This is a demonstration, go to the public repo here. It is released under GPL3.0, so feel free to fork it!

I am 20, but yes I definitely am more closely aligned to the old down-to-earth movements, rather than modern keyboard warriors. Personally I've been a huge history nerd, and I like mostly old school grandiose aesthetics. But you are right, I'm not very good at PR as you can tell. The problem is that the team is too small, and there really isn't anyone better rn. However, I will keep it in mind, and look for people who can communicate better. Thank you for your suggestion!

1. To filter out the people who do not read beyond the name
2. Brother is brother. Sister is brother. All is brother
3. Sure

It's simply a project with a mission. Underneath it has different interlocking elements. The core of it lies in the Skill Graph, there's a web app we made for the building of them. You can create your own, build on top of someone else's graph, save it on the database and export it to keep local copies etc.

I admit that I could have been more explicit and comprehensive on the political issues, but it was already too long. But I think we agree on the overall premise. LLMs are a neutral weapon (as all weapons are) but the current landscape of corporatist acquisition of this quite powerful weaponry is a severe disadvantage to the disenfranchised, even at a (as you rightfully noted) geopolitical level, with the colonisation and exploitation of the global South. But my point was that, the only viable response to this, is to seize the weapons, not to flee the battlefield. The criticism of AI usage because its coopts the enemy, is as naive as "you hate capitalism, but still use things made in capitalism".

There you go, I wrote an extensive essay on AI usage like I promised. Post link

Noted!

You can view the code today as well, on the public repo where it is licensed under GPL 3.0, and will always remain open-sourced.

While I appreciate your opinion, we do NOT intend to follow on the corporate footsteps of showing professionalism with formal uniformity at the expense of personal expression. When a rocket scientist can be openly "furry", when a researcher can be pink-haired, we can not let ourselves be limited to tasteless formal names. The names are edgy because we are. The project is professional because we are. If those two things cannot coexist for you, then you, my friend, are stuck in the old world.