Or make it so that the AUR has a modicum of security and not allow brand new accounts to adopt orphaned packages and immediately push out malware without any form or reviews, checks, or interventions.

not only do you have to setup the infrastructure to host multiple repositories (deb, rpm), you also have to build and deploy multiple packages of sufficient quality that you don't break something else, which for a common/popular package would make the malware immediately noticeable.

All of the examples you just gave are not victimless crimes. Besriality is an abuse of power and at best coercion but more normally just straight up animal sexual abuse. Absence of consent is just rape, and children can't consent to sexual activity. Unless you dont consider animals, people, or children to be capable of being victims none of those are victimless.

Kinks are consensual, that is the difference.

This is a bit unnecessarily mean. OP made a post about themselves and how they react to a very personal and intimate act being "publicized". While OP might need therapy, they aren't shoving jack shit in anyones face. Instead you're going out of your way to say things that you think would make OP uncomfortable.

In bird culture that's considered a dick move.

and if everyone who asks that question has that mindset then we end up with no answers longterm.

its annoying to scroll through 15 threads asking the same thing looking for an answer, but its infinitely worse to find no threads related to what you're trying to do.

if you think that not paying attention to the road and a light at an intersection you're driving through at 47 km/h is normal then you need your license revoked. Missing a traffic signal once is missing a speed limit sign, its missing an exit, its accidentally parking on the wrong side of the road during street cleaning. It is not barreling through an intersection at full speed and not even braking until after you've already impacted something. This was not "one mistake" this was an intentional decision (distracted driving is not accodental) that has led to the death of a small child.

None of these abaolve the driver of the responsibility of operating heavy machinery. All of the things you said are teue; that does not chamge the fact the driver was frossly negligent. Just because the responsibility cannot solely be placed on the driver does not mean they should face zero consequences, repercussions, and not have to accept any responsibility for their actions.

yes there are systemic failing and corruption that needs to be addressed, and to go further the punitive system of justice is ineffective and should be replaced with more community oriented rehabilitative solutions.

that does not change the fact that gross negligence occurred and cost a father his child. even in a different framework with different transportation, such blatant and offensive negligence would still require the perpetrator to take accountability and face consequences for their actions that have resulted in a dead child. under the current system with the current legislative and transpotation frameworks this person recklessly endangered people to the most serious degree and is being let off scott free

he wasn't paying attention for twenty seconds. if it was yellow and he sped through it while it turned maybe that argument could hold some weight, but not paying attention to the road is gross negligence while operating heavy machinery.

It probably won't to my understanding. Most fossil fuels are from large organic material deposits (usually from plants) underwater or in low oxygen environments where they aren't disturbed/don't decompose. Basically the conditions for fossil fuels to be remade don't exist anymore so we really aren't getting any more