Yea sure then it would be dumb? But this isnt really the case? A person who doesnt know that high voltages are dangerous shouldnt work on high voltages, also the ai output isnt even wrong in this case. If you thing that something valuable comes up with this search its already a problem a random site wwont display sspecifications for your device you should always look at the datasheet. Searching for "max voltage" instead of going to the manufacturers site and/or downloading the datasheet is not really the right aproach.

Its not like op searched "can i connect a 115v device to 230v" and ai giving the wrong awnser. There are many reasons and examples where the ai search is bad, this isnt one of them people dont need to invent cases for ai bad when there are enough real ones out there.

What's your agenda? Be honest. You got me, i only disagrer with you because i got paid by big llm, wtf is wrong with you?

Never ever did google point you to a specific page of a manual when searching for some value of said manual.

That's a fucking lie! You're lying.

Nop i am not. Manuals for measurement equiptment or electronic components are always long pdf docs with 50+ pages and never ever did google give you the pdf from a search. Best you could ever get was the overview site of the manufacturers that is still the first link after the sponsored links in the search at least for me. You never could google a random spec of something like this and get to a page of the manual. Only to something like the general overview. The rigol overview doesnt even display your input specs for your measuring inputs and specific information like the input levels the io of the external trigger are not stated there and like i said would always be in the docs. The datasheet is one of four documents for that device where the max input voltage of the trigger is shown. Then you have a programming manual a service manual and a user manual with many pages that google would have never "just" given you with your search term. Dont pretend that you could have googled that 10 years ago and got the pdf doc in your search.

My point still stands that this is not some ai error that kills someone because ai gave specs for the inputs. Is it not common knowledge that working with high voltages is a no go if you have no clue?

God someone saying that something isnt a ai problem but a problem of knowledge or workflow is a "ai fanboy" ? Never ever did google point you to a specific page of a manual when searching for some value of said manual. Why would you even search for the max voltage if you want a the product overview/spec sheet?

This just looks like you searched for a term where you knew the google ai will give some output so you can post here.

And no if someone didnt know what they are doing ai will not change that they shouldnt fiddle arpund with high voltages. Again the problem isnt that someone looks at ai the problem is doing stuff with high voltages when they dont have a clue. Look at homy many people die because they fiddle around with microwave transformers every yeat. Look at how many bad youtube shorts there are about building random circuits that are unsafe that has always been a problem and isnt sppecific to ai.

When did google search ever gave you random info of the manual? I hate ai as much as the next guy but this isnt an ai problem. Also you dont have to look at the manual, it says what the inputs can take right on the front of the device besides the bnc connectors.

But it doesnt matter if they use ai or web search if they dont understand the bare minimum about their equiptment. If you cant even look at the input rating that is written right besides the inputs on the device you are already fucked.

1. Why would you google that instead of looking at the datasheet or at the scope where it tells you what the inputs can take?
2. If you dont understand how oszilloscope inputs work, what impact frequency has on the inputs and when to use x1 or x10 probes dont operate it? Working with high voltages without knowing shit was always unsave ai wont change that no matter if its web search or ai, if you need to google that instead of looking at the datasheet you should not try to measure high voltages.

In germany the train schedule is so bad not even a cactus that needs a drop of water in a thousand years could rely on the deutsche bahn.

Is there already x86 silicon from china that is viable? I would hope this at least gives risc architectures a goodd boost, for industry the biggest problem seems to be decent documentation, in embedded stuff hardware on paper often looks good but lacking support can be a huge dealbreaker for developing firmware.

Alpha phoenix https://youtube.com/@alphaphoenixchannel

Has some cool experiments on his channel that explain it a bit more, dont watch the vertasium videos they are kinda bad and misleading in my opinion.

As a electrical egineer i would just pick up a physics/ee book and try to read it and build up a understanding from the simple dc calculations to dc and field theory. The simplistic models make working with real problems easy so you ddont have to use differential equations for everything and think about fields etc for sumple circuits etc.

People dont get the problem, with a plug in solar panel you can have something behind a fuse draw more current than what the fuse sees. If your panel provides 800w and you have other appliences in the same circuit behind the fuse that pull high current they can pull nearly the max of your fuse through the fuse and all the current of your solar panel which would be more than the wiring can tolerate without the fuse blowing. That doesnt take into account that that the wiring could not even be capable of handling max current of your fuse as others here pointed out with shitty wiring that has been done in old houses where at some point someone just changed a fuse without really updating the cables in the wall.

My grandpas house in france had so shitty wiring that i would have never trusted it to be safe. Flat cable with broken isolation and no protective earth and a horrendus subpanel.