if you look at the history of far right ideas, they have very strong syncretic inclinations. They unify their own concepts, even if they get contradictory salads in result (most fascist tendencies, conservatism and liberalism etc) and also they unify their strawmen of opposing concepts (judeobolshevism, all things LGBT). It's usually caused by lack of understanding of those concepts - and i believe by inability to count to 3 since they seems to have not much problem with 1, some with 2, but any more and the salads start.

Classification is not entirely clear, tanks are usually the armored tracked vehicles armed with cannons placed in turrets. For example of controversy look at Swedish Stridsvagn 103 which is usually called tank despite technically it is rather tank destroyer.

ISU-152 is usually classified as "assault cannon" since it's basically an armored mobile howitzer used to fire directly.

Note that "slaves would give you as much if not more surplus value than workers you have to pay" is one of the central problems here. They surely would give more surplus value in %, but in absolute values they would only do so in very primitive level of development, and even then not necessarily since even in antiquity slave labour was often considered inefficient.

Marx write more of this in Capital iirc.

Small lizards and so on don't need domesticating, since they are being usually held in terrariums. Fennec can be domesticated, it's not very easy though. Capybaras did went through domestication both historically and currently, just it was dependent on region and pigs are vastly better choice for livestock when compared.

Axlotl i think, some people do have them, iirc it needs some special conditions but except that it's like every similar creature.

No idea about frogs, lizards depending on species i guess. Capybaras are raised both as pets and livestock. Some people do have Fennecs as pets. Bats most likely no, or at least i never heard about them. Ravens yes, but since it's a big bird you would need to treat it more like hawk than like small parrot.

Sure

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/21/netanyahu-under-fire-for-palestinian-grand-mufti-holocaust-claim

https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-accused-of-absolving-hitler-for-holocaust/

And many more if you search for it, it was huge scandal back then. Of course not as huge apparently to end the career of bloodthirsty Hitler-absolving Israeli PM.

Netanyahu blamed holocaust on Palestinians and whitewashed Hitler, not very credible source i would say.

Nazis did the same, to the extent that at some point even fucking gestapo refused to process anonymous denounciations.

To be precise Palestine is like Donbas. Difference is that Palestine was genocided longer and more cruelly, and that Palestine don't have a poweful ally which would join the war to help them. Donbas did and lo and behold, most of western so called "left" hate them for that. They truly love every opressed people except those that fight back.

Excuse for not using marxist analysis. Or any other analysis tbh.

Paleolitic emotions - we have much older ones too. Also pure "hoooman natur" argument.

Medieval institutions - ones newer that medieval like NATO or IMF are way bigger problem than anything that could survive since medieval. Also even the worst ones of those, like catholic church or British monarchy are not anymore the same medieval ones, all were changed by time.

God-Like technology - excuse me what? God-like as in burning some bush on desert or god-like like in creation of universe? Insufferable hyperbole and also wholesale condemnation of technology is unmarxist. Finally, it's not tech that is the problem, it's capitalism.

If someone want to write a slogan this banal, at least make it correct.