Yes, you are right, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR. The same applies to nuclear weapons. The sanction for its (ex-soviet weapon) use could always be given only by the President of Russia (yes, both Ukrainian and Kazakh). Not a single country from the USSR, except Russia, paid the debts that the USSR had accumulated in the last years of its existence.

Genius.

Remind me, are you aware of the existence of the NPT, and that Ukraine has also signed it? And yes, remember what Israel recently did to Iran for hinting at nuclear weapons, what fate befell Iraq and Syria, where there were plans to start producing nuclear weapons. I also see that you haven't read the declaration of independence of Ukraine yet.

And yes, then don't be surprised that I will demolish your house. Literally because of the delay in negotiations, Clinton flew to Kiev, scolded the president of the country, who was waiting for him in the cold, hinting that he would be fucked if he did not give nuclear weapons to Russia and flew to Washington. Oh, yes, this is still the 90s of the 20th century, study further the history around the relationship between Russia and Ukraine, you will see that the latter always chose the worst case scenario Аnd yes, you have once again showing an exceptional unwillingness to understand the issue about which write it down.

Man, I'll give you an analogy to make you understand, that is, I'll explain. Let's say there's a garage on your property, and there's a car in it, but you don't have any keys to the garage, car keys, or driver's license. And your brother, with whom you shared a plot, has all this, and this garage turned out to be on your territory. Are you the owner of this car?

These were Russian nuclear weapons, as Russia assumed the obligations of the USSR (debts that were simply huge), unlike the rest of the former Soviet republics, so it was decided that all nuclear weapons would go to Russia. Also, the entire nuclear weapons control system was built taking into account Moscow's primacy, and only 3 people could actually make the decision to use (launch a missile), and all of them from Russia (the president, Prime Minister, and Minister of Defense).

Also read the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine to understand the status of nuclear weapons in Ukraine at 1990s.

their nukes

Their? Of course, I don't know much, but please tell me how Ukraine produced, serviced, and disposed of nuclear weapons, preferably with an indication of enterprises located on the territory of the Ukrainian SSR (the Soviet name of Ukraine). I am more interested not in the production of delivery vehicles (yes, I know about Yuzhmash), but in the names of the charges themselves, and also remind me of the control system for the combat use of nuclear weapons deployed on the territory of Ukraine (I gave a little hint)

you want to call it exists as less than 10 missiles. And of those, already two have been used.

maybe you give me source?

They were made almost 20 years ago and include parts whose production was ended in 1990’s and can no longer be produced by any factory in any country.

You idiot. Sorry, but its real fact.

Rubezh is a type of missile that is banned by international agreements on reducing the nuclear danger. That the Russia has held to almost ten of those for several decades tells a lot about how dangerous the Russia is. While others have stopped using such mid-range ballistic missiles and have scrapped them, the Russia had just hidden them.

Maybe you tell the international agreements?

WHY?

maybe nazi assholes in EU? They too given to Israel money and weapon. And dont google nationational of Volodymir Zelensky.

спойлер

(Israel)

Are you sure than that drones were be russians?