EU fines Temu €200 million for faulty online risk assessments | Euractiv
20d 10h ago in europe@feddit.org from www.euractiv.comEU fines Temu €200 million for faulty online risk assessments | Euractiv
20d 10h ago in europepolitics@feddit.org from www.euractiv.comFrom threats to talks: US leaps to defang net-zero shipping deal | Euractiv
1mon 18d ago in climate@slrpnk.net from www.euractiv.comEstonia is the rare EU country opposing bans on children’s social media use | TNW
2mon 7d ago in europe@feddit.org from thenextweb.comWanting to change the world includes having to come up with alternatives. Just complaining does little. If I (purely hypothetical) were to add a moderation rule it would be that if one is on principle opposed to a certain media outlet, regardless of the quality of its coverage, then every complaint about it should be accompanied by coverage from a more acceptable outlet providing similar coverage.
Because I could not find any initially. I replaced the Politico link with the TNW one before even noticing the tedious preaching about Politico. Not a fan of Springer myself. Just not to the point I will be an annoying twat spamming every thread about it.
Even better would be for them to go and find coverage in non-Springer outlets and post it instead in case a Politico link is posted. Now it is just all noise and no signal.
You can take it up with the moderators of this Lemmy to make it a rule. Or even better, to get other media to pay as much attention to EU politics as Politico.eu does. Because that is simply the reason people post links to Politico: it does a job that most other media do not. And for the most part it does it relatively well. You are otherwise welcome to shut up. I for one will not stop posting Politico links on matters that I cannot find other media articles on. And will keep reporting your spam about it as spam since that is what it is. It adds nothing to the conversation of the matter at hand.
Also, if you want to enjoy a leftist echo chamber, you could head to europe@lemmy.ml
Can you take your repetitive crying about Politico's ownership elsewhere?
Hungary’s independent media has already won the election | Euractiv
2mon 7d ago in europe@feddit.org from www.euractiv.comIran war fallout threatens ‘end of NATO’ | Euractiv
2mon 17d ago in europe@feddit.org from www.euractiv.com9/11 was an attack on the USA, which still is a NATO member. You could argue the attack was not by Afghanistan, but then Afghanistan was harboring the group that did.
The UN-supervised demilitarized zone on Cyprus is between Cyprus, which is not a NATO member, and North Cyprus, which is neither a NATO member, nor recognized by any NATO member except Turkey.
So you made three factual claims that are all three false. I will leave it as an exercise to the reader whether they carry the conclusion in any way.
Technology Connections - You are being misled about renewable energy technology.
4mon 18d ago in solarpunk@slrpnk.net from www.youtube.comGiven that the US military is part of the US federal government, yes, that is a difference without a distinction. If it is for general use, per your own source, and not earmarked for the US federal government, then it is by extension not earmarked for the US military either.
You could do worse than to actually watch the whole video and not dragging your dislike of having a military into a conversation that is not about that to begin with. Or as others have put it in a more pejorative way, stop it with the leftist bean soup.
Come again? I am saying "isn't earmarked for the federal government" and you come up with a fact check saying that it is not earmarked for military use. Which is the same thing.
Also, you are comparing the share of the military in the federal government's energy usage. The government's energy usage is largely electricity, not oil-based, while for the military it is the inverse. Also, the military consumes oil outside of the US economy: the oil consumption of an US Air Force base in say Spain is part of the Spanish economy, not of the US economy. Or at least, the overseas bases consumption will not be pulled from the US strategic oil reserves.
So it is all orthogonal to the US strategic oil reserves what the US military's share in energy consumption of the US Federal Government is.
Cuz the US strategic oil reserve isn't earmarked for the federal government and the share of the military energy usage in the federal energy usage is entirely meaningless tot the oil consumption of the US economy.
Ursula von der Leyen’s trade troubles are just beginning | Politico.eu
4mon 23d ago in EUpolitics@slrpnk.net from www.politico.euEDRi-gram, 21 January 2026 - European Digital Rights (EDRi)
4mon 23d ago in EUpolitics@slrpnk.net from edri.orgEPP punishes MEPs for failing to support Ursula von der Leyen | Euractiv
4mon 23d ago in EUpolitics@slrpnk.net from www.euractiv.comGreenland row: EU to hold emergency summit on Trump tariffs | Deutsche Welle
4mon 29d ago in EUpolitics@slrpnk.net from www.dw.comEU supports US invasion of Venezuela by claiming Maduro is an illegitimate president. Refuses to call the US invasion illegitimate.
5mon 15d ago in europe@lemmy.ml from lemmy.mlA position the EU has taken since.... last year? See https://www.politico.eu/article/european-union-not-recognize-venezuela-election-result-nicolas-maduro/
So, you could hardly expect her to diverge from that earlier position.






