Cosplay creativity never ceases to amaze
6h 32m ago in lemmyshitpostHow dyou like them apples?
When Windows users find the Threadiverse
8h 19m ago in lemmyshitpost from media.piefed.worldThe threadiverse is not a Linux stall.
Scan your eyeballs, think of the children: how Britain sells surveillance as safety
12h 44m ago in unitedkingdom@feddit.uk from www.thenerve.newsI had read it, obviously, and had no idea what point you are trying to make.
Guess we'll never know!
I love getting contextless links to long articles. /s
Huh (2026-06-11)
23h 26m ago in programmer_humor@programming.dev from discuss.onlineHuh, doesn't render that way on my instance!
Huh (2026-06-11)
23h 26m ago in comicstrips from discuss.onlineIt's explaining why the bullshit is left. If you don't want to hear that, and instead just want to moan about how AI is not solving a problem that it literally cannot solve because it doesn't have any physical existence, then that's your choice, but it doesn't seem a productive use of time, like complaining that your dishwasher can't drive you to work. So yeah, I'm not going to talk about that, because it would be dumb.
AI hasn't taken away any of the good parts of my life. I do more art and writing than I did 5 years ago. I play the same amount of music. It has impacted my job but it's not yet clear how significant that will end up being.
Pride month
1d 9h ago in microblogmemes from slrpnk.netThis is a property of the distribution of light timings across a territory, and is still not something to do with red-light cameras.
If his home town used 3-second yellows without traffic cameras, without excessive enforcement, he’s going to roll through anyway
He's going to blow a red light? And you think that's a better situation than him not blowing it?
In my country I believe all traffic lights have approximately three seconds. It's enough; you need to have a good idea coming up to each light of when you're going to disregard the light, so that you've done your decision-making before it changes. Then, if it changes just before that point, you need to brake positively, not leisurely. Somehow, all learner drivers manage it.
If you view amber lights as "stop as long as able" rather than "continue if able" you wouldn't be in the embarrassing position of seemingly advocating purposefully blasting through red lights.
Do you have glaucoma? You should easily be able to see the light change when not looking directly at it. And once you're past your decision point, you don't even need it in your field of vision.
If you slam on the brakes at high speeds on a modern car, you will stop in much less than 2 seconds. In practice you need some time to react as well, but the time to react to an anticipated event is short and should be about a quarter of a second.
The "state of the LEDs" that you keep referring to is the signal that tells other drivers they may proceed. Stop minimising it.
Not relevant to this discussion. You can google to determine that such countries exist, if that's what worries you. Or just not believe me.
Nametags, for Nameless People [bill wurtz]
5d 8h ago in videos from www.youtube.comOfcom ex-chair: broadcasters embarrassed by GB News following ‘majority agenda’
15d 14h ago in uk_politics@feddit.uk from www.theguardian.comThe more things change
4mon 3h ago in trippinthroughtime@lemmy.ca from feddit.org






