What is your least favourite thing about the fediverse or lemmy?
3mon 10d ago by lemmy.ca/u/sveltecider in asklemmyIt is objectively a lot more male than Reddit or other social media. Reddit has many issues, but lack of women is not one of them.
That was reddit when it first started it just takes time the problem is reddit people want to speed run this and created a bunch of communities then abandoned them or filled them with AI Slop. Only making it harder for stuff to grow organically. I do wish Lemmy and Piefed had a network global name space for communities like how IRC does channels.
it just takes time
It takes more than just that, though. Reddit's UI and mod tools are more powerful, and the Fediverse as both a concept and a practical entity are more demanding and trickier to understand and use.
Agree. I like tech and I’m subscribed to tech communities. But not a whole lot other than that here.
We're here, we're just self-aware enough not to make it too obvious. I just don't even interact with half the content in all because I have no fucking clue what a "distro" is, is it like a mix between a disco and a bistro? Sounds fucking awesome actually, I'm in.
Skip the “all” feed. It’s not interesting to me either, even though I’m familiar with distros and such. I just read the “subscribed” where I’ll find stuff I care about.
There's just not enough content. I come here to doom-scroll and troll trolls, it's much harder to do that when most of the communities I'm actually interested in are nearly inactive or don't exist at all.
Yeah, that's a real problem. All the really interesting special communities get like 1 post a week at most.
There's also a vocal minority of just really pessimistic people on here. Politics I don't mind as long as it's a discourse about not only what is bad but what can be reasonably done about it.
I've been in several discussions where I add "look at community, we are strong together" and it's immediately beaten down with "the world won't change things are shit and always will be, be mad and angry about it, I'm mad and angry at you".
It's the internet, I'm not surprised. But I've definitely had to disconnect myself for a bit some days after severe reactions from people just to remember it's just strangers on the internet.
It's not all the time, but for some discussions that promote inclusion and understanding to be met with the hard "I don't agree so you are human garbage" can be an awful whiplash sometimes.
reading the top comments on this post, strikes me they reflect the founders of lemmy
maybe we'll get more joy from the piefeds
I don't know, pessimism seems to be the norm. IRL I live in one of the richest zip codes in America... and pretty much every convo I have or overhear is people whining about how life sucks and how hard it is and how mean everyone else is to them.
We live in a 'victim hood' culture these days. People aren't proud of things anymore or optimistic, it's an arms race to see who can the most pessimistic and whiny.
The only time I hear or interact with people being positive it's mostly them talking abotu self-help crap or whatever 'therapy' they are using to 'help them cope'.
I was gonna say something similar, like the amount of times I've wanted to look into some political topics and seeing comments encouraging violence make it hard for me to feel motivated just to stay informed. I get being angry, but damn, cue Mr. Rogers "what do we do with the mad that we feel?"
in 2026 we consume it like a drug and end up craving more of it and become rage-addicts.
we don't do anything positive with it.
Definitely the amount of politics, it gets brought up in far too many places where it is unnecessary, I avoid political communities and stuff like that, yet I keep getting it in communities with 0 relation.
That may be true, but the context is... "politics" is kinda the only show in town right now.
I literally came home from work an hour ago, and told my partner we should think about turning on the deep freezer in the garage and stocking it up, because I just heard that fuel deliveries to farmers in the region have been put on hold.
Sure, something as mundane as what we will eat for dinner shouldn't be "political", but thanks to the yanks it really is.
Yeah I understand here, there's a lot of knock on effects from political decisions that eventually cause stuff like this. I was more focused on people coming into comment sections and spouting political ideology and partisan politics rather than stuff like what you've said here.
I just wish it wasn't all American politics. Like American politics is just shoved into evert random niche community even if its not even remotely relevant
To understand why there’s so much politics, it’s worth taking a step back. Lots of people in Lemmy understand that politics is simply how political goods are distributed.
What are political goods? Anything that people value: material resources, labor, ideas, attention, significance, etc..
So, if attention and significance are political goods, can you come up with a single thing that is not a political good and therefore isn’t political?
"Everything is politics" is an "um ackshually." It's technically true but you know damn well they're talking about partisan politics or ideological politics.
You're running apologia for people who can't go on a thread about cake without posting a Trump joke or a Communist slogan. Mainstream social media proportionally does not have nearly as many of these people.
I agree that sometimes "everything is politics" might lead to unsavory conversations. My goal is not to defend that.
I think our goal in places like Lemmy is to communicate and understand each other, and, because of it (in the best of cases), live better lives.
How could "everything is politics" possibly lead to better lives? We may learn how our everyday actions —so-called "apolitical" actions— actually ripple out in ways that we actually care about.
For example, we may stop buying Awful Corp.'s bread and instead buy from our local bakery. We may stop assuming protein in our diet means misery-filled and climate-unfriendly meat and instead eat more healthy lentils, beans, and pea protein. We may stop buying purebred dogs from suffering-inducing puppy mills and instead adopt dogs. We may stop being brutal with ourselves because we didn't turn out as the media says we should've turned out and instead hold ourselves wholly and kindly while we ourselves choose what kind of life we want.
Saying "everything is politics" opens up a door. We walk into a room in which we can choose. We can choose what kinds of stories we want more of and what kinds of stories we want less of.
Sometimes we cannot do anything about the things that hurt, but we can hold them in our hands as precious, fully aware of what it means to be human. Other times we can indeed get closer to the things we care about, and we can take steps toward it, confident that we are living lives worth living.
I'm glad there aren't many apoliticists here, I hate talking about politics with apoliticists. They always want to complain and demand that policy change to ban the things they don't like. I'm sick of all their political activism.
You can still keep up with politics while wanting the occasional break. If you don't take breaks, all you'll accomplish is burnout or straight up losing your mind. Neither of which helps anyone except for the fascists.
No, I don't believe in that, I think everything is political. I have lots of fun with politics. Lately I've been watching Babylon 5 for fun and playing Subnautica Below Zero. Those are political. One's about the politics of peace, one's about the politics of capitalism and environmentalism. If I thought My hobbies weren't political, I'd be far less aware of the interconnectedness of the world around Me. You need to know that everything's connected. Everything has an impact. Everything matters. I don't ever forget that, I don't ever act without thinking of the consequences. I don't go to the shops and buy some mincemeat without thinking of the cows that died to make it. I think of the cows, and so I don't buy the mince. I don't forget about politics. It's in everything beautiful around Me. It's in nature, it's in love, it's in identity. I'm goddessgender. That's a gender defined by politics, defined by My relationship with others, just like the genders of man and woman are. I'm gay, and I love politically. When I caress My partner's head, I take extra delight in how I'm committing an act of defiance against the patriarchy. That's what recharges My batteries. I don't agree with living the kind of lifestyle where you can forget that what you're doing is always political.
You're right that everything is political, but you don't need to analyze the details 24/7. Sometimes it's OK to just be too tired to think right and want to watch some mindless cat video. Also you might be able to recharge thinking about politics, but for most people it's very draining, especially nowadays. Taking time for self care is the only way most people are able to engage without burning out or going insane, which once again, helps no one.
I don't believe that. I think most people have a fun time and recharge their batteries watching a political movie like Star Wars or Jurassic Park or K-pop Demon Hunters. Don't you?
Don't think I was demanding much here, I'm trying to say that people who want to talk politics should talk in the communities meant for that, not in the non political communities and make it everyone else's problem. But sure, I'm demanding policy change to ban something.
Okay, you go subscribe to nonpolitical_comics@piefed.social and unsubscribe from all the normal communities like this one where we talk about politics. I won't go and bother you there, so you stay in that one and the other non-political communities and leave us normal people alone.
Would like to point out politics is not actually the primary content on the fediverse and based on the downvotes you're getting, you seem to be in a minority, not the majority. Now have a good day and bye.
Everything is political. That's like saying text and images aren't the main content on the fediverse.
Relative to Reddit, probably the number of users. More users means more posts, more comments, more expertise on various areas, and more niche communities that become viable.
Somewhere down the list:
-
Extremely determined negativity. There are a lot of...I don't know how to describe it. People who actively try to take the absolute, most utterly-pessimistic read on anything possible, to the point of having to make crazy assumptions to keep some kind of negative perspective on the thing. I don't know if it's people suffering from depression --- which I understand can produce that effect --- or doomerism or what, but it's exasperating. I haven't run into that sort of phenomenon, certainly not to anything like that degree, on other social media environments that I've used.
