GreenShimada

Indeed I would

2d 12m ago in politicalmemes from piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone

FWIW, those people don't love you for who you exclude, they hate together, and will take any excuse to hate you and exclude you, too.

Trump Celebrates Achieving Absolutely Nothing in Iran

2d 18m ago in leopardsatemyface from theintercept.com

Sorry, I meant that not exactly in sarcasm, but from the insane perspective of MAGA idiots

Hey now, he did achieve something - sending $300B in tax dollars to fund a bunch of people that shout "Death to America!"

Wait....isn't that considered terrorism under NSPM-7?

100% agree that you'll have far better performance with a light Linux distro. If you're having trouble running a browser, that's 5% of what's running with some bloated OS chugging along just to show you a desktop.

So Superman is actually bi, and it's only the "fruity drinks kryptonite" that lowers his inhibitions enough to be himself?

How do you reduce score on AI detectors?

3d 41m ago in nostupidquestions

You do really need to make a stand on this. Personally, I would offer a test or demonstration where you write a paper in a place where you can be assured to not be using an AI, and have them check the false-positive rate to show the vendor they have is bad. Short of that, you're really talking about pushback on an administration that clearly has only mediocre ideas, and is willing to let students suffer the brunt of their bad decision-making until you make it a problem for them.

Students should have a way to seek real recourse about this. Use it now and use it early to establish a record of receiving false positives, Otherwise you risk some professor later really causing problems with a 5% false positive rate and it being a huge problem for you.

Life in your 30s

3d 15h ago in memes

Fair points, though, maybe more so in the abstract. To be fair, when I go try and fix or adjust or tweak something, I do always tell myself "we're humans, we change our environment to suit our needs."

Though I think you're excusing burnout and BS social media hustle culture when some people simply don't want to do that. If you want to post everything on IG, go for it. But people shouldn't feel shame for falling into the lower right square. It's a decision some people make consciously, and others less so. Which, for me, feels like loss. We had this nice thing where it was great to see what my friends from 20 years ago were up to. And now I can't participate in it because it harvests my data, and I would tell them the same. The infrastructure found us, friction-free. And when it turned out that pipes were to suck us dry, the gap was real, and the previous infrastructure not up to the task of casually serving up information. Now it (barely) takes work to say hello to someone and has to be meaningful again. People should be allowed to be OK with that.

Which is to say that my evolution argument is that we have, within a generation, taxed the limits of a part of us that hasn't gradually worked up to a universal higher capacity. Better weapons have extinguished genetic lines with no regard for adaptation or evolutionary traits other than what country someone was born into. Given 30 generations, we don't physically adapt to having bombs dropped on us. We aren't selecting for terminally online people to reproduce more and be more successful in the species, either. Maybe we are and I'm so far out of it that I can't tell.

You know, for about a decade, everyone was pushed to share everything they did on social media. It was a mistake. It was a mistake on the scale of cigarettes and smoking inside and in airplanes and in hospitals and in schools. No one thought it was a stupid idea, and a lot of people pushed it as the only way to get jobs and show you're a clever chimp that can internet so hard because interneting hard was the cool new thing.

Lower right is the hangover from that. Anyone I didn't find or didn't find me between 2008 and 2018 wasn't ever worth connecting with. The people that did find me were nice to hear from once, and we haven't talked ever again, despite being connected, for 10+ years.

My grandparents and their parents, etc. went their whole lives never seeing people again and not knowing what happened to them because they moved one time and they didn't know their new address. Whole movies were about that. Elvis had a song about that. The last episode of the first season of The Real World ended with everyone moving out of the apartment, and once that landline and address no longer went to those people, it was 100% possible that those people would be gone from each others' lives forever.

Y'all, we're not supposed to collect and keep 27,000 casual contacts throughout our lives. It's unnatural. Our brains are not built for it. We're made to have a few dozen up to 100-ish close connections that mean something, including family you don't pick.

Email some old friends you don't text with daily. Send anyone you truly care about an email to say hi. If they respond, then great. If not, don't worry about it. Enjoy high fidelity communications with those who mater to you.

....and a Lemmy account

🙄🙄🙄

3d 22h ago in lemmyshitpost

I've lived in plenty of places where when the lights worked, they were optional.

What you're forgetting is that the other people don't want to fuck up their car by hitting your car. Usually. Like 98% of the time. It's the people looking for some mutually assured destruction that are the hazard, and they're few and far between.

WH Correspondents Dinner Theory - Extortion

1mon 21d ago in conspiracytheories@lemmyunchained.net

Stink, I cast you OUT!

3mon 7d ago in witchymemes

What are some weird corners of the internet you've stumbled across?

3mon 10d ago in casualconversation@piefed.social

FREE ADMISSION!

5mon 26d ago in linuxmemes