They've had enough seats to fix these problems plenty of times, but chose not to. They've had majorities twice that I can remember, and spent the entire time building out the systems that the current administration is using.

So once again I ask: How is it helping to have more seats?

How is it helping to have more seats?

Oh look, a Simp!

They can both be too old.

If you don't remember anyone saying that, it's because you weren't paying attention.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/briefing/kamala-harris-convention-speech.html

Hell, search posts here for "leftists don't vote", and you'll find a lot of simps explaining that it's "akshually smart of her" to keep moving to the right.

Both:

• bomb kids
• fight against the working class
• fight against healthcare for all
• give tax money to their rich friends
• fight against human rights
• support genocide
• support large corporations
• support destroying the planet
• support suveillance systems
• support war
• fight aganst making the rich pay their fair share of taxes
• support rapists for president
• support authoritarianism
• openly fight against what their voters want
• support mass deportations without due process
• support the killing of american citizens
• support torture programs

two completely different parties

lol, sure thing buddy

No, your a partisan hack. You ignore data that makes your team look bad, and spin data to make them look good.

Well, sure, but the Democrats running a terrible candidate, with terrible policies, who tells the voters to sit down and shut up also makes it more likely that the Republican candidate will win.

“I don’t like what is happening in Gaza so I would rather see Trump elected to the White House than Kamala Harris”

I think that's weird logic as well, which is why I never said that.

Ok but did you ever wonder how trump was going support Israel because I’m pretty sure he was a billion times more supportive of the genocide than she was.

No, of course I didn't. I knew he was going to do exactly what he has done. What does that have to do with her support of Israel?

So if there are 2 candidates and one is worse on the genocide issue why do you feel the need to target the lesser evil instead of the greater evil? It makes no sense.

I do target the greater one all the time. That doesn't mean that the lesser evil isn't evil.

Anyone who really cared about the genocide would know there was a better chance that she would end it before trump would. If you wanted it to stop she would have been the better choice.

Citation needed. She literally gave up the presidency to keep supporting Genocide. Why would she do anything different after becoming president?

rump just gave Israel everything they asked for so is that better?

No, and I never said it would be better. It's always amazing to me that libs will defend rape, geocide, the murder of kids, torture, mass deportation, all because "the other side does it worse". I don't know how you can be so lacking in morals or ethics to not care about these things.