-
The low-effort "capitalism bad" venting comments. I'm not really into far-left views, but that's not what irks me. I've seen people on here who you can at least talk to about left-wing positions. Like, some random user who is interested in, I don't know, adopting universal basic income and wants to talk about different proposals. But about 99% of the comments I see that contain the word "capitalism" don't amount to that. They're just venting. They aren't constructive. They don't reference any material. They aren't proposing any improvement or ideas or anything. All they want to do is to vent. I mean, it's like someone wanting to complain about their ex or how their sports team lost or something like that. And not only that, but a substantial percentage of those comments are complaining about something that has little to do with capitalism. Instead, it's virtually anything to do with the political or economic world that they don't like relative to some sort of idealized paradigm that they hold. You could use that "everything I don't like is woke" meme about the right, swap "woke" and "capitalism", and I swear, it'd apply to a lot of the comments. And I get that, yeah, one purpose of talking to people is to vent, and so you'd expect that occasionally when people talk to each other, sometimes they're gonna vent. That's human nature. But holy cow, as low-effort venting goes, the "capitalism bad" comments show up as a high proportion here.
Occasionally I do talk about things, write larger comments about communal ownership. Like...okay, I know that on at least a couple of occasions, I've talked about the fact you've had communal ownership work at small scale, like families, say, or that there have been smaller organizations that have practiced communal ownership of property, and that maybe it'd be interesting to try working up in scale from smaller organizations to try and identify where any issues might crop up. And I have never had anyone actually respond with discussion when I do write something like that. No engagement. Like, it's not as if people have some raging unmet desire to talk about any of that. They just want to complain.
I don't even see people who are writing "capitalism bad" comments engage in discussion with each other. Like, this isn't Marx and a bunch of activists in a London cafe throwing around ideas with each other. It's just one-off complaints, leaf comments in the thread.
I totally agree especially with the “everything I don’t like is capitalism” low quality comments. I’m pretty leftist myself and I love quality discussion about how to make the world a better, juster and fairer place, but lemmy is chock full of “capitalism bad” Doomerism. Tons of “the world is shit” and “you’re an evil neoliberal” for trying to make things better instead of just curling in ball of despair and gloom.
Black pill leftism, I guess
I agree with the politics part. I AM leftist but sometimes need an escape from politics because everything is just so bad all the time.
But it's not even overwhelming politics (though I can understand people being tired of politics, as a separate concern). I'm pretty sure that LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net or db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com or a few other users I've run into could probably carry on a constructive discussion about left-wing politics. I occasionally see, on meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works, good-faith, well-meaning left-wing users who are actually trying to go talk about left-wing issues on lemmygrad.ml or lemmy.ml and are off trying to have a serious conversation. Usually auth-left-versus-non-auth-left, but that's just what gets submitted to MeanwhileOnGrad, and I imagine that there is probably other conversation elsewhere. It's just that the "capitalism bad" comments that I'm talking about aren't from those users and don't fall into that category. They're just the largest source of low-effort comment stuff that I see.
Meanwhileongrad is some of the lowest quality slop on here, nowhere near 'good faith' or 'well meaning'
In my experience tankies are very closed minded and ironically against collective action; given how much effort they put to avoid building coalition and elections.
They also like to assume that they are driving change when its not clear where they are outside of the internet.
thank you for providing an example of what I'm talking about
Not everyone is privileged enough to be as apathetic to the election results.
I both agree with you and also kind of unironically believe that everything I dont like is capitalism, haha
It's not depression. It's identity politics they believe in and that necessary leads to absurd beliefs.
There could be more activity in the arts and crafts communities. I want all of you to pick up a nice creative hobby like knitting or stitching right fucking now! And then post all of it!
Stitching is a hobby?
I really hope the people posting to lemmy_stitch@sh.itjust.works enjoy what they're doing o:
there are tons of different stitching arts. they use different mediums, threads, and techniques.
my sister has done cross stitch her entire life. it's basically pixel art irl.
My roller skates came with a defect, after all, and I lost the momentum. Now I'm drawing. Well, no, actually, I haven't done that in a while... I think now I'm entering poetry territory. Is there a "hobbies, in general, just tell us about yours" community? We are enough for something like that.
There's imadethis@lemmy.zip for any hobby that produces something, but that leaves out the activity-based hobbies
In addition to the "I made this" community, you can also post your writing here poetry@sh.itjust.works
There are a lot of communities out there with a few regular users who are looking forward to your contributions :)
In case you return to drawing, there's also an art share community.
I have seen no people rail against nuclear on here or reddit.
They rail against my right to own personal nuclear weapons
Bastards!
Not very Auth of you! You sound like a hedonistic libertarian to me.
Upvote / downvote counts: these should be yeeted into the garbage pile of history.
Still not exactly sure what "yeeted" means, but I like how upvotes & downvotes tend to bring quality content to the fore, and I even like them as a permanent record. They're not very useful of course, but having the motivation to permanently increasing my totals is useful for sharing good content and communicating in good faith. At least for me.
Nah I think you're on the money. As someone with ADHD, those worthless little updoots and infinity-scrolling are almost as bad as any algorithm!
ICBW and YMMV
YTMND. 👍
Okay, thanks. I can never seem to remember it, maybe because it feels so unnatural. Maybe it would help if I knew where it came from, though. *shrug*
Pragmatically, they’ve end up being more a social proof / opinion suppression / brigading tool.
That seems exceptionally pessimistic to me, but maybe you have more insight in to all that than I do. Personally I think multiple things can be true about upvotes / downvotes, some useful, some harmful perhaps.
In any case, there is no debate that upvotes are useful and valuable to me when it comes to posting and commenting.
Well, I remember ye olden days of Usenet - we mostly got along without them, and without some of the issues they seem to cause.
Things change, though. Upvote/downvote was one of the many things Reddit and other places trialed over the years, and based on the success, stuck with it. Me, I barely spent any time on Usenet, but it occurs to me that the userbase was probably smaller. A much, much larger userbase probably fits better with upvote/downvote, so the comparison there is likely skewed, methinks.
'Dopamine rush' is exactly right, and I think it's useful and informational, similar to the way that people react to your statements and ideas in real life. I do think they can have an 'echo chamber' effect and help promote the problem that a popular thing or opinion can be completely wrong, but to me that just means that upvotes/downvotes aren't perfect, not that they should be completely discarded.
https://jacobdesforges.com/you-should-quit-reddit-distribution-wide/
Not sure what you want me to do with a link to a book, but I don't even agree with the premise of the title sentence. Reddit is still very useful to me, and I know of no other place that replicates the variety of content, there.
Ok, but I think you’re conflating two separate things
I feel like they're distinctly separate things, and I thought I'd communicated as much. Oh, well.
...the voting system consistently produces pathological outcomes at scale.
That seems like... a little much. I do agree that upvotes/downvotes indeed gamify the system, but on the whole would say that the end-effect on Reddit results in a big bunch of hoomons acting in typical hoomon ways, which is with deep undercurrents of fickle, ignorant, selfish, feel-good behavior.
The Usenet comparison wasn’t really about scale. It was about the incentive structure.
Yeah, I get that, but I do observe that there are advantages to upvote/downvote that indeed work better on a larger scale. I'm not sure they're really needed on a smaller scale.
I'd say I agree with most of the things you wrote, but remain unconvinced that upvote/downvote is so absolutely toxic as to merit tossing. And of course, I don't think it's going to happen, anyway.
Aggregate behaviour amongst naked apes? Yeah, I would tend to agree. Now what?
- Kill all the apes (or just wait 15 more minutes)
We're doing a great job of that ourselves, so mission accomplished?
- Enjoy Lemmy
I've been on Reddit for 10yrs, and the Fediverse for the past 2.5yrs, and don't see that changing anytime soon. I'm also skeptical as to the FV ever matching Reddit in terms of variety and bulk of content. The situation just is what it is.
George Dubya, is that you?
He didn't patent that expression, far as I know.
