The problem is, large parts of each country are supporting their government in what they're doing.

But again, in my opinion, if you don't know what you enjoy or what you're passionate about, just do stuff that vaguely interests you anyway. I'm sure you've had a passing thought of "that seems kinda interesting, but on second thought, naah". Just convert that "naah" into a "yea". Maybe it does really suck, but maybe you'll find something amazing for you to do. Once you actually do something and get involved with it, it may actually become more interesting than it seemed at the start.

In my humble opinion, ADHD meds aren't really amazing. They're there so we can survive in a world where we "need to get shit done", i.e. be productive for capitalism.

If theoretically you didn't have to work, would you really "need" the meds? What does it really matter if those tasks you're talking about take 2 weeks to do, if you have 2 weeks to spare?

In the end, what you're asking here is the age old human question of, what is the meaning of life? Because you're asking what to do with your time on Earth. And so naturally, no one can answer you. Meds or no meds, what you do with your time you have in this life is for you alone to figure out.

You mean the human race, right?

Again, I'm not saying it's a good thing. But the original person said they paid Google for getting GrapheneOS on their Pixel and thus they should get GrapheneOS, all of which I'm saying is that they did not pay Google for that and thus this specific argument is invalid.

But that's the thing, this only affects GrapheneOS, GrapheneOS was never even implied to be supported. The Pixel default OS still works perfectly well and is getting updates and everything.

The person said

paying money for something should get you the thing you paid for

what exactly did you pay for when you bought your phone is my question. The Pixel keeps working doesn't it? Did the purchase contract state that you get perpetual open source access to any further updates of the Android operating system?

I'm not saying that Google is doing anything good here. I'm just saying that the argument of "get the thing you paid for" is not applicable here. You paid for a phone, you got the phone. You can still put any software you want on it. You just don't get the newest development in an open source form, which was always just based on Google's goodwill and never part of any purchasing agreement.

Um, does the Pixel not work anymore? Did you pay for open source access of the device code?

Lol, as if a stock iPhone was any better than a stock Pixel?

Now you can look at actually better alternatives (privacy/whatever wise)

Relying on Google was always ridiculous. People thought they could have their cake (a device with cutting-edge hardware) and eat it too (not be spied on for ads to support this). It was always clear that Google will eventually fight against custom OS on their phones.