oce

I try to contribute to things getting better, with humor, sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let's discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.

hmmm

6h 50m ago in hmmm from jlai.lu

Maybe they have not solved the spelling problem yet.

It was on a clipboard I was given to fill some form, I am not sure what to think about those.

Wouldn't deaths from battlegrounds be too small (before world wars) to impact a group's genetics?

Can you guys remove the negative filter and consider not everyone wants to belittle you hurt you or take something from you?
Have you considered the question can come empathy, interest in solutions, basic curiosity?

In my experience, all traditional styles are welcoming, adapting to different and changing bodies is part of the philosophy.

Simply curiosity, no need to look for mean reasons.

Curious and showing my interest to op's story. But apparently this is interpreted negativily.

Congratulations!
Did you use the new drugs to lose so much?

Into the rabbit hole we go!

21h 18m ago in science_memes@mander.xyz from mander.xyz

A scientific model is valid within its limits of applicability. We will likely never be able to establish natural science models that escape this, even in physics.

It will not make a difference in how illegal and wrong it was, but having some verified numbers about the percentage of civilians casualties over combattants helps understand if it was mistakes/collateral damages of military targets, or something worse.

Asses cooked matcha langue de chat cookies

1d 18h ago in pics from jlai.lu

Pour quelles raisons le soja est-il devenu l'obsession des masculinistes ?

22d 5h ago in france@jlai.lu from www.franceinfo.fr