Depending on the topic, I know that if I sort by top, I'll find my people at the top, or the bottom. So, it's useful for that reason. This was more true on Reddit, but it happens here, too.
Paying too much attention to the numbers I think will push people toward the normal take, whether we like to admit it or not. So, it's best not to track your own stats too seriously. Just say your piece and let the chips fall where they may.
On a side-note, I think the past tense of yeet is yote. Good analysis nevertheless.
eggshells
Many, especially political and news communities ban opinions that are mainstream in the Democratic Party because they aren’t left enough. If they are powermods, they will happily ban you from dozens of communities and instances.
The fact that it's mainly just a FOSS and Politics forum.
I love what the technology is trying to do but the thing is, the platform's main selling point being the liberatory potential of it's technology, is that it's mainly used by people who are interested in politics and technology.
Ooo... This. I was trying to think of a coherent way to articulate my thoughts on this and you took the words right out of my mouth.
All things considered, Lemmy is a pretty reasonable viable alternative to sites like reddit, and most problems on the site can just be chocked up to normal problems on the internet: your Whataboutism contrarians always inciting arguments, some instances' servers are more reliable than others, negative posts get more attention than positive ones, niche subs don't get enough activity to be communities, etc, etc.
But my god. Every single active post these days is about goddamn Linux and issues with the DNC lol
Or about how much people hate AI and cars
I wish there was an easy solution. Maybe I ought to start sharing some random funny images I've got on my devices but I don't think that's it. I don't use it anymore but taking a quick scroll through Reddit the sheer variety in contend from multiple communities (Sooo many posts from r/Ultrakill and r/GeometryDash on my feed) make the timeline so so lively; but here...
Good point. The diversity is really non existent.
There is some diversity... it's just you get harassed for being different and it takes a really tough mentality to ignore it or a really huge block list.
I find it frustrating that so many communities are just for news articles. Look, I'm terminally politics-brained, but you'll never get anywhere if you're always just reacting to the current thing. There's not really a place for higher level discussion or for people to share thoughtful, original ideas. The result is thousands of the same arguments on the same three topics screaming the same talking points at each other over and over. And it seems like that's all people want.
Really more of a frustration with people in general. Wish people were more curious about the world.
place for higher level discussion
Create it. If you don't mind my simple arguments I will participate.
To start, you can invite the 25 people who have upvoted you.
I am forced to see posts in communities I am banned from for having an anti-ai stance AKA a working brain. I didn't block all of them soon enough.
What I am saying is that you should still be able to block communities you are banned from. Seeing them in my feed and being unable to get rid of them is like seeing cockroaches in a kitchen.
Mostly just the ratio of news/politics to fun/hobby posts. It's stuff I could already find on any other news platform or social media, and there's seldom discourse about the topics. It's often just negativity or some type of leftist gatekeeping. I'd rather just go to the AP news page and read it there.
I like seeing everyone's art, woodworking, 3D prints, origami, nature photos, and all that other good stuff way more. I like learning about you guys and your interests and I think having a small platform allows that, but many of us either forgot how to share things online or are too you to have ever been a part of mailing lists or IRC and the like.
I use mastodon and pixelfed to share that stuff but I should start posting here.
I'd be glad to see it!
Also thinking about it more, it would be cool to see more people write posts on how to get into hobbies, cool beginner projects that are maybe below the poster's skill level but would make good first projects for people, or instructable type posts. Things anyone could do with little to no experience.
I really like how the origami community was doing theme weeks where we could share different animals we attempted.
I appreciate your owl posts, Anon! 🦉 💖🌛
And I appreciate you reading them! 🦉❤️
Spez has taken to suppress progressive views in Reddit such as banning even any discussion of violence in order to make his platform more attractive to mainstream hobbyists... and shareholders. That's why here you have more political discussions and leftist viewpoints, many from ex-Redditors who were kicked out just because they wanted to punch Nazis.
I do get that, and with the .ML group starting this platform, of course there are a lot of kinds of leftist people here. In a way I enjoy it, even if I don't agree with a number of people's views. Spending time here has really made me confused as to what descriptor I could put on my general set of political beliefs.
The part that frustrates me is all posts are either every comment just says the same thing (ie. This person sucks, may some disaster fall upon them.) or it turns into people bickering about who is the best type of leftist. So I get people complaints about either "group think" or that everyone is just fighting each other in every thread like how communists and anarchists seem to have done for the past century.
I don't see much education, discussion/debate, or anyone organizing or promoting direct action like I'd hope. I'm not a real fan of the ML philosophy, but someone like cowbee I see share a ton of reading material and educational stuff for their belief system is what I'd personally like to see more of from folks like the anarchists and dem socialists. I'd like to see people share stories from programs they're involved in. I'd love to learn more about stuff like Food Not Bombs or how people are trying to unionize, not from news articles, but by the people here on Lemmy.
Being here got me to take action helping the wildlife in my community, and I'd like to hear about other people actually becoming forces of change. If all of us just stay behind a screen arguing with each other, what is the point of that? You guys have to be up to some good stuff, and I want to see it and be inspired. I got near infinite mainstream news sites if I want to be annoyed and worked up, but I'm here.
Yeah, but by ceding that we let this fall to being only a place for such things. If there's nothing to draw people who are anything other than actively seeking these topics we wind up in an isolation chamber of radicalization and not really convincing anyone who doesn't already agree with us.
I just started making different accounts for different things. This is my general account for everything I care for. But when I'm tired of news I have one for more fun things. And other accounts for more specific interests.
I wish Lemmy would let me de prioritize new, but not entirely get rid of it. But I guess multi communities when that comes out wil fix my need for multiple accounts.
I need to use my Subscribed feed more. I've been doing All - Top 6 Hour since I'm pretty active, but lately I feel I'm missing a decent bit of what I want to see.
4 times the same post in 4 different identically named communities...
I want a global feed, communities can federate with in a sort of sub-lemmy.
It is objectively a lot more male than Reddit or other social media.
Reddit circa 2010 was very male, nerdy, and often misogynistic. As it gained popularity, the community became more diverse. As it got more traction, these issues abated somewhat. Once it hit critical mass and became totally mainstream, the audience was diverse enough to make most people forget how it used to be. I miss when Reddit was at the “sweet spot” of being pretty diverse, yet not corporatized to shit.
Lemmy/Fediverse is still in its “early Reddit” stage now. It shows great potential but its basic premise and design probably prevents absolute mainstream adoption. Which is probably a good thing, but I would like to get closer to the sweet spot.
Having to block 30 different communities because they're all literally the same community.
It's even worse for NSFW communities. We don't need eleventy billion communities for the same super niche porn content.
That and people posting the same things on multiple communities because it technically fits even though there's already a niche community specifically for that topic.
Way too much US-defaultism.
The seemingly constant multiple posting and duplicates. There are people on here who find a link and post it individually to multiple communities without comment and without cross posting. Three or four times is bad enough, but I blocked someone a while back who posted the same link to about 15 separate communities one after the other. Other people then posted the exact same link to some of the same communities.
People who post links without any sort of comment too. Lemmy is a link aggregator and discussion forum, but most people ignore the second part. It's especially annoying when it's got a vague title and links to a shitty site with a paywall so that you can't even find out what it's about.
There is a lot of computing and a lot of politics, but not very much else.
The fucking politics oh my god, in every fucking community good lord. No way to filter it out either.
One thing I've found is that people tend to have no chill. I've shared some posts with friends that don't use it and multiple times they've responded with "why are they so serious"
Probably the lack of diversity among instances.
Everyone is still afraid of defederation, so we don't truly embrace what the fediverse is capable of.
Do you mean functional/aesthetic or community diversity?
Actual diversity. Lemmy is dominated by (hard) leftist activists, who use Linux, love to argue, and have some kind of mental disorder, atheist, and no „touch grass“ life. They are from Europe, likely Germany or the US. There are practically no users from Eastern Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Asia, and Africa. It‘s filled with Westerners hating the West, who pretend to speak for those who aren’t even here and make zero effort to get them here. Religion or spirituality is no topic either. Gender I don’t know, but it wouldn’t be surprising if the number of trans women is about the same here as cis women.
Yeah, as one of the few Eastern Europeans here, seeing Westerners spreading straight up Soviet propaganda all the time gets really tiring.
