I am somewhat shocked our government would do something like that, even last year.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/billboard-tariffs-canada-1.7496882

The headline here is incredibly misleading. The commissioner did not prevent discussion on Flock, but rather required Flock opponents to nominate a spokesperson to speak on their behalf.

While it might be normal practice to allow every individual to speak, I don't think this is a huge abuse of authority or anything.

This meme hits hard today.

Or, more enjoyably, from raspberries.

More like saying it's legal to publish the plans for a gun, but illegal for the layperson to build maybe?

Wouldn't the argument be that they aren't compelling speech, but preventing the execution of non-compliant code?

Sure, devs could publish software without age verification, but running it would be illegal.

Yep, that's the one!

Why does the article compare kilograms of food instead of equivalent calorie amounts?

The study provides data per 100g of protein, which seems like more useful comparison.

Such a good song.

What's the process for impeaching a US supreme court justice?