1700 students graduating, little shock one may have had a cell phone

This Stanford math is over my head.

It's because when you write assholes well, assholes can't help but deliver.

Let's also remember it's not "right wing leaders" who have passed 99% of the laws in Oregon in the past what, 30 years? Democrats sold out 30+ years ago and it's been lip service to meaningful change ever since. They aren't putting religion in schools or restricting voting, but corporate Democrats are the fucking problem in Oregon as they are centrist at best. We need support for progressives (which we're starting to see finally break through in local elections) to meaningfully change things and move the pendulum back to the left.

'first COVID, then inflation" as if that were the start of the experience. Go back to NAFTA, passed by the Dems and Clinton when the party became fully corporate owned, that was the end of the US middle class, and the 90s was when education also died and became a commodity with universities being run by MBAs looking at students like they were cell phone plan subscribers. Education became unaffordable over just a matter of years while good middle class jobs went to Mexico (for those that already weren't shiped overseas elsewhere).

Reagan's destruction of the air traffic controller union, along with the introduction of the 401k were watershed moments for greed, financial insecurity and economic instability, and the end of the US's flirtation with not being run by ultra rich.

Lots of recall campaigns have successfully been done. They have the benefit of being very public and attention grabbing by nature. That's if more immediate ejection/dismissal mechanisms don't exist on a panel/committee.

I'm rich and would rather the word mean something else entirely. Hey, now it does and I get to lock up people who disagree with things that benefit me. The law is only as good as those wielding it.

Full house cleaning needed in UK, US, Aus and some parts of Canada. The rot and corruption cannot stand.

As deliberately decided.

Depending on the state the (ex)employee is in, it can be illegal to withhold wages of any reason not prior authorized by the employee. As this was an involuntary termination(firing) the employee likely did not known it was coming. Depending on how she was normally paid it may have required payment at time of termination(depending on state again) so the employer may not have been able to deduct anything from a final check already processed/created.

With that said, everything ever in any company, security and HR basics book ever says you let the person walk with something and if you want to pursue theft charges you do so as a company. Most companies know people who are being fired experience a lot of emotions and it can put them in a state where they may act unpredictably. It may escalate into violence, retaliation by the (ex-employee), cause a scene, etc., none of which are anything approaching "worth it" for a company unless you're talking about trade secrets or the like and not a $1.14 vest. Many employees/humans, when given the chance to take a breath and leave the situation would have returned the vest, but being treated like a caged animal yields predictable results for corporations who sees their employees as such.

Horrifying and unsurprising from Walmart where customers are/were funneled into violence chutes(black Friday) to save $50 on TVs each year with no thought to the bigger picture or safety basics.

It's Nero. We can only hope suicide is also in the cards before long, but there has never been a bigger egoist so unlikely.