What is the litmus test for presidents throughout history? What do we measure them on? How do we know how history will remember them? I am sure FDR for all he did had some people against him.
21d 10h ago by lemmy.world/u/Patnou in askhistorians
There's always some political-ideological biases involved, but US historians regularly review presidents on a variety of factors and there's generally consensus on most major figures, at least in broad terms.
That being said, there's not much to be done in many cases except wait - more recent presidents often have results colored by the political leanings of events the historians themselves lived through.
Most of our history had been covered up by the Vatican, because they never wanted us to witness against them.
There are a ton of videos by full-time biblical prophet David Wilcoxson on YouTube explaining this, and other concepts most people shouldn't understand due to futurism or preterism (https://inv.nadeko.net/@EndTimesDeceptions), or otherwise being Catholic-by-proxy (I was like this for my entire life until I noticed how I took the Mark of the Beast, by obeying the Pope [right hand]). It was entirely for religious reasons, and everyone who's a Protestant Historicist (the most conservative of all Bible-believing scholars, by the way) knows this once this information was verified to be Vatican-suppressed.