letsmakeafriendship

This is absolutely something that should have been done via legislation, not executive order.

And all that money being collected from gas companies in taxes/fees? Not being administered by the government, not accountable in any way, just being funneled all to a single non-profit: "Seeding Justice" , a "Portland-based nonprofit that deals in social, racial and environmental justice". Which I'm sure has no ties to Kotek, none at all. Estimated to be over $150M.

Their list of grants they have handed out looks like it's straight out of a Tucker Carlson monologue about crazy things "the woke marxist left" is doing. One of my favorite lines was a grant for "full-spectrum doula training specific to sex workers". Stuff like this is red meat for Oregon conservatives.

Two cities in Oregon have ended their contract with Flock thanks to citizen pressure.

5mon 4d ago in DeFlock@sh.itjust.works from lookouteugene-springfield.com

Has somebody looked up your license plate in Flock? Now you can find out

5mon 4d ago in DeFlock@sh.itjust.works from haveibeenflocked.com

Has somebody looked up your license plate in Flock? Now you can find out

5mon 4d ago in privacy@lemmy.ml from haveibeenflocked.com

Love to see America taking up this free speech fight again. EU has gotten out of control.

Video about interesting OSU study on hurricanes

5mon 10d ago in oregon from www.youtube.com

Portland’s gas-powered leaf blower ban goes into effect

5mon 12d ago in portland@lemmy.ml from www.oregonlive.com

On the one hand, this is some nanny state bullshit. On the other, fuck gas leafblowers I will hate that sound.

I enjoy a lot of PBS and NPR programs, but it is weird AF to me that people want the government to subsidize the media.

  1. The job of the media is to hold the government to account. They can't do that if they're funded by the government.
  2. If people appreciate this media, they can pay for it, like they already do with their tax dollars. I see no reason why people need to be taxed so we can have NPR.

I'll go first. I've been registered D for years, considering switching to R this cycle. Look at my post history if you doubt, sort by top.

Top issues for me are civil liberties, civil liberties, and economic policy (though this matters more for federal than state).

Considerations for switching to R are:

  • Dems have a history of abusing or ignoring their primary process (2016, 2024), makes participating in them feel pointless. Republicans actually let outsiders win their primary.
  • Republican primaries recently have a wider variety of viewpoints IMO. Republicans seem able to actually accomplish things when elected. More focus on civil liberties and economic policy, though with some obvious areas where it's the opposite (book bans, abortion, immigration).
  • I would love for the democratic party in Oregon to have a legitimate challenger instead of the nuttiest person MAGA can come up with. Sane-ish candidates get crushed in Republican primaries. A lack of competition is bad. Years of single-party rule has created stagnant, broken policies.
  • I am really mad that the dems reversed a ballot measure (M110).

The dem platform to me recently sounds a lot like:

  • More taxes for more incompetently managed government programs
  • Feel good policies that net neutral or make the situation worse (rent control etc)
  • Competitive victimhood and deciding which in-group wins this time
  • Complaining that they can't get anything done even when they have majorities in the legislature
  • Crime doesn't exist, you're being gaslit by republicans.
  • We don't really have a platform aside from being anti-trump
  • We'll give you healthcare (just kidding, vote harder next time so we can have a super-super-super majority and then we'll finally pass it)
  • We are afraid of technological progress and will hamper it with regulation whenever possible.
  • Fascism is coming! And also let us take your guns to keep you safe (I don't own guns but support people who do)

The republican platform to me sounds a lot like:

  • We've got lots of crazy ideas, some of them are actually decent. Our internal process is a warzone
  • When elected, we actually fight hard for those ideas
  • We acknowledge the budget is a problem. We are about free speech. Will we do anything about it? Probably not, but we acknowledge it, which is more than I can say for the D camp who never talk about the depreciation of our currency, who passed the TikTok ban, and who would love to throw you in jail for an offensive meme if legal.
  • Public spaces have been completely ceded to a crime and homelessness. We'll make it so you can actually go in parks again without feeling unsafe.
  • We will make it easy to build more housing.
  • We are optimistic about the future and technological progress, we will make sure room exists for experimentation.
  • We won't take your guns

Permanently Deleted

7mon 19d ago in eugene from www.registerguard.com

"What if instead of investigating actual crimes, which is what people are actually complaining about, we just arrest people for looking homeless?" - EPD and City Council, two of the laziest and most incompetent organizations you will ever interact with

I don't like Bentz but I'd rather have my rep actually going to work and voting on/drafting legislation than doing town halls. His rationale isn't unreasonable, town halls are mostly a space for people to show up and vent, elections are the only time that venting actually counts for anything.

Eugene Police Debuts Own Press

10mon 6d ago in oregon from doublesidedmedia.com

FIRE is one of the orgs that worked on this case, they are awesome and non-partisan defenders of free speech.

Well this is a straight up lie:

"Program had no funding and cost nothing other than ~4 hours of each program member’s time related to the program each month."

Those hours aren't free. They are hours that we as taxpayers pay for. That's 4 hours that could have gone to something else.

I like this decision, DEI initiatives have gone too far imo. We should be promoting people, hiring people, and allocating resources based on merit, not based on race or other factors. The law and our government system should be neutral to race, gender, etc. We can't make people's biases cease to exist through legislation, but the least we can do it make sure our actual laws and rules don't specifically privilege one group over another. It's wild that this is a controversial statement in today's age.

Eugene/Springfield Crime (2024)

1y 5mon ago in eugene

Very interesting thank you for posting!!