but according to guardian, "Bigotry" is really just a name for any opinion with which you happen to disagree.

and in your link "debate" is not mentioned

There is no universally agreed-upon legal definition of "right" or "wrong."

also

Popper did not advocate for pre-emptive censorship or deplatforming of fringe ideas themselves.

The paradox applies specifically to ideologies that seek to disallow debate entirely and dismantle open, democratic institutions.

not all "bigots" are against debate or democratic institutions.

also being any <pejorative> is subjective

There are no universally agreed legal definitions of “intolerance” or “hate speech”.

US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees.

what type of nose is that?

TLDR: terrorism as a service. A new form of terrorism in Western countries: “disposable terrorists.” Instead of trained ideological extremists, hostile states and proxy groups recruit ordinary people online for money to carry out attacks, sabotage, or intimidation. Using encrypted apps, cryptocurrency, and criminal networks, organizers can quickly hire low-skill operatives who are easy to replace and difficult to trace. The article links this trend to Iran-backed networks and describes it as part of modern “hybrid warfare,” combining espionage, cyber tactics, propaganda, and deniable violence.

not all abusers can change which is true but also not all abusers stay the same which is also true