For now, finding collections is very manual, primarily through word of mouth. In the future, we are planning to introduce some ways to browse and discover popular collections.

ok, so any recommendations of interesting collections?

Why not? Why Microsoft develops it's .NET ecosystem? Why Google develops Go/Dart? It costs them lots of money and they give it for free.

The answer is: they don't earn money on it directly, but these tools are a way to tie programmers to their cloud services. If you use .NET you'll probably end up on Azure. If Go - probably you'll use GCP.

So I suspect the same will be with LLMs. At some point they will say: "hey, you can use this LLM however you want, but as you are already using it, then you may want to know our platform is optimized for it"

So are we assuming here that LLMs won't become more efficient over time? GPT-3 has been a frontier model just a few years ago and it's performance blew everyone's mind at that time. I can now run equivalent LLM on my personal computer. Why can't we expect that after a few years Claude Sonnet level of capability won't be possible to accomplish locally?

According to this chart, it might be hard to find any better deal than Minimax M3. It's just absurdly cheap

https://openrouter.ai/rankings?benchmark=agentic#benchmarks

I wonder why exactly do they want to increase AI compute that fast.

I would understand if their current infrastructure weren't able to handle traffic of core services like Facebook. Then it would be justified because it would mean worse user experience and less profits in effect.

But AI? Have I missed something? As far as I know everything Meta have shown so far were just toys. So why are they in hurry?

Sorry of discussions are not allowed in this community

Hello, mod here, discussions are welcome

Hopium administered

It amuses me that in a community named literally "ChatGPT" people are downvoting post about new GPT version

Defenders finally have a chance to win, decisively

I'm curious how it will turn out to be in a long term. Are we going to have safer software? Because not only defenders will have a powerful tool, but attackers too. But at the same time, number of bugs is finite... Can we in theory one day achieve literally zero bugs in codebase?