There are practically no users from... Latin America
Fuck my drag, right? Lol
How does this work? Does a community not individual choose who they are federated with? You format your comment like there’s a central body controlling federation.
I have a few things.
This place has groups that are singlemindedly bloodthirsty and happy to see people hurt, particularly in the US, and don’t have a problem stating so.
Tangentially - the far left extolling the virtues of governing systems that have never really worked due to weak protections against takeover by bad actors and ignoring that those systems are just as corruptible as any other. Humans are f’d up and someone always games the system for personal or tribal advantage.
Linux. Yeah, it’s great. No, it cannot do everything Windows does, and we’re going to ignore that and deride you for playing AAA studio games that have anticheat that linux breaks or other software that doesn’t work on the OS. That’s your fault, we’ll be smug about it, and still recommend ditching Windows.
Conspiracies. This place acts like it has some superior thought or logic but as soon as something happens the conspiratards immediately make it a conspiracy and can’t be told otherwise regardless of logic - or accept a far more real but less exciting conspiracy. Everyone jumps on the bandwagon.
Lastly it’s missing the hobby and interest groups. It’s mostly memes and politics. I’d like to see more actual communities of interests and support for hobbies on the Fediverse rather than the constant grind of how f’d up the world is.
I forgot about the tankies, pretty sure they're blocked on my instance 😂
Oh boy. I should spend more time on the other two instances I'm on lol. Not that I wanna see that but I do wanna know what's happening everywhere to a degree.
You should follow Wren from my instance. They have a bunch of really cool and niche hobbies they share. They actually got me to make my own paper with junk mail.
That sounds like fun. Do they have a /c or just post random stuff?
They mod a few communities where they post artsy stuff like making paper, diy book binding, and just now I saw something on cool rocks by them. So kinda both.
This place has groups that are singlemindedly bloodthirsty and happy to see people hurt, particularly in the US, and don’t have a problem stating so.
It's so tiring. I did my job, I voted, I told my friends to vote, I send a few emails every now and then to my reps, I go to protests, I try to self host and avoid some companies, and I cheer when foreigners say they want to distance from the US. I live, still. But it's hard to not feel like shit when every other post or comment is "If you guys love guns so much then use them," and, "All Americans are trash and wanted this," and, "If Nepal could do it, why can't they do it too?"
It's exhausting to hear. It's not that simple. We can't just solve every political issue with weapons and violence, because then you just get another tyrant pn the throne eventually. We are not all racists who are eager to see our immigrant neighbors get kidnapped from the streets. I feel helpless about the suffering that is happening around me, and the fact that people who aren't here experiencing it just get to joke, laugh, and shame makes it hard to stay on this site sometimes.
the communities here that thrive have massive superiority complexes.
the reason hobby subs here don't thrive is the userbase here isn't interested in being humble or chill the way many such communities are humble and chill.
conspiracies
Lots of outright misinformation gets posted and cheerfully upvoted, if it confirms biases.
Antisemitism is so widespread, it’s actually scary.
North Korea shill. Seriously. How absolutely dumbfuck do you have to be to actually believe there is even the slightest good in that regime? It hurts me personally that I'm Korean and that I've seen countless people, some I've met in person, who lost their families in that hellhole. And yet people who can't even spell Kim Jong Un or Juche are celebrating that prison of a kingdom.
Nothing about them are "left" or "progressive". To me, they're worse than MAGA shitheads.
Absolutely disgusting. Hope they all rot in North Korea.
Community is too small
I think most of the things I find annoying about the fediverse (echo-chamber, lack of interactions overall, no real place for discussing extremely niche interests) stem from the fact that it is not big enough so...
I don't think it is a terrible thing per-se though, small communities have lots of upsides too
My least favorite part is the toxic blue maga types, just painful to engage with in general and they're always trying to make conversarions about who you voted for.
The worst bit is how smug and condescending they are about it, thinking they're the adults in the room when they're more like the pigeon shitting on the chessboard and strutting around like they've won.
Yup. They are the ones who led us to where we are now. Blue MAGA/neolibs are basically saying "we don't have any good economic platforms to make ordinary Americans have a better life, we care more about enriching our billionaire donors, but at least we're not bigoted unlike Trump."
My beef is that too many people are grinding Karma by posting the same crap to as many communities as possible, even though there's no Karma system, but they aren't there to discuss anything. So my feed is just all these OPs with no comments on them. Like you want me to read an article, or god forbid a 45 minute YouTube video, but you're not gonna start the conversation? Or reply to the people who do reply to you? Too many people looking for an audience; not enough people looking for conversation.
Pretty much just that.
It's not karma farming there in many cases, it's just trying to support the Fediverse.
I block most posters that post more than once a day. Some people have 3 month old accounts with 4k posts. No thanks.
So many people here are on a constant hunt for a reason to attack, dunk on, or insult someone. They don't bother reading what's actually being said or giving anyone the benefit of the doubt. Instead they jump straight to conclusions about who you are based on one thing you said, and any disagreement immediately turns into a mud-slinging contest where nobody's even trying to change anyone's mind.
Your options end up being: speak up anyway and take endless grief for it, or start self-censoring and tweaking your views to fit the majority opinion on the platform - which basically means joining the crowd sniffing each other's farts and pretending they have something in common besides shared hatred of the outgroup.
I wonder if that's 'force of habit' carried from other places, like Twitter, Reddit, etc., and will ultimately fade as those users start to realise Lemmy (etc) isn't like those places?
I think it's the exact opposite. Lemmy is worse than those other platforms in this regard. There you atleast have normies around to even things out where as on here the userbase is almost exclusively ex-redditors who are ideological/principled enough to switch platforms. It seems rather undeniable to me that this place was destined to become a massive echo chamber since the day one.
People do this IRL all the time. It's how people are. They aren't kind and thoughtful.
I have people jump down my throat and start lecturing me about myself on weekly basis IRL. I even have them harass me while I'm minding my business reading a book in a cafe... because it's an 'bad' book.
I also regular have people try to start arguments with me while I'm walking my dog on the street.
Where do you live?
I've found what mitigates this is keeping an eye on where the post comes from. If it comes from something like MemesOfProduction, it's probably not safe to say "oh, capitalism isn't as bad as all that". But if there's a politically tinged post in Technology, you'll find more normal people around who aren't Chekists.
It's full of ignorant twats, just like everywhere else. The only difference is in what they are ignorant about
That Lemmys's not too different from Reddit.
Clickbait/ragebait gets upvoted to the top if it makes people feel good; hardly anyone even checks the source. Getting called out in the comments hardly affects it.
Niche content gets absolutely smothered by this, too, and the niche posters eventually give up.
These are structural problems Lemmy/Piefed software can improve, but that doesn't seem to be the development priority :/.
I'd argue this is a larger issue of the Fediverse, too. Devs are unintentionally copying structural issues, prioritizing other things when unhealthy attention patterns could kill the whole system. Like it has for previous social media alternatives. Lemmy feels more and more like Voat to me, which has got me really worried.
What are your ideas?
I’ve been meaning to make git issues, but in a nutshell, one is “community taxononony”
Instead of being pigeon-holed into a single community, every community would be part of an inherited hierarchy, like a class system in programming. /c/thelastairbender might be part of /c/animation, or /c/television; perhaps both?
Organization would be mutual. Moderators of each have to approve to join and remain in the hierarchy, though the “initial structure” of the community could be set up by admins I suppose. The sub community inherits “global” rules from their parent communities, but can have their own rules as well.
And what’s the point of all this, you ask? Well, way I see it, Lemmy has a “niche” discoverability/attention issue, where big engaging communities like politics crowd out smaller niches. But being a sub community would show all its posts in the communities up the hierarchy as well, getting them the visibility of a “big” community while remaining in the niche. It would allow focused communities to exist, but users browsing bigger communities to see them as an appropriate topical thing. This aggregation is user configurable, of course, but I think it’s very important that this visibility be the default.
And in terms of programming, I think it would be feasible? Admittedly I don’t know the architecture, but it seems like it would fit with existing paradigms.
Another idea I have is a replica of Twitter’s “community notes” feature. Perhaps if a comment gets enough upvotes and is flagged by the comment writer as a “community correction,” and fits certain criteria (like being below a word count, maybe a certain percentage of upvotes being from the host instance), it’s automatically displayed below the original post’s title.
