who I replied to.

Subsidies have devalued food and the value of farms and farm labor. If they went away, meat and dairy consumption would fall simply because we would have to pay the true dollar value of producing those foods.

I don't agree with the environmental assessment in this article though. The quantity produced might be the same, but a cup of cow milk has a lot more calories and micronutrients than plant milk. Sure, many people don't have the genetics to digest it, but there's a reason mammals drink milk until they can eat other foods. They wouldn't survive long sipping puddles of soy water.

Given how inflammatory dairy is, and all the many links it has to so many health problems, I have no idea how it can still be pitched as a health food, but then, old habits die very hard in this country. Seeing how people treat "protein" as a health food is nearly as absurd. SMH.

ITT people who dont like milk or allergic to it are complaining about milk, just like vegan bitching about meat eaters.

This is a weird advertisement. Drink water. Plant milk does not have the protein or calorie density as dairy milk. You may as well drink water and eat your greens instead of supporting industries that are gentle rapists of the earth. I'll drink my own vomit before reading that rag again.

i switched to milk from local cows that are happy and grass fed... and damn does it taste better. like measurably better, in everything i use it for. grocery store milk now tastes strange to me. it's more expensive, but who really needs to use that much milk? i don't drink it casually, just in baking, etc.

non dairy milks are a scam to sell water to rich city people.

Cuz mhn milk gud

Plant milk also tastes absolutely disgusting in my opinion and comes nowhere near to actual milk from a cow. The moment when I can't taste the difference is the point where I'll switch over, but so far nothing has impressed me.

Cos fake milk tastes like shit

Good question. For some dumb reason, we keep telling kids to drink milk, too, as well as try to get them to drink it in schools, when we should be doing anything BUT that. We should be telling them to cut dairy to as close to zero as possible.

It's still part of the food pyramid is it not? WTAF.

I would actually agree with this plant milk thing if it wasn't even of a worse alternative to cow milk and with so much sugar and chemicals as a can of Pepsi:

https://youtu.be/oLjEG8Qu1Qw?feature=shared

Sorry but plant milk is a processed food with no nutritional value. It is not better for us or the planet. This is just a silly article.

Because the fiction that plant-based products are healthy has been heavily debunked by just how sickly vegans are on average?

Milk is seen as a waste product in the meat industry.

Yeah, the climate would be better if we lowered our meat intake and switched to plant milk.

But unless that first one changes, it is more effective drinking the waste than it is setting up entire fields to create a new product.

i dont really like anything but whole cows milk. skim is just basically water and i would rather drink water than watery milk. but i havent had milk for a long time. i just eat cheese all the time. i will never give up cheese. yummy

Can't make a bechamel with plant based. Doesn't have to be cow, but can't be nut or oat or whatever.

Wat? Sure you can

It it doesn't come from a mammal it ain't milk.

Doesn't taste as good to many meat eaters.

They simply haven't tried enough. A good oat milk is better than cow's milk 100% of the time, and I'm not vegan or anything.

What's a good oat milk? We thought my daughter had food allergies, so we tried all kinds of different brands and plant bases. They all tasted like incredibly lightly flavored water.

I really like Califia Farms barista blend oatmilk or their oatmilk creamer. The blend one is perfect for coffee and tea, just slightlybetter than the creamer. I'm in the US, so not sure how easy to get outside of here.

I've been on a Chobani kick lately. I like the original fine for my coffee, but the extra creamy may help you with adjusting to the flavor. Avoid Planet Oat like the plague. It's everywhere, and way closer to "lightly flavored water" than the others I've tried.

Because it tastes like shit. And I don't even drink milk but you can't even cook with the substitute shit.

Oatmilk creamer in coffee or chai, however, is delicious. Some brands are better tasting than others.

Yeah, but store bought is expensive AF. Oatmilk is one of the easiest milks to make at home. Literally get rolled oats, blend them lightly with a blender along with water and strain out the fibre. That's it... That's oat milk for you!

Have you actually tried to do this? I did, and it was pretty disappointing.

Yes I did. I loved it quite a lot actually! It weirdly had an absolutely wonderful fragrance to it.

