Quality gate as a solution?
5d 9h ago in programming@programming.dev from jeferson.meYou complain about the ai essay style, and pointed to the language tool, I told you that I self host, so doesn’t include this part of it. (The ai bulshiting)
Either way, feels like you didn’t like my “writing” in a general sense… I imagined it was some deeper thought on it. Either way thanks for the reading.
Does it matter?
When shite is going to the fan, this is the price I want :)
Self hosted, doesn’t include the AI bulshiting.
Last week I was deeply in the mind of "I don't see the real benefit" of AI for a fair lot of things. But with the current change of hearts in a lot of companies, and with the fact that this tool won't leave us soon. I'm trying to mitigate the major issues on codebases that I'll work in the future.
So yeah, this is kind of the situation, and maybe this is the point that needs to be more explored on the conversation of the AI bullshiting.
Can you help me there. This writting style is mostly me (an non-native) writting. And a fair lot of languagetool fixing my grammar mistakes.
Maybe you can point some of the issues, maybe it's how I express myself, or something else. Also thanks for reading the text.
Firefox for Android adding Google Integrity checks
7d 23h ago in privacy@programming.dev from www.omgubuntu.co.ukI’ve the feels that Firefox only exists to avoid monopoly on chrome.
How to work alongside AI?
10d 13h ago in godot@lemmy.mlI can feel the FOMO, but what makes me afraid is: "What if this isn't FOMO?"
But to be honest, it's hard to see the real benefit in the tool when you look on all the "broken" parts along the way.
I'm not an expert in Game Dev, but I can see "good" code and "bad" code.
And yet, I can't see the meaningful benefit, I can see the cracks, it's never "fully" there, it's always a couple details that aren't correct in the planing, it's always something that bothers, or some misleading thing that looks "ok", but when you think little bit more it's not trully correct.
I know that on the empirical knowledge and testing I'm not seeing this benefit and speed.
But for some reason people are claiming that. And it feels like I'm left behind.
Even if the real number is a 10% speed boost, I want to know where and how to apply this to benefit from this tools. It's the same as the LSP, people can complain about it, and be like DHH that says that LSP aren't worth it. But on my own usage it's a good tool to add on my set of tooling.
Given the recent uproar about AI usage in rsync a PSA: maintainers owe you nothing
12d 14h ago in opensource@programming.dev from mikemcquaid.comSadly, unless you are on the viral side of the open source, all labour of love can and will be used in private for big corp gains, and this I think it’s unfair. But as the author of the text express, “fuck it” you did something expect nothing in return.
What are they seeing?
13d 12h ago in programming@programming.dev from jeferson.meUsing AI with Godot games, my practical view
13d 12h ago in godot@lemmy.ml from jeferson.meI can't see what this people are seeing
13d 12h ago in fuck_ai from jeferson.meLearning from a Prototype
19d 12h ago in programming@programming.dev from jeferson.meA devlog from a quick prototype
19d 12h ago in opensource@programming.dev from jeferson.meQuick devlog with some learning from a protoype
19d 12h ago in godot@programming.dev from jeferson.meMaybe LLM isn't the full problem?
1mon 3d ago in fuck_ai from jeferson.meA reflection of the usage of AI
1mon 17d ago in fuck_ai from jeferson.me