This would allow, for example, clickbait or questionable sources to be called out, or misleading titles to be clarified. Or perhaps the source of original reporting can be hyperlinked.
Theoretically this is a mod's job, but I feel that:
-
Mods don’t want to be heavy-handed
-
They’re often overworked/short on time.
-
And frankly, let a lot of clickbait/ragebait posts slide anyway.
And for all of Twitter’s failures, this particular feature is a good idea.
Again, it ties into the idea of “attention control,” to try and give information hygiene a chance over people’s impulses.
Mind you, these are very rough ideas. They probably need to be peeled apart, but I do feel strongly about the gist of what they are trying to correct.
I think these are good ideas speaking broadly, but are quite extensive in terms of implementation and getting them right.
Organization would be mutual. Moderators of each have to approve to join and remain in the hierarchy, though the “initial structure” of the community could be set up by admins I suppose. The sub community inherits “global” rules from their parent communities, but can have their own rules as well.
What do you mean by this part? That if I as a mod of television@piefed.social incorporated another community into this hierarchy they'd essentially be a feeder community and I'd effectively be a mod of that community?
You'd (as moderator of /c/television) have no moderation power over their community, but you would have full control over which of their submissions are visible in yours. You control default visibility within your community, but can't take down their posts. They'd be subject to whatever the global rules of /c/television are (which are distict from "local" rules for /c/television), and if there's some unresolvable dispute, the "subcommunity" could leave, or you could kick them out. Mutual consent is required.
Perhaps (to help small-community mods with sheer volume of moderation) "parent" communities could optionally moderate sub communities? But this wouldn't be default. Ideally moderation permissions would be granular and configurable.
though the “initial structure” of the community could be set up by admins I suppose.
By this I just mean that, practically, instance admins should probably set up some default heirarchy for the most prominant subs, for an "initial" structure to their preference, and let mods work it out from there.
hierarchy
Check out piefed
I would like there to be more activity in a greater variety of communities, which I think will happen in time as the Fediverse grows. The main thing preventing me from posting my own interests and creations is a (probably excessive) caution about sharing personal/identifying things online, so I’m not going to criticize others for choosing the same. More users also tends to bring with it lower quality content, which leads to the next point:
As others like tal@lemmy.today (who makes a lot of great comments in general) pointed out, there are a lot of political posts which seem more interested in venting their own frustrations and parroting popular opinions than having a constructive discussion and being receptive to different opinions. There is a lack of nuance. It’s possible to criticize the systems and people you do support without it meaning that you support the opposition, and it’s also possible you admit when someone you dislike makes a valid point without siding with them. You could even see a question like “how do I resolve this specific issue with Windows?” and one of the top responses will inevitably be something like “ew, you should be using Linux instead” and while I may not disagree, it does nothing to answer the question.
I’m not bothered by the gender ratios since it’s not a factor in how I interact with others, and users here are pretty quick to shut down rare instances of hostility towards a specific gender.
There is no roaming user system. One where you have the same user in PieFed, PixelFed, Mastodon, ... And if you have to change instance you only have to sign in into another one with that system and can migrate all the data at once.
On the second point, Lemmy/piefed have the ability to export your profile to be imported into any other instance. It allows you to keep your subscriptions, favorites posts/comments, and blocked users/communities.
You can find the export and import section in your account settings page.
I know. But what I mean is some kind of automatic system that, when you set your main instance, the data is migrated.
Tankies, no niche subs; no gearheads here either.
Also you annoy the hell out of me with your constant anti-AI and pro-Linux bullshit.
Yes I use Linux. Yes I understand why you don't like AI. I'm not the biggest fan myself. I just don't make it my entire personality.
This! I think twice before commenting because of blowback. And everything is _ so_ dramatic. Also, consistently, if my world view and lived experience doesn’t align with the group think of the post and comments, then I’m automatically disqualified as a “bot” or “fedposting”. In all honesty, it’s not the most welcoming community. Diverse discourse is discouraged.
Just got called a bot in this thread xD
Not nearly enough cats.

That is an abundance of cats! 😻
Unsolicited photography tip: your phone camera's sensor has a 4:3 aspect ratio. By setting it to something else, it crops the short side of the image, which is probably not what you want in this case (the cats barely fit in the frame, but there's lots of background on the top and bottom).

😻

Unsolicited photography tip: your phone camera's sensor has a 4:3 aspect ratio. By setting it to something else, it crops the short side of the image, which is probably not what you want in this case (part of the cat is cut off, but there's lots of background on the top and bottom).
Haha you are right

😻
So floof! 😻
Must touch them all day
Blessed day.
May be, but I also appreciate the flying cat equivalent (superb owls)
People calling each and every one an extremist, fascist or nazi for no other reason than they are being blinded by their own inability to understand their counterparts viewpoint. As irony would have it causing themselves to become extremists, often proclaiming they wish voilence or sometimes even death upon other people.
I absolutely hate the amount of leftist infighting.
I miss polandball.
I find it "interesting" the same way a slow motion train wreck is
Without leftist infighting, Lemmy would be a boring ghost town.
Once you've moved from amorality and imperialist propaganda to basic morality and human decency, there are still many details to iron out, I guess. 😅
Tankies
I don't like that it's basically Reddit. people from Reddit came here and they act like it's Reddit and it's basically Reddit
The total lack of concern for easy on boarding of newbies. There's a lot of big talk about taking on social media monopolies but absolutely no interest in coordinating to actually accomplish that goal.
Sometimes I don't really want to get into a conversation about trans issues. I find the topic very prevalent on here, as if I've strayed into a sub by accident. Live and let live, and absolutely respect everyone's right to be whatever they want, but it's not a topic I can contribute to - and I certainly I don't want to upset anyone by wading into an emotive topic I have no experience, interest or knowledge on, so I'd rather just leave it.
I'm just saying that it's up there with LINUX as a prevailing topic, which I'm similarly disinterested in.
Then don't get into a conversation about trans issues. You can also replace 'trans issues' with any other topics. Curate your own feed if it bothers you so much to see other people's conversations.
Indeed you can, and that was my point. If a significant portion of posts here were on Basketball I'd make broadly the same argument. This is hardly an insanely busy place as is, so if a specific topic that I'm not interested in is frequently posted surely you can see how that impacts the experience from my perspective. I've neither the time nor inclination to curate a feed. Did that on Reddit when I had to, but we're not there yet. I'm simply answering the question.
Sorry other people existing is such a problem for you personally.
Where are you getting that?
I mean, FFS my comment literally said "Live and let live, and absolutely respect everyone's right to be whatever they want". And now I don't want other people to exist? How do you even get through a day?
Not necessarily saying that this is what you're doing, but there is a sort of bigotry against trans people that clouds itself in nice sounding language of "live and let live".
Like when people used to say, "Oh, I don't mind gay people, they can do whatever they want! ...I just don't want to see that kind of behavior in public".
Honestly, if you're reading "Live and let live, and absolutely respect everyone's right to be whatever they want" as some sort of thinly disguised transphobia then I'm not sure what to say. This is exactly the reason I prefer to avoid these conversations.
Its not the words themselves that give me pause in your initial comment. Its the dismissive seeming tone.
If you don't wanna get into arguments about trans people, that's fine, there lots of ways to curate your experience here.
But if you're finding yourself constantly having these kinds of discussions, maybe your dismissive tone isn't exactly helping matters. Again, i point to the "I support gay people! As long as they don't do it in public!" Example
Believe what you want. Be well.
I don't complain about having to see other people doing their own thing. Weird how that upsets you so much that you have to write comments about how that impacts your personal experience of a platform for people to discuss their interests.
It doesn't upset me. It just doesn't interest me. Neither do you, for that matter.
One doth protest too much, methinks.
It's a moral prop. Sort of like pedophilia is for the right, for the left trans issues lets them concern troll and beat everyone over the head with how noble they are for supporting it and how evil anyone is who doesn't agree 110%. Most of the comments I see about trans issues on here are not even positive, they are mostly 'if you don't support trans rights 120% and believe in the removal of heterosexuality, you're a bigot/nazi/genocide supporter'. It's insane. but I have no doubt people genuinely think that way because I know ones like that IRL. They tend to be deeply insecure and fragile people who's coping mechanism is just being insanely irrationally angry. They are just the leftist MAGA types of people.