Did you try your homemade oatmilk in coffee?

In tea specifically

Oatmilk is pretty close to the real thing without being an all out substitute. I use it for day to day stuff and if I have a recipe that requires milk I buy a small amount versus a whole gallon. Most do just taste like nut juice though.

It’s also 1000x better for the environment. I don’t give a fuck if my brand tastes 87% like milk at that point. I still and will use creams for cooking, but milk and cereal is such a weird industry now that it’s all really expensive.

I don't believe you have used the correct plant milks for the correct uses.

  1. Soya Milk: Kinda meh taste for hot and cold beverages. U won't go wrong with it. However, this ain't the best product for all uses. U can make tofu tho, which is nice.
  2. Oat milk: The best choice for cold beverages. Oat milk has a flavor that is just much better than soy milk in my opinion. While u can use it for hot beverages (and it's delicious there), u need to be kinda careful. The more u heat up oat milk, the thicker it becomes due to the starch present in it. Therefore, never try to boil, or come close to boiling oat milk ever.
  3. Coconut milk: If u have anything to say about coconut milk, gtfo from here. It's fatty and can be a substitute for cream. Needless to say, it is absolutely delicious! South Indian curries make use of this. There's also a drink that I love called "Solkadhi", which is an Indian drink made using coconut milk. U just can't talk smack abt it....
  4. Chickpea milk: Now this is a use case which I don't know if many people would agree with me out on or no. What I do is, I make chickpea milk to make youghurt out of it (just ferment it using soaking water). Now, in my experience, this yogurt tastes like shit if u consume it alone. HOWEVER, if you use it in curries, gohdddd r u in for the treat of ur lifetime! One, u get a beautiful thick curry and two, u get that amazing acidic flavor. It's just rlly rlly good! Highly recommend if u guys haven't tried this out yet.
  5. Other plant milks: There are a gazillion other plant milks. I just mentioned the ones above that I have personal experience with.

In conclusion, try not to fixate on one plant milk alternative and then attempt to use it for all use cases of dairy milk. Remember, there is no monolithic "dairy milk alternative". Different plant milks serve different purposes. If used correctly, u'll get the best culinary experience of ur life!

Or, you know, I could just use milk.

Well sure... The reason why I don't use dairy milk is because:

  1. lactose intolerance
  2. plant based milk is much better for the environment
  3. DIY plant based milk is cheap af
  4. Ethical concerns with the animal husbandry industry

Because things that aren't milk taste like flavored water, and not...you know...milk...

I hate to break this simple truth to you, but that's the whole reason why. Milk simply tastes better, and is a superior product to alt-milk.

I agree with you, but that doesn't mean we should be subsidizing its production. If we're gonna do that I say we also pay car makers to start making fun hatchbacks again because I prefer them.

superior product

In what way?

The milk solids weaken the connections between the gluten proteins to create a softer bread. It's also what is responsible for the browning that is characteristic of bread. It also helps activate other leaveners and is what helps keep bread moist. So...a little bit more than that.

And that's just bread... do I need to go further?

i don't drink other "milks" but i do drink soylent and, to my pallet, it's a perfect milk substitute. and, in a lot of ways, it's better nutritionally: every 400kcal delivers 20% of the RDA for 28 essential nutrients, and a (reasonable) blend of carbs, fat, and protein.

WTF are you linking? A 1x1 pixel image is pretty sus.

Guess I uploaded it badly. It's a Big Lebowski gif of the line, "well, that's just like, your opinion, man"

Edit your comment to be in this format: [text describing the image](url of image)

ty. I was quite tired when I originally commented and just mixed up which field to put the url into.

It's a bug. Whether it's Kbin, lemmy, or what, I don't know. But it's not rendering properly on Kbin at the very least.

You're getting downvoted but you're right. I think some people just like their milk to taste like coconut or something.

They're not getting downvotes for saying they don't taste the same. They're getting downvoted for speaking an entirely subjective opinion as some hard truth.

It's more that liking a product isn't a good reason to subsidize it's production.

It is a hard truth. If it wasn't a hard truth, it wouldn't be the way it is.

