Begrenzung ist ein Vorwand. Es geht eigentlich um was anderes:

Treibende Kraft der Initiative: SVP

Die Zuwanderung in der Schweiz wird grossteils von Firmen verursacht die Arbeitskräfte brauchen. Diese Firmen werden gezielt durch Steueranreize angelockt. Treibende Kraft dieser Taktik: SVP. Die SVP hetzt dann gegen die "Ausländer" um Stimmen zu gewinnen. Widerspruch? Nein. Denn: es geht gar nicht um einen "Bevölkerungsdeckel" (der ist nämlich aus Gründen nicht mehr so hart sollte sich die Geburtenrate der Schweizer Bevölkerung steigern). Es geht darum dass Arbeiter:innen "illegal" in die Schweiz kommen und besser ausgebeutet werden können. Das drückt durch Konkurrenz auch die Löhne lokaler Arbeiter:innen. Gut für Reiche, Arbeitgeber, Konzerne. Die SVP macht schon immer Politik für Reiche.

Thanks to this discussion I was tempted to try: I can't say if you can fully dissolve PLA in acetone, but you can definitely use acetone to glue PLA pieces together. Actually sticks very well. I'm amazed. Not sure if works for all PLA filaments though ?

Artikel zum Thema: https://www.republik.ch/2026/01/28/25-sekunden-bis-zum-tod-und-die-luegen-danach

There's also text-based tools - not sure if they fit your needs. beancount (with 'fava' has a nice web UI), ledger, hledger. Good thing about text based is: you can easily use git.

Not sure if they go as 'budgeting' software. 'Accounting' might be more accurate.

Seems like this source is know for disinformation and propaganda: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pravda_network

Would like to know the content of that page.

Thanks Microsoft for admitting that Wimdows sucks. You didn't even try really.

I've seen police in german trains doing precisely this.

And it costs innocent people their lives or makes it at least very miserable. Yeah, what to spend billions for...

Honestly I'm not sure what the definition says. But in case of the original axolotl/signal protocol the 'ratchet' construction in my understanding allows to recover from a key compromise given that the attacker is passive (read only). Let's say you have to hand your phone to the police, they disappear with it for a moment and get a copy of all the keys you use for the axolotl protocol. As long as they don't manage to manipulate network traffic but only intercept everything your chat session will 'recover' once a new (EC)DH agreement is completed with your chat partner. This might not happen immediately though in case your chat partner is offline.

This property (securing future messages) can only be achieved with asymmetric cryptography. Securing past messages can in principle be achieved with symmetric cryptography: You could imagine a ratchet mechanism where each chat partner computes a new key by transforming the old key with a entropy-preserving and hard-to-invert function (such as sha3) and then deleting the old key (and also best deleting old messages).

P.S. Just did some reading: https://signal.org/docs/specifications/doubleratchet/

Forward security: Output keys from the past appear random to an adversary who learns the KDF key at some point in time.

Break-in recovery: Future output keys appear random to an adversary who learns the KDF key at some point in time, provided that future inputs have added sufficient entropy.

So what I meant is not called forward secrecy but break-in recovery. Confusing terms.