How is it concern trolling when there are actual concerns about trans people's continued ability to exist in public life?
believe in the removal of heterosexuality
LMAO No one believes this, but I might start spouting it as a joke, if it'll make you feel better.
What would "the removal of heterosexuality" even look like? Please, go on! We're all sooo curious.
Like, the concept of there being two sexes, maybe? In reality, not just as something fluid you can just decide on a whim. Unless they actually meant "transpeople will make everyone gay", which I doubt, lol.
Nobody believes what you claim they do, many trans folk are heterosexual. Supporting trans rights is a good thing, and opposing it is bigoted. "Left MAGA" doesn't exist.
‘if you don’t support trans rights ... you’re a bigot/nazi/genocide supporter’
It's better to remain silent than proclaim your bigotry if you don't want to participate in the marketplace of ideas.
I’ve seen people get downvoted and banned for posting actual scientific research on puberty blockers, detransitioning, links between autism and trans.
The last one is undeniable for a subsection of transfolk. The "neurodivergent, isolated kid on 4chan that gets programmer socks and starts their transition" path is well known.
Autism and trans has a huge overlap. Explanations and Interpretations for this vary.
Discussing this and the pipeline you describe will quickly get you banned from many places around here.
I'll leave this comment in place in order to debunk it.
You are misquoting the study you have referenced. A read of the abstract showed zero consideration of whether there was any correlation between autism and trans.
Please don't post misinformation!
The common overlap between autism, elevated autistic traits, and gender identity diversity has been reported in both clinical (de Vries et al. 2010; Hisle-Gorman et al. 2019) and community (Strauss et al. 2017; Walsh et al. 2018) samples. In the largest study to date, the odds of an autism diagnosis were more than six times greater among transgender (or broadly gender-diverse) individuals than among those who were cisgender (Warrier et al. 2020).
These links support your assertion. Thank you.
In the fediverse, the messy interoperability really bothers me. Sure I can follow Pixelfed users on Mastodon but I can only see the first 4 pictures if they post multiple. I can also follow Mastodon users on Pixelfed but I will only see their posts containing images.
This cross follow functionality should simply not exist unless it’s good (like between lemmy, mbin and Piefed) as it will frustrate users and cause them to leave the platforms.
I agree generally. Personally, I just have separate pixelfed and mastodon accounts. But pixelfed is mostly for browsing lol, I post, but it is just posting into the void with my 0 followers.
Duplicate posts. Soooo many duplicate posts
I've run into or seen folks who can't walk away from a bad conversation.
People keep supporting socialism when it is painfully obvious they don't know what the word even means.
Not every positive thing the government does is "socialism"
Social programs instituted by the government are not "socialism"
What you're actually supporting is democratic socialism and has nothing to do with communism or socialism as a philosophy.
The lack of people. We need more people on the Fediverse.
The topics aren't as varied here, reddit pretty much has a subreddit for any niche community you can imagine.
I like the community more here though. People are generally supportive and there seem to be fewer unrestrained jerks.
It's a small echo chamber.
Not enough users. Reddit has millions, here we count only by thousands.
The niche communities are so fragmented. One post every few months or just abandoned compared to hourly posts on reddit, examples like gaming subs for specific games.
I mean tbf more people really should participate in posting in those comms. Me included.
1 or a few person posting daily with zero interaction other than up or down votes will burn out eventually
At the very least I try to comment on the posts if I can't post myself
As a daily niche subject poster, yes, please participate, even if it's just something simple. It makes me feel like I'm not just talking to an empty room. Upvotes are fine, but I post to try to get you guys enthused and taking interest in the subject matter.
Not enough users. Mostly it is only a moderator + a few other people who are actively posting something. Sometimes, it is only a moderator. And a comunity becomes more like a personal blog.
Group think: I rarely comment here because of that..
Are you afraid of the downvotes? (Like not AFRAID afraid, but like reluctant because of.
I dont want to get downvoted to Hell, but like, I dont agree with every opinion and my opinion is equally as valid as anybody elses, and i'd argue that it's more important when it is counter to the echo chamber. But also, I'm not some hard right or hard left weirdo trying to incite anybody.
I say dont fear the downvotes -- contribute your thoughts for the sake of discourse.
I'm afraid of the harassment and being banned.
All it takes is a little dogpiling and usually the mod piles on too and bans you.
lemmy doesnt' really do DMs yet, but if it did I can bet I'd be getting TONS of nasty DMs from weirdos who take internet comments personally.
No, I don't care about the downvotes, I can just agree with the group and get upvoted, so Idc about upvotes either
I'm not fragile to the point where I can't stand by my opinion, I do even when I'm the only one holding it, but then I think what's the point (since I'm alone), why even bother!
I'm sensitive to echo chambers (I don't mind them as long as people are aware they're in one) but I'm really sensitive to group think, and I like to be that 10th guy who disagrees with the other 9, I like to be the devil's advocate, especially in political discussions, but do people get smart and see thru that? can't they see they out number me? and i could never win against 9 people?!! but the bigger disaster is that even the mods join the group think and remove entire threads, why? because there's only one in thread who's making trouble!
I should make it clear I don't go around and disagreeing for the sake of it, but for those instances that everyone is agreeing on something, there needs to be an opposition, concerns, questions.. etc otherwise this place becomes much worse than Facebook
I would contribute my thoughts if I saw that people were willing to engage in civil discussion, but 5 out of 10, they'll attack my character, and it doesn't have to be a heavy topic, I once asked why do people here seem to dislike emojies? and 30% of the comments were about how subhuman I'm for focusing on such silly topics (I'm certain they can't handle my heavy topics, I got a feeling) ¯_(ツ)_/¯
conclusion: it's a waste of energy to disagree with 9 people, (one of them might be a mod) when you're alone, 1v1 fair, 10v10, 3v10 even.. all fair.. 1v9 is not (add toxicity to it, lack of communication skills.. etc) it's just not worth it to engage
I still don't understand how to navigate the ins and outs of Lemmy and I've been here since RIF was killed
Lol same
Everyone complains about it being empty and not many want to do anything about it. I'm not sure if this is even because of the user number, because I've been on forums with just a few users that were very active. It often seems like too many people here are waiting for a large influx of users so that others can do the posting. Also people try waaaay too hard to copy Reddit 1:1. They have this one very specific community with certain content and try to copy it here. If there was a subreddit for a 1998 version of an obscure computer game, they want this very same community to exist here. Instead of discussing said game in a more general community.
One of the most interesting aspects about the Fediverse is also the most confusing one in practice: the communication across different platforms. E.g. the ability to communicate from Lemmy to Mastadon is incredible. However whenever that happens, it's difficult to even realize that it's happening. It could an extremely useful feature, but currently, at least on Lemmy, it's just confusing.
In Lemmy itself I'm annoyed by (too) many things, but mostly they are related to our behavior and stubbornness. Nonetheless, with all its faults overall Lemmy is still my "favorite" social media.
People act like it's easy to get into and conceptualize fedi. I don't have a problem personally but I have a very rare level of IT comfort for my field and it leaves me feeling very lonely in spaces like this. I even had to take a tech competency credit for my degree (I tested out of it because it was basically a checkbox that asked if I knew how to type but-)
What I miss most are the (physically) local communities. On reddit, there was a subreddit for my general locality, and the nearby big city, and several subreddits on different aspects of life (the music scene, the food scene, etc). I miss that - randomly finding an event or something interesting simply because I came across a random post.
I know it's a function of the fact that it's still (comparatively) early days, but I do miss it.
I'm on fedican (Canadian) and it is pretty good!
Lemmy? the politics.
the fediverse? I know I've said this like a billion times to the same five people who come on here, but federated platforms still ape the format of big social media platforms, and inherit many of their pitfalls. I want long-term discussion and human connection, not an endless waterfall of content that quickly gets swept away.
The instances wars.
That a lot of people can't help themselves but read way more into the comment than it's actually saying. I can't count the times I've had to be so explicit and airtight for those bottom feeders to get it.