No, the reason why it's subsidized is politics, not people's enjoyment of the product.

Mind explaining to me the political reasons it's subsidized? I want these reasons to not be tied to peoples enjoyment of the product at all, mind you...

Because it supports middle rural America and that's where conservative strongholds are.

I've never heard any politician say the subsidies exist because people like it. It's always in support of jobs, etc. Are you daft? Point to one politician or lobbyist claiming subsidies are needed because folks like the flavor.

And even for non conservatives, cutting farmers' income and making them stop producing (even if they produce too much) is a big no no, no matter your political alignment.

...or that they love all the bad health outcomes from drinking milk and consuming massive quantities of cheese.

Are you familiar with the term 'tautology'?

Sometimes you have to tell children twice before they get it through their thick skulls.

Due to freedom of selection, nowhere in the world has a alt-milk market which surpasses that of traditional milk. It's because people prefer traditional milk, and not plant-paste. I'm sorry that I'm having to repeat myself for you to understand, but hey - you can lead a horse to water, you can't make it drink.

If plant/alt milk were more popular, you'd see places where it supplanted traditional milk, but you don't see that literally anywhere in the world. So, it's a hard truth. One that...due to people's confirmation bias, they don't seem to be willing to accept.

There is freedom of selection, but it's not a free market. We're literally discussing that in this post. Milk is substantially cheaper due to subsidies. Many people can't afford to simply purchase the more expensive one when a cheaper version is available. However, in a free market, it wouldn't be that much cheaper.

New products take time to surpass old products. You have false advertising and bad information floating around as truth and people think milk needs to be had to be healthy. It was so heavily advertised to boomers through millennials and even some of gen z, that I'm not surprised many have fallen for the marketing like you so heavily did.

Do you have me confused with someone who has wronged you?

My only response so far was a (admittedly cheeky) reply to your comment about how your reasoning for something being a 'hard truth' is simply because it's the way is...a complete circle, your logic on that one.

You're getting dragged by others because you opened with an objective claim that milk tastes better, which is a subjective opinion. You're now pivoting to argue that cow milk is objectively better because it's more popular? Taylor Swift isn't the best musician because she's popular. Because "best" is incredibly complex. Best guitarist? Composer? Singer? What's best of any of those categories, anyway? We gotta ask Phaedrus, I suppose.

If you're trying to argue that cow milk is the "best": Cow milk is really good at getting protein and other minerals/vitamins to folks. Really good. It's got a lot of properties that make it really useful in some recipes I love. Also I eat a lot of dairy ice cream, and yogurt. I'm not some anti-milk crusader.

Dairy production, however, is really energy- and space-intensive compared to some alternatives. There's a tradeoff to be thought carefully about, and it deserves more than "cow milk is popular therefore it's the best". Unless you're just trying to say that cow milk is popular because cow milk is popular (which no one was arguing?). If that's the case, see my first reply. Circularity complete.

I'm not arguing cow milk is popular because cow milk is popular. I'm arguing that it's popular because it is subjectively better than the alternatives.

Kind of like how dogs are 4 legged animals, but not all 4 legged animals are dogs. Your argument to that is claiming circular reasoning, but it's clearly not.

Subsidies happen because they want to keep the prices low, because it's a popular food item. The majority have chosen it, so that makes it the market leader. They didn't choose it because it was a popular choice. And so inherently that makes it what it is. The defacto best option. Sometimes you have to paint with a broad brush when talking about broad topics.

Fact is, they lack a lot of the subjective properties that make milk as useful as it is. Milk is popular because it's the best. It's not the best because of its popularity. The popularity is simply an easy to understand byproduct of its superiority.

How about actually learning what circular reasoning is.

Cool, the nuance here I can get on board with. Thanks for expanding.

Cow milk tasting much better than alternatives (which I do very strongly agree with) is not exactly a good argument for dairy subsidies.

There are milks and additives that eliminate getting ill from milk if you're sensitive, you know. Don't need to create a wasteful fake milk industry just because you can't drink it normally.

The entire article is about how it’s less wasteful lol