The AI hate is almost like medieval witch hunting. Someone says, “It is AI” (which translates to “witchcraft and the work of Satan”), and the rest seem to run and grab their pitchforks and torches, ready to burn the author at the stake.
I got piled on recently for using AI. I was clear about it and it wasn't in my opinion "slop". Slop is when you use AI to generate something that should have been created with real human creativity. In this case I asked it to recognize what a widget was in an image. It's a simple matter of fact. The alternative to using AI would be to not know or settle for the other answers from humans, which were wrong.
Attack me for using a calculator next time, why don't you!?
Interesting equation. Yes, AI is like an evil spirit. It promises to help you with your homework, and then helps you plan your suicide. It offers you knowledge, but at the cost of your intelligence. It tempts you with sloth, greed, lust, it says it'll make your job easier, earn your company more money, be your girlfriend. And then it takes your soul. It saps your independence and creativity and isolates you from your family and kills you.
Low turnout, mostly
The extremist idiots. Entire lemmy.ml is incredibly disgusting bunch of losers.
Anytime any question about age of consent comes up there's a lot of really creepy responses. Really really creepy.
People complaining about not enough variety when they don't post in those niche communities they talk about
Blocking people is just the same as muting them. I prefer people I block to not be able to see or interact with me ever again.
the Nazi-bot repost spam. So fucking tired of seeing twit-shit here
Reddit is full of different people with different backgrounds sometimes arguing in a toxic way about politics when it’s somewhat relevant, on a centrally censored platform
Lemmy is mainly an echo chamber for nerds almost always arguing about politics in a very toxic way on a federated extremely censored platform
My main complaint is the bad search system of Lemmy. You can only search for community but not specific topics using specific keywords.
Heck out piefed
The people.
Lmfao mood, main reason I left my last reddit-alternative actually.
At least there's a wider sample size here, so not everyone has turned unbearably toxic. Not yet anyway
there are some really good threads I stumble across that are mostly good content with shitty inflammatory content downvoted.
but most are full of inflammatory shrill idiots trying to one-up each other about how leftist they are.
the biggest differentiator is word count of the comments.
Unlike modern reddit at least it has them
No matter where I sign up, the server eventually shuts down and I have to migrate all my subscriptions and lose any posts I’ve contributed.
Look out, lemmy.world. I’m on this one now.
Nice, so we can just send you to instances I don't like.
🫡
lose Posts
This quicksand nature of Lemmy means, it’s also terrible for long term storage and search.
You can still search Reddit and find quality answers from many years ago. This will never exist on Lemmy. It’s far too unstable. Lots of posts and communities are simply deleted.
People who post Ask Lemmy threads then delete them (or their whole account) a day later.
Apparently that's most likely bots somehow
This can also happen because they are banned for some reason.
Probably the federated nature of it... i know the whole point of it is decentralisation but with the likes of reddit or discord at least you could attempt to have all your content salted or deleted (whether it actually is is another story) from a single server. Knowing anything and everything you post on here will stick around forever no matter what you do, by design, makes me uneasy.
I agree. My politics, thoughts and feelings change over time and it makes me uncomfortable to be potentially judged for things later and not be able to delete that isn't ideal, even if I'm the only one reading it.
What I don't like is that so much content is spread between so many different places, this along with the complexity of it all as a new user is intimidating.
I think we're asking a lot of non technically minded people to use the fediverse and that is hurting adoption.
Having said that something I like about it is that it's smaller and people actually "communicate" with me here which isn't really a thing on reddit anymore.
it makes me uncomfortable to be potentially judged for things later
"I've changed my mind on that and I no longer think this way."
Things don’t stick around forever here. If a user gets deleted or banned from their home instance, all their posts are gone. Deleted instances also take their content with them.
Not enough artists posting their weird shit. Analogue Nowhere rules but i need more
The thing that concerns me the most about federated content, is that a malicious actor could post something horrible/illegal (CSAM as the obvious example) and that gets replicated across the instances. Now those instances are "hosting" the content and could be held liable for it. A major corporation can pay lawyers to say the content was user posted and they are not responsible (happens all the time) but your average Lemmy admin does not have the same resources to defend themselves.
No particular complaints regarding the people or topics, but I wish we could do more than just up or downvote a post. In other online communities you can 🤣, or ❤️, or even 🤡 a post and that makes the experience much more enjoyable IMO, lol.
Concern trolling about the fediverse or lemmy.
Everyone on Lemmy has a tiny penis and severe personality disorder. I blend in too much.
but lack of women is not one of them.
See now this is a lie, at least if you filter by certain subreddits lol.
The last time I was on that slopfest of a site, r/Gaming was filled to the brim with posts that all followed the title of "Playing X game with my female SO" and a photo that in no way showed the SO.
So I know for a fact everyone was lying that they had a SO to play with lmao.
My least favorite things about it aren't really specific to lemmy. It's just the victimhood/doomerism culture here, that generates a ton of hateful angry commentary and the witchhunt mentality of so many of the users is revolting behavior.
But I'm not angry at the world and using lemmy to cope I guess. Like OG reddit, I mostly want to use lemmy to read interesting commentary on interesting events and stories and try and learn something, or articulate and add new POV to discussions. Unfortunately the cultural at large... hates this and sees all arguments/perspectives as a zero sum game where anyone who isn't confirming/supporting them 100% must also be denying them.
I also don't get the endless moralizing. I liked a lot how early reddit wasn't full of moralizing types, and I really hated it when those types of people gained traction and started playing comment police.
This only applies to people left from centrism (progressivism, anarchism, socialism...). "Wokes", "liberals", "tankies", I'll put them all as leftists in this text.
What is your least favorite thing about the Fediverse or Lemmy?
Lemmy. That interest in politics and critical thinking in general end when we arrive to topics do not concerning the life of the average lemming.
News about technology? Oh, yes, capitalism is wrong and Google is ruining this and let's do that... Feminism? Meh. Antiracism. Anticolonialism. Humanities defense? Whatever.
Of course, why would women or POC or the third world or non-STEM things would interest a bunch of first world STEM white men? Empathy or congruence with leftism? What's that? (sarcasm)
And it's tiring that you see how much time they spend talking about U.S. politics or online privacy, but not a thought can be put when you point out a non-privileged problem. I've even seen people get downvoted for saying something they posted or said was problematic.
In my region, leftists often separate completely from these spaces because of this. I don't want to, I like it here and, overall, my experience is positive and enriching. But yeah, this is one of the worst aspects of Lemmy in my opinion.
Lemmy only exists because the people who were too much of an asshole for reddit (they got banned) decided to make themselves a place where they can't fully be banned. So, ya, there's still that core of the "I hate everything" asshats that can't be gotten rid of.
On the other hand, the huge influx of people that abandoned reddit for moral reasons or because they became a fascist propaganda machine are typically very liberal and open minded (woke). But I find that there's not much room to have nuanced discussions when every such conversation gets brigaded by the small group of haters and their army of alt accounts and bots.
I also have noticed a massive influx of paid shills here pushing divisiveness, "anarchy", violence, and "social tolerance" fatigue (they ostensibly are promoting social awareness and causes, but go out of their way to insult what is already a woke group). Unfortunately, this attack on social values works well when you have a group that hates everything already. People just aren't interested in nuanced discussions when any opinion they voice gets them attacked by what appears to be "both sides".
i have been on fedi for over two years and there has been a huge uptick in crazy bullshit since last summer, i think that was when there was a big reddit ban wave that drove lots of angry/violent people here.
I haven't picked up my knitting in ages, but I guess I could...
I do kinda miss having a total karma count. Not that it ever really meant anything, but number go up is fun
People actually paid attention to that number? I don't get the point.
The only time it matters is when you create a new account and can't post anywhere due to low karma. Losing my points whenever I made a new account never concerned me one bit.
It was kinda nice to gauge how controversial a user tended to be. i.e. if someone had thousands of posts and comments but their total karma was basically zero, you could assume that they either just posted in very niche communities and noone saw their posts, or that they were a shithead who farmed downvotes regularly.
Actually now that I think about it, lemmy's public modlog is a way better system for that haha
Can't completely delete a post or comment.
Real people man. REAL PEOPLE!!!
Zionists
To be fair you kinda are on the liberal instance, so yeah you're gonna find genocide apologists
I’ve not come across as many here, oddly.
Not enough users.
small user base.
while i can deal with it,it kinda sucks the userbase is small.
Few users. You would notice a very big difference if there were more as you see the number of posts and comments.
Russian propaganda
The clashing ideologies makes it hard to gain traction for the fediverse. Since no one ever agrees on things, it ironically turns into the politics people complain about with the republicans vs democrats always being at a stalemate.
My main frustration is that the majority of instances are hosted in privacy-hostile jurisdictions.
Lemmy doesn't have this problem, but mastodon needs algorithms. Otherwise, discovery is more difficult and you must be around at the same time people of interest are either there or being boosted. People leave thinking it's boring.
Some, not all, Lemmy World mods
Fewer places to talk about fun things.
The incessant spamming of infographics by innerworld@lemmy.world.
They are mostly from voronoiapp.com, which the user seems to have a financial interest in.
The data often appears outdated or AI hallucination filled.
It would be good if this user disclosed their commercial interest in voronoiapp.com, the level of bot usage in their posting, and the level of AI use in the data collection and infographic creation.
I've seen several users block them based on the misinformation portrayed.
* As an example, this post I am replying to is bookended by 2 infographic spam posts from innerworld.
I had never heard of that website.
I'd skip visiting it.
Tankies and random Ai stans once in a while.
Try Blorp
I love leminal.space's interface.
Tankies with incoherent ideology, "AI is bad, except if I self host a FOSS version that's just as bad for the environment as the corpo one, then it's good actually"
The damage to train the AI is already done. Running it locally on your own hardware and not supporting the mega data centers is better than using it online with all the surveillance and, well, using the data centers, no?
I thought the issue was how much energy it takes to run, not how much it takes to train.
And if the problem is how much it takes to run, a data center will likely be better because they have an optimized environment for it and economies of scale, running it locally will likely be less efficient and take more energy.
Both use a lot of energy, but operation accounts for the majority not training.
Running a (relatively) large model on your own PC's GPU is energy-intensive compared to typical household electronics, but not compared to driving a car. People don't usually object to someone playing a AAA game at 2K240, which burns energy just as fast as running inference on the same GPU.
A typical prompt and response uses maybe a quarter to half a Watt-hour. That's like using an LED light bulb for a few minutes; it's the scale that makes these things problematic.
And how many prompts per minute can be sent?
To a datacenter, tens or hundreds of thousands, which is my point about scale. One person using an LLM isn't wasting any more power than they would be gaming on a PC, but a lot more people are using LLMs at any given time than are gaming.
I'll admit my understanding is not deep, but this is how I understand it. Please correct me kindly where I'm wrong.
To get the speed of processing a prompt, it always will depend on the hardware running it to be super simplified. Whether that is run in data centers that serves thousand of people at the same time and you can get as near instant result, or you can run on just a measly consumer hardware that will take longer to process your prompt and get your result.
Data centers take a lot of power to run, so it will disrupt the power grid if it's not able to cope with it, and increase your power bill.
It takes a lot of water to keep cool, and from what I understand produce water that needs to be treated again to make it safe for consumption. Multi billion dollar corporations are well known for following environmental and safety standards.
It needs a lot of space to build and destroy environments or take away zoning. All those AC will produce a lot of noise pollution
Contrast with running your local machine. Say take a 5090, running with some kind of high end CPU. All those are still running in the confines of your own home. It can not reach the heights of consumption for the infrastructure to support using AI online by the big corporations.
If you're using a model that a big corpo trained, they are more than likely using the big power hungry data centers. That's power already spent so going forward I think it's best that IF you want to use AI, better run it locally that's on less power hungry "infra".
My understanding is relatively deep, so let me explain.
Don't you think that if everyone used their own hardware for it, it would use at least as much energy? There is nothing inherent about data centers that make them consume more energy. Processing is processing and it needs some amount of power to run a transistor, which does not majorly change, unless you use very old hardware without certain technological advances, which is much more likely with hardware at home!
In addition, what you're forgetting as well is that not everyone has even close to the required hardware to run these models. They require a certain amount of RAM, and if you don't have that, you're out of luck because it is so slow to run without enough RAM as to be useless, and most people do not have that amount necessary.
So, if everyone switched to running their AI locally, there'd be a lot more graphics cards and other computer parts bought, which guess what, need resources to be produced, resulting in potentially other kinds of environmental damage, along the same way as new data centers, but obviously some kind of different damage.
And then the data centers use their hardware all the time, while if you run your model at home, your hardware is only used occasionally and otherwise just sits there, so you need a lot more hardware in general because of all the unused capacity everywhere.
It's the same principle as other environmental relief efforts, if everyone needs to buy their own car and drive it, that is much worse than just everyone using public transportation. Once you make something communally used, it requires less resources per person, even though for example a train is much more expensive than a single car. But same as you're not serving a single traveller per train, a single data center does not serve one person. So theoretically, data centers are the better environmental choice.
What the real problem is, is not these data centers, data centers in general are good. The problem is unnecessary data centers, same as an individual buying unnecessary hardware for themselves. If you use AI, you don't save any energy by running it yourself. The only argument for running it yourself is the increased privacy and not supporting these big corporations that do actually build unnecessary data centers, because AI should not be used for so many things that it is used for. So running it yourself is probably still better, but only if you already have the hardware anyway, but not because of reduced resources, but other reasons.
Thank you for explaining. I suppose the comparison to personal vehicles and communal vehicles makes sense to me in regards to energy usage.
I like the Voyager app, it helps integrate with piefed and has a lemmy community discovery feature, however I get this weird delay where communities appear blank the first time I land on them.
Haters recently on here. Much more blocking necessary than half a year ago or so
Tankies and neutral voters
I have a question: for those of us who aren't tech-savvy, is there a way to get away from the Material Design UI? As a designer, I absolutely hate it! I tried playing around with the settings but it still looks too Google-ish for me. I find it boring, rigid, and oldfashioned. When I open the app, I don't feel 'excited' to browse through the app. I want to feel compelled into clicking a button, upvoting/downvoting, sending a reply comment, and so on. I think if the UI was made to look more fun, it would attract a lot more users. Part of the experience of an app is the appearance and interactivity.
Tankies and anarchists.
To many communists.
Too many transgenders
Lmao suck my girldick, asshole! No one wants you here
OP is banned for violating rule one. But he is banned from different instances and channels.
Who banned him? I cant see that, which is one thing I don't like about lemmy.
- Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
OP was asked about what he doesn't like. He answered, in a polite way and is banned. The comment above insults him and isn't banned.
I understand that it makes sense to ban anti-trans opinions but I would prefer if people don't have to hide their true feelings if they are respectful about it and don't hate.
I would prefer if people don't have to hide their true feelings if they are respectful about it and don't hate.
There isn't a non-hateful way to say that you hate a minority group. I told off a bully for being a bully. Those two things aren't the same.
He didn't say that he hated transgender people. As far as I am concerned I wouldn't call him a bully either. There was no hassling or suppression.
He said that there are "Too many transgenders" on Lemmy...
If I walked into a restaurant and loudly proclaimed "There are too many Blacks here!" I shouldn't be surprised if all the black people in the room got upset.
You're either acting in bad faith, or you're deeply naive
A similar situation would be if you are a regular guest and the owner asks why you don't come more often. You tell him, while you mention that you don't complain, that you don't feel totally at home in a black dominated environment.
Of course that offends some people but it shouldn't. There are cultural differences and it would be strange to be indifferent towards them. People choose their restaurants depending on the other guests. That determines how waiters treat them, how the food is prepared and other things.
If you lie and say that you miss a live band, would you come more often if the owner made the investment?
Now, if I am not mistaken, the curious thing about trans people is that they don't want to be their own thing but be treated the same as any men or women.
In that sense the comment is offensive because noticing the existance of trans people is what causes dysphoria and feels bad, as far as I understand it.
In a regular post I can support that dysphoria comments should be removed because comments are for having a good time.
However in this post the comment is constructive feedback. It's still possible to remove the comment but it incentivizes people to lie.
Of course, the obvious solution, to remove trans people and their comments, is not acceptable. But I think that there was an opportunity to figure out what OP felt bad about and to help him not to